SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

3 way deal

Équipe: 2024-25 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 28 avr. 2024
Publié: 28 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
A bit emotional, but I was never high on Marner anyways, and only really appreciated his pk abilities.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
33 450 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
46 500 000 $
44 250 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Andersson, Rasmus
  2. Weegar, MacKenzie
Détails additionnels:
Whether you blame Marner alone or the coach or the entire team is irrelevant, the Leafs have folded yet again under the pressure of the playoffs. The biggest on ice factor for that result is (imo) the guy who couldn't generate any physicality, couldn't string a pass together despite being one of the best playmakers in the regular season, and is getting paid as much as two impact defensemen. This isn't calling Marner a terrible player, it's just pointing out that it's unacceptable to keep him around and extend him if you're the Leafs after that performance. Replacing a glorified penalty killer with two top 4 defense with some term (a lot of term in the case of Weeger) and opening up options to refresh the top 6 is vital.
CGY
  1. Marner, Mitchell
Détails additionnels:
Skips over Calgary for Buffalo in 3 way deal (Calgary acquires Östlund, Rosén, Savoie, and a 2026 or 2027 Buffalo 1st)

Buffalo fell short of expectations this season, but between Tampa showing signs of slowing down and the second wildcard spot seemingly being up for grabs, picking up a star for futures that won't be in play for at least one more season should be on the Sabres' front office's mind. Marner is a 26 year old who's shown his two way ability and playmaking skills time and time again, and though his playoff showings haven't been all too glorious, Buffalo needs to make it there in the first place before complaining about his post season impact. Between the cap going up and his play being unimpressive to say the least, it's unlikely he gets more than $11 mil, which isn't bad for a 70 assist pk1 pp1 guy.
2.
TOR
  1. Gibson, John (2 000 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Gibson's value over the last few years has fallen through the floor over the past two years, but Leafs fans should know best that you can't count the stats of Anaheim players after Benoit and Lyubushkin went from some of the worst defensemen on earth into actually impactful players. With Sammy leaving and no impressive goalies in FA, Gibson can be a solid option to win now and get kicked out the door when Woll and Hildeby have had a couple years in the league.
ANA
  1. Dewar, Connor [Droits de RFA]
  2. Niemelä, Topi
Détails additionnels:
Anaheim adds to their incredible future defense group and picks up an RFA who's young and a solid two way player.
3.
TOR
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (SEA)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (SEA)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (SEA)
Détails additionnels:
Toronto recoups picks for deadline upgrades in exchange for a guy who didn't make sense on any of their lines
SEA
  1. Robertson, Nicholas [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
Seattle gets a young forward with that dog in him and an underutilized shot, making him the perfect fit for them long term.
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de SEA
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de NSH
Logo de VAN
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2026
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2087 700 000 $86 508 334 $0 $0 $1 191 666 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
13 250 000 $13 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
C, AD
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
816 667 $816 667 $
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 500 000 $11 500 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
766 667 $766 667 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 450 000 $3 450 000 $
DD
RFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
28 avr. à 9 h 58
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,174
Mentions "j'aime": 13,212
John doesn’t want to play for you so no deal from Anaheim
28 avr. à 10 h 3
#2
Be Constructive
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 907
Mentions "j'aime": 117
I don't think Gibson is a nice gamble for TOR. tbh value wise I'm okay with the trades thought. Would rather try Gustavsson in MIN.
28 avr. à 10 h 4
#3
Démarrer sujet
Kampf Supremacy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2021
Messages: 162
Mentions "j'aime": 40
Quoting: GeneralLandro
John doesn’t want to play for you so no deal from Anaheim


I know, but 2 things: first, in a theoretical world where the Leafs were not located in Toronto, I wanted to see if the value was there, and second, it was between him, Hart, Ullmark, and Markstrom. I'm a bonified Markstrom hater, Leafs aren't trading with Boston, and unless Hart's lawyer clutches up like a certain Bills player's did, that ain't happening either.
28 avr. à 10 h 5
#4
Démarrer sujet
Kampf Supremacy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2021
Messages: 162
Mentions "j'aime": 40
Quoting: Korax
I don't think Gibson is a nice gamble for TOR. tbh value wise I'm okay with the trades thought. Would rather try Gustavsson in MIN.


Love the fit, he didn't even cross my mind
Korax a aimé ceci.
28 avr. à 11 h 1
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 3,269
Mentions "j'aime": 2,243
Quoting: Random_internet_guy_1967
I know, but 2 things: first, in a theoretical world where the Leafs were not located in Toronto, I wanted to see if the value was there, and second, it was between him, Hart, Ullmark, and Markstrom. I'm a bonified Markstrom hater, Leafs aren't trading with Boston, and unless Hart's lawyer clutches up like a certain Bills player's did, that ain't happening either.


Since we already recognize that Gibby wouldn’t waive, I’ll just talk value.

Dewar has basically no value, and ANA will have zero interest in Topi. They already have Zellweger for an undersized Dman, there isn’t room for a second on any NHL club, let alone one run by Verbeek. It’s a big part of why Drys was expendable.

If ANA is retaining $2M on Gibby, they’d want something of meaningful value back, otherwise they’d just keep him. They have no cap issues and he’s a leader here for the young group. This just isn’t an attractive return at all. And I’m one of the ANA fans who’s been in on selling Gibby for years. I totally acknowledge how his stats look and the inconsistency in his play (particularly in the 2nd half of the season every year)
28 avr. à 11 h 30
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2023
Messages: 849
Mentions "j'aime": 341
Robertson's not worth that much draft capital. Seattle counters with a single 2nd.
28 avr. à 11 h 49
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 8,461
Mentions "j'aime": 3,505
Calgary doesn't want Marner they certainly won't trade Weegar or Andersson for him.
28 avr. à 11 h 56
#8
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 10,978
Mentions "j'aime": 7,796
Simply put, those pieces aren't worth eating 6 million dollars for, neither of them really hold any value to Anaheim since they're not particularly promising prospects.

If Gibson gets traded, it's probably next TDL or Off-season where there will only be two years left to retain salary on and there will be a number of goalies available through free agency to backfill his position.
29 avr. à 13 h 23
#9
Démarrer sujet
Kampf Supremacy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2021
Messages: 162
Mentions "j'aime": 40
Quoting: MoxNix
Calgary doesn't want Marner they certainly won't trade Weegar or Andersson for him.


That's why it's a 3 way deal...
I get not reading the 3 page description under the trade, I don't even proof read those things after typing them, but the first sentence that is specifically separated from the explanation is that Marner goes to Buffalo for a couple prospects and picks (in which Buffalo overpays a bit) instead.
29 avr. à 14 h 8
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 8,461
Mentions "j'aime": 3,505
Quoting: Random_internet_guy_1967
That's why it's a 3 way deal...
I get not reading the 3 page description under the trade, I don't even proof read those things after typing them, but the first sentence that is specifically separated from the explanation is that Marner goes to Buffalo for a couple prospects and picks (in which Buffalo overpays a bit) instead.


Calgary doesn't want or need even more small forwards / forward prospects, Buffalo wouldn't trade them + a 1st for Marner and Marner wouldn't waive anyhow.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage