SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Tanev and necas

Créé par: csick
Équipe: 2024-25 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 28 mai 2024
Publié: 28 mai 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
87 500 000 $
2850 000 $
1850 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
34 800 000 $
44 000 000 $
43 400 000 $
54 000 000 $
12 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Necas, Martin [Droits de RFA]
CAR
  1. Hronek, Filip [Droits de RFA]
2.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de SJS
Logo de VAN
2025
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2026
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2187 700 000 $87 346 667 $0 $0 $353 333 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
11 600 000 $11 600 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 8
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
AD
RFA
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C, AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG
UFA
Logo de Islanders de New York
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
4 800 000 $4 800 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 2
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
G
RFA
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG
UFA
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
775 000 $775 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
28 mai à 19 h 57
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 11,518
Mentions "j'aime": 10,294
Personally I’d rather keep Mikheyev and play Suter as the 3C

Juulsen would play over McWard
28 mai à 20 h 3
#2
Nightowl26
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 1,761
Mentions "j'aime": 511
Isles decline....we are trying to shed salary...This doesn't make sense for us.
28 mai à 20 h 5
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 1,792
Mentions "j'aime": 1,103
Quoting: Nightowl26
Isles decline....we are trying to shed salary...This doesn't make sense for us.


250k in cap saved, although I think since Pager can play C we can get a low round pick, would still be worth it since cap space >>
28 mai à 20 h 5
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 3,261
Mentions "j'aime": 1,101
Those are two exact trades that I've looked at, but I'm not sure about either of them anymore.

In a vacuum it makes a lot of sense to go after Necas as a top-6 addition that fits our core age range. He would bring a different element to this team and while it is a bit risky to see how his style of play would mesh with our system, it could work it very well. My main concern is his hockey fit within our team. In my mind it's essentially Necas vs. Lindholm this offseason as they would both command a similar cap hit and play in the same spot. The advantage with Lindholm is he brings a different element that fits with our core very well as a bumper/middle/net front guy on the powerplay and is a core member of the PK. I'm not sure Necas can replicate either of those things, if he can then its an easy decision. Lindholm also would not cost any assets this summer beyond a contract, which Necas needs as well. The advantage with Necas is he's younger and has potential. Hockey wise I think Lindholm can impact more areas of the game and compliments the existing core we have perfectly, combining that with the fact that he costs zero assets and its tough for me to choose Necas over him.

The Pageau trade makes a lot of sense and he could fit in very well with us. My only concern would be a lack of team speed with the departure of Mikheyev which is something that management is very conscious of. It sounds like they believe he can be better next year and are willing to give him that chance.
csick a aimé ceci.
28 mai à 20 h 35
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2021
Messages: 686
Mentions "j'aime": 230
Quoting: FoxYou727
250k in cap saved, although I think since Pager can play C we can get a low round pick, would still be worth it since cap space >>


I actually really like the idea of this, matter of fact I think I'm the one that started it lol. However, this only works if they decide to trade Lee because Mikheyev is a middle 6 winger and doesn't solve their main issue upfront. I'll try to mock one up
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage