SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Broowinz

Créé par: PseudoBob78
Équipe: 2024-25 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 28 mai 2024
Publié: 28 mai 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
87 500 000 $
1850 000 $
21 100 000 $
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
77 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
55 000 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
44 100 000 $
11 000 000 $
1900 000 $
1775 000 $
11 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
BOS
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (NYI)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (OTT)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de NYI
Logo de OTT
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2025
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2026
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 700 000 $87 028 334 $50 000 $330 000 $671 666 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
AD
RFA
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
11 250 000 $11 250 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 7
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
870 000 $870 000 $ (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG
NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
G
RFA
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $$250K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
850 000 $850 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
28 mai à 6 h 14
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 5,998
Mentions "j'aime": 6,664
Zero interest from the hawks
Snowhawk18, Hawksguy81, PaulKorea and 2 others a aimé ceci.
28 mai à 7 h 57
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 20,877
Mentions "j'aime": 5,223
Canes decline. Freddie had a better season than Ullmark, has a better playoff resume, and is cheaper. Both expire next summer, so term isn't an issue. Easy n in a 1 for 1 swap, forget Necas
28 mai à 8 h 25
#3
Snowhawk
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 3,210
Mentions "j'aime": 4,897
Hawks extended Mrazek late in the season they don’t need a goalie, especially one they have to trade assets for.
Hawksguy81 et PaulKorea a aimé ceci.
28 mai à 9 h 8
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2024
Messages: 10
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Anderson played 16 games in the regular season lol he didn’t have a season to compare, Ullmark was once again very good

Quoting: Caniac2000
Canes decline. Freddie had a better season than Ullmark, has a better playoff resume, and is cheaper. Both expire next summer, so term isn't an issue. Easy n in a 1 for 1 swap, forget Necas
28 mai à 9 h 26
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 20,877
Mentions "j'aime": 5,223
Quoting: Dadoinks
Anderson played 16 games in the regular season lol he didn’t have a season to compare, Ullmark was once again very good


Freddie was a .932 goalie. Ullmark was a .915. In the playoffs, Ullmark sucked, and Freddie was... well, not great but above average making him the only one of the two above it
28 mai à 9 h 35
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 1,825
Mentions "j'aime": 3,095
Hawks laugh and hang up. They'll take a 2nd and 3rd with Andersen but they aren't giving up those picks for him.
Snowhawk18 et Garak a aimé ceci.
28 mai à 12 h 8
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2024
Messages: 10
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Is this a joke ? He started 16 games at .932 it doesn’t even show up in the NHL apps stats compared to .915 thru 40 Tied for 7th in the league and in his one start in the playoffs had a .912 sorry Anderson doesn’t sniff Ully take the L and move on

Quoting: Caniac2000
Freddie was a .932 goalie. Ullmark was a .915. In the playoffs, Ullmark sucked, and Freddie was... well, not great but above average making him the only one of the two above it
28 mai à 12 h 24
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 20,877
Mentions "j'aime": 5,223
Quoting: Dadoinks
Is this a joke ? He started 16 games at .932 it doesn’t even show up in the NHL apps stats compared to .915 thru 40 Tied for 7th in the league and in his one start in the playoffs had a .912 sorry Anderson doesn’t sniff Ully take the L and move on


What... In the postseason Freddie had a 1.9 GSAx, Ullmark had a -0.5. Ullmark was worse than replacement. Freddie struggled in the Rangers series, but was EXTREMELY impressive in the Isles one. Freddie's life threatening clotting issue only let him play 16 games, but he was still better. Not to mention, in the last 3 years, he's been a + .920 goalie twice for the Canes. Ullmark's been .920+ once. Freddie is the better goalie, stop it.
28 mai à 15 h 19
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2024
Messages: 10
Mentions "j'aime": 1
This take has genuinely made me laugh thank you sir

Quoting: Caniac2000
What... In the postseason Freddie had a 1.9 GSAx, Ullmark had a -0.5. Ullmark was worse than replacement. Freddie struggled in the Rangers series, but was EXTREMELY impressive in the Isles one. Freddie's life threatening clotting issue only let him play 16 games, but he was still better. Not to mention, in the last 3 years, he's been a + .920 goalie twice for the Canes. Ullmark's been .920+ once. Freddie is the better goalie, stop it.
28 mai à 15 h 23
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 7,645
Mentions "j'aime": 3,684
The difference between Necas and Geekie was way more than Ullmark and Freddy.
28 mai à 15 h 39
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 20,877
Mentions "j'aime": 5,223
Quoting: Dadoinks
This take has genuinely made me laugh thank you sir


If statistically backed up facts make you laugh, you got a weird sense of humor
31 mai à 1 h 40
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 13
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: SociallyHawkward
Zero interest from the hawks


Hawks were more of a placeholder team but they could definitely be interested in a goalie to replace Soderblom for a year
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage