SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Doing All 32 Teams Realistic Offseasons Habs

Créé par: youngmoney
Équipe: 2024-25 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 1 mai 2024
Publié: 1 mai 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This is team #17 of the series, and I’m going to put a bit more thought into each build (its hard enough doing every team when you follow one team). I personally think if the habs were to push to be competitive (they said they do) this is what id do. If you like this series let me know your thoughts!
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
67 000 000 $
2900 000 $
2900 000 $
2900 000 $
23 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
12 450 000 $
Transactions
1.
MTL
  1. Necas, Martin [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
Necas Extended (6 x 7) - Fits the forward core perfectly while giving them a good boost, Carolina cant afford Necas plus all their other FAS
CAR
  1. Mailloux, Logan
  2. Mesar, Filip
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (WPG)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (VAN)
2.
MTL
  1. Lundell, Anton [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (CGY)
FLA
  1. Dvorak, Christian
  2. Harris, Jordan
  3. Choix de 5e ronde en 2024 (SJS)
3.
DET
  1. Barron, Justin
  2. Farrell, Sean
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (PIT)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de MTL
Logo de COL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MIN
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de EDM
Logo de WSH
2025
Logo de MTL
Logo de CGY
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de NJD
Logo de MTL
Logo de DET
Logo de CGY
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2026
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 500 000 $74 876 805 $1 022 500 $5 670 000 $12 623 195 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 7
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
C, AG
RFA
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 362 500 $3 362 500 $
C, AD
RFA - 2
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
RFA
2 450 000 $2 450 000 $
AG
UFA
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
812 500 $812 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance750 000 $$750K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
890 000 $890 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance420 000 $$420K)
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
900 000 $900 000 $
DG/DD
RFA
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
766 667 $766 667 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
1 mai à 23 h 49
#1
PittsburghModelMyAss
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,414
Mentions "j'aime": 1,430
one must surely think Lundell is worth more than that... right?
OldNYIfan et RaZZe a aimé ceci.
1 mai à 23 h 55
#2
Démarrer sujet
youngmoney
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2024
Messages: 80
Mentions "j'aime": 12
Quoting: BigBadBurke
one must surely think Lundell is worth more than that... right?


i forgot to half retain Dvorak but him + a young Harris at a low aav i feel like is a sway for flordia. theyre gonna want nhl players for cheap with limited money and yes i think other teams can offer better picks and what not but i feel like they go players > picks here
1 mai à 23 h 56
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 1,434
Mentions "j'aime": 584
Quoting: BigBadBurke
one must surely think Lundell is worth more than that... right?


Definitely, trading him for Dvorak makes 0 sense, they could bridge him for cheaper
OldNYIfan et RaZZe a aimé ceci.
1 mai à 23 h 57
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 1,830
Mentions "j'aime": 718
Mtl isn’t spending this much for Necas. They won’t trade Mailloux away after the season he just got. Necas is not even a top line winger.
BigBadBurke a aimé ceci.
1 mai à 23 h 59
#5
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,993
Mentions "j'aime": 25,789
I think that the cap problem Carolina faces is exaggerated.

https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/5082764

Florida will get a first-round draft pick plus a more useful player than Dvorak or Harris for Anton Lundell.
BigBadBurke et RaZZe a aimé ceci.
2 mai à 0 h 5
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 1,830
Mentions "j'aime": 718
Quoting: OldNYIfan
I think that the cap problem Carolina faces is exaggerated.

https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/5082764

Florida will get a first-round draft pick plus a more useful player than Dvorak or Harris for Anton Lundell.


Harris might be exactly the kind of players Florida would want. He is the more NHL reliable at this instant and for a cup contending team who don’t have room to develop players Harris could fit in right away in the top 6 and provide instant help at low cost. Jake Evans could be added along with the Jets first.
2 mai à 0 h 9
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 1,434
Mentions "j'aime": 584
Quoting: OldNYIfan
I think that the cap problem Carolina faces is exaggerated.

https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/5082764

Florida will get a first-round draft pick plus a more useful player than Dvorak or Harris for Anton Lundell.


They lose a lot of good players in that ACGM. If the right offer comes along I think I'd try to resign Turbo and flip Necas.
2 mai à 0 h 11
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 1,434
Mentions "j'aime": 584
Quoting: Joblow
Harris might be exactly the kind of players Florida would want. He is the more NHL reliable at this instant and for a cup contending team who don’t have room to develop players Harris could fit in right away in the top 6 and provide instant help at low cost. Jake Evans could be added along with the Jets first.


Maybe Harris could help Florida, but they could probably get him for a 3rd round pick, lundell is way more valuable.
RaZZe et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
2 mai à 0 h 16
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 1,830
Mentions "j'aime": 718
Quoting: Shaun80
Maybe Harris could help Florida, but they could probably get him for a 3rd round pick, lundell is way more valuable.


Problem is not Lundell play but cap space. Lundell on a bridge deal will be at least between 3-3.5 millions for 2 season. Florida have Montour, Reinhart, Bennet and Verhaege to resign the next 2 season along with 10 roster spot to fill. In my opinion Florida have a better chance at the cup in the next couple season with all these four players than with Lundell
2 mai à 0 h 27
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 1,434
Mentions "j'aime": 584
Quoting: Joblow
Problem is not Lundell play but cap space. Lundell on a bridge deal will be at least between 3-3.5 millions for 2 season. Florida have Montour, Reinhart, Bennet and Verhaege to resign the next 2 season along with 10 roster spot to fill. In my opinion Florida have a better chance at the cup in the next couple season with all these four players than with Lundell


Lundells already playing 2C with Bennetts injury, let him walk and keep the young guy who's going to be around longer.
RaZZe a aimé ceci.
2 mai à 8 h 55
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 1,830
Mentions "j'aime": 718
Quoting: Shaun80
Lundells already playing 2C with Bennetts injury, let him walk and keep the young guy who's going to be around longer.


Florida is a thru cup contender, they don’t want to have a players who will be around longer. They want to win the cup. Colorado traded Newhook for this exact purpose. They wanted a players that was more NHL reliable but who have definitely a lesser ceiling.
2 mai à 9 h 34
#12
Démarrer sujet
youngmoney
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2024
Messages: 80
Mentions "j'aime": 12
Quoting: Joblow
Harris might be exactly the kind of players Florida would want. He is the more NHL reliable at this instant and for a cup contending team who don’t have room to develop players Harris could fit in right away in the top 6 and provide instant help at low cost. Jake Evans could be added along with the Jets first.


my reasoning exactly
Joblow a aimé ceci.
2 mai à 11 h 24
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 1,149
Mentions "j'aime": 447
There is no sense in trading Lundell. He is playing at such a high level. With Bennett's injury, the Tkachuck-Lundell-Verhaeghe is a top3 line in the playoffs controlling over 70% of the expected goals.

If they can't make the cap work with Reinhart, Montour, etc, it would make more sense to trade Bennett since he is making more, is probably out the door in 2025 anyway, and looks like is going to slide into a lesser role. Plus this return is way too low.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage