SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

My Dream Offseason

Créé par: MikeyVC97
Équipe: 2024-25 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 23 mai 2024
Publié: 23 mai 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3950 000 $
3950 000 $
3950 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
26 500 000 $
39 000 000 $
34 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Hall, Taylor
  2. Murphy, Connor
  3. Reichel, Lukas
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (VAN)
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (TOR)
2.
NYR
  1. Athanasiou, Andreas
  2. Raddysh, Taylor [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (TBL)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (DAL)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de LAK
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
2025
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2026
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2287 700 000 $82 601 334 $0 $6 837 500 $5 098 666 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
C
RFA - 2
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD
UFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
912 500 $912 500 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance900 000 $$900K)
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
AD
RFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
962 500 $962 500 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
825 000 $825 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
RFA - 2
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
846 667 $846 667 $ (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 mai à 11 h 40
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 1,769
Mentions "j'aime": 3,025
Those are both awful for Chicago.
exo2769 et SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
23 mai à 11 h 43
#2
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 16,213
Mentions "j'aime": 10,746
This would be terrible for Chicago. Talk about a Seth Jones 2.0 trade. Pay ALL that just so Marner can hold 100% of the cards and take $12M+ and then we have (2) bad contracts on this team.
SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
23 mai à 11 h 43
#3
Démarrer sujet
MikeyVC97
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,030
Mentions "j'aime": 175
Quoting: PaulKorea
Those are both awful for Chicago.


Can you explain why you think that? I see it as upgrades for the Hawks in each situation.
23 mai à 11 h 45
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 2,744
Mentions "j'aime": 813
On the right track with Marner, not quite enough quality. Murphy is interesting, but I think there are better UFA options they would pursue to improve the blue line. Hall probably not interested in. First and 2nd is good. Reichel is ok but he fits chicagos timeline of success better than Toronto’s
23 mai à 11 h 45
#5
Démarrer sujet
MikeyVC97
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,030
Mentions "j'aime": 175
Quoting: exo2769
This would be terrible for Chicago. Talk about a Seth Jones 2.0 trade. Pay ALL that just so Marner can hold 100% of the cards and take $12M+ and then we have (2) bad contracts on this team.


Top 4 RD are going to get north of 8+ mil going forward. The cap is going to continue to rise and in 3 years a 9.5 mil contract will feel like a 6 mil contract.
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
23 mai à 11 h 45
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 2,744
Mentions "j'aime": 813
Quoting: exo2769
This would be terrible for Chicago. Talk about a Seth Jones 2.0 trade. Pay ALL that just so Marner can hold 100% of the cards and take $12M+ and then we have (2) bad contracts on this team.


Marner doesn’t have a bad contract though. He makes pretty much what he deserves
23 mai à 11 h 46
#7
Démarrer sujet
MikeyVC97
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,030
Mentions "j'aime": 175
Quoting: SNipeSHowInc
On the right track with Marner, not quite enough quality. Murphy is interesting, but I think there are better UFA options they would pursue to improve the blue line. Hall probably not interested in. First and 2nd is good. Reichel is ok but he fits chicagos timeline of success better than Toronto’s


I honestly think the Hawks bust with Reichel and if they can sell him to whoever this year as part of a big move I think they need to.
23 mai à 11 h 52
#8
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 16,213
Mentions "j'aime": 10,746
Quoting: MikeyVC97
Top 4 RD are going to get north of 8+ mil going forward. The cap is going to continue to rise and in 3 years a 9.5 mil contract will feel like a 6 mil contract.


I'm all for keeping Seth Jones! He provides a vital role on this team as is. He means more to the Hawks than he'd mean to other teams. But let's also keep in mind that in 3 years Seth Jones will be 3 years older too.
23 mai à 11 h 54
#9
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 16,213
Mentions "j'aime": 10,746
Quoting: SNipeSHowInc
Marner doesn’t have a bad contract though. He makes pretty much what he deserves


It's not what he makes today. It's that he would hold 100% of the cards in any contract negotiation. That's why a Marner to the Hawks trade is just a bad idea. Why give up ANY assets just to give all your negotiation leverage to Marner? It's not like the Hawks next year with Marner are all of a sudden contenders. Just wait until he's a UFA and then go after him...if it HAS to be Marner.
23 mai à 11 h 59
#10
GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 892
Mentions "j'aime": 355
NYR say thank you and push this trade through before you can second guess yourself
23 mai à 12 h 2
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 13
Mentions "j'aime": 6
As a Hawks fan that is unfortunately also a default leafs fan because I live in Toronto, there's nothing I would hate more than Marner on this team, he's lazy and whiny, makes others around him worse, and is a total diva. Please please please no Marner.
PaulKorea et SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
23 mai à 12 h 3
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 1,769
Mentions "j'aime": 3,025
Quoting: MikeyVC97
Can you explain why you think that? I see it as upgrades for the Hawks in each situation.


Marner doesn't fit the Hawks timeline, will be overpaid, and you're leaving multiple holes in the Hawks lineup. Plus giving up draft capital that the Hawks aren't in a position to give up yet.


Trouba is not that good and is nowhere near worth all that. A 1st for him is a non-starter to begin with. AA is one of the few NHL quality players in the lineup and trading him makes an already weak offense even weaker. Make it a 2nd+Raddysh and maybe I could be talked into it. On the plus side, Trouba wouldn't be injuring any more of Chicago's players if he played for the Hawks.


Calling Reichel a bust already is a bit of a stretch. He looked much better after his stint in Rockford and he's looked good at the WC. He probably doesn't even turn into a 70-80 point guy but if he can hit 50ish every year then the Hawks should be keeping him around. I'm not opposed to moving him for the right deal but just tossing him in as a throwaway right now is a complete waste.
SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
23 mai à 12 h 9
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,805
Mentions "j'aime": 12,037
CHI declines all of this.
23 mai à 12 h 15
#14
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 19,213
Mentions "j'aime": 6,991
Rangers send a gift basket
PaulKorea et SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
23 mai à 12 h 35
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 5,979
Mentions "j'aime": 6,637
I don't think you understand the vision Kyle Davidson has for this team if you think adding a couple of 30 year old bad defensemen and 35 year old wingers then overpaying for a small winger who has made it clear he cares more about money than winning is a "dream offseason". This would be a bowman esque nightmare offseason for this team and would turn them into the Minnesota Wild. Barely making the playoffs and never making it past the 2nd round for the next decade.
Garak a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage