SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Reichel Contract

Créé par: Kyle_Davidson
Équipe: 2024-25 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 25 avr. 2024
Publié: 27 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Now that Vlasic is done, which honestly was the biggest realistic question this offseason for Davidson, let’s move on to Reichel. What does #27s contract look like going into next season. I am somewhat torn between offering him a 1 or 2 year bridge deal. On one hand, offering him a one year bridge could lead
to a longer extension next offseason if he plays well and shows out as a core piece. On the other hand, we have time with Reichel and I think confidence is an issue with his game, does offering him a 2 year deal allow him to settle in and develop better than a one year deal?

On the other hand we could Franchise mode it and offer him 8x3AAV 😎.


I think my preference would be to show him some investment, and give him a 2 year deal because I think that would allow him to settle in. However, him betting on himself and signing an extension next offseason (with a successful year) would help up navigate the summer of Nazar, Bedard, and Korchinsky.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 100 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
25 000 000 $
23 250 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de LAK
Logo de VAN
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
2025
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de DAL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2026
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $68 407 500 $0 $6 815 000 $15 092 500 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance900 000 $$900K)
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
825 000 $825 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
912 500 $912 500 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
DG
RFA - 2
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
962 500 $962 500 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
855 833 $855 833 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AD
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
RFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 avr. à 7 h 33
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,113
Mentions "j'aime": 10,987
Agreed. Pay the kid, give him some peace of mind.
exo2769 et Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
27 avr. à 9 h 0
#2
CoachQ
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 153
Mentions "j'aime": 97
If Davidson could get Reichel for 8 years with an AAV of $3MM, he should be arrested for robbery as that would be a better deal than Vlasic got. Short term though, I agree with 2-years at $1MM-$1.5MM. Showed some great flashes but still has a lot to prove.
Garak et Earth a aimé ceci.
27 avr. à 9 h 4
#3
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,772
Mentions "j'aime": 9,946
Quoting: CoachQ
If Davidson could get Reichel for 8 years with an AAV of $3MM, he should be arrested for robbery as that would be a better deal than Vlasic got. Short term though, I agree with 2-years at $1MM-$1.5MM. Showed some great flashes but still has a lot to prove.


Maybe, Reichel will have to play ALOT better than last year for that. Could he? Absolutely. Will he? I very much hope so.
Garak a aimé ceci.
27 avr. à 9 h 6
#4
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,772
Mentions "j'aime": 9,946
I don't see the franchise mode occurring. I don't think either side really wants that. You could have. Jesperi Kotkaniemi situation.

I think what you have above is the most likely. Give him some piece of mind. That's life changing money for anyone normal. He's at the big club permanently too. I'm all for it.
Hawksguy81, Kyle_Davidson et Garak a aimé ceci.
27 avr. à 9 h 14
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,308
Mentions "j'aime": 4,961
I mean he definitely hasn't earned the 2.1M that you have here. We have all the cap space so it doesn't really matter, but just going based on what he's proven to be worth i'd say 1 year 950k. Gives him the chance to proves he's a full time contributing NHL'er.
Kyle_Davidson, exo2769, Garak and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
27 avr. à 9 h 39
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 8,954
Mentions "j'aime": 10,855
I've had Reichel pegged at 2x$2m, so we are in agreement. Shows Lukas Hawks still have confidence in him.
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
27 avr. à 10 h 1
#7
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,905
Mentions "j'aime": 5,888
Quoting: exo2769
I don't see the franchise mode occurring. I don't think either side really wants that. You could have. Jesperi Kotkaniemi situation.

I think what you have above is the most likely. Give him some piece of mind. That's life changing money for anyone normal. He's at the big club permanently too. I'm all for it.


The franchise mode is definitely a joke 🤣
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
27 avr. à 10 h 3
#8
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,905
Mentions "j'aime": 5,888
Quoting: Wadejos123
I mean he definitely hasn't earned the 2.1M that you have here. We have all the cap space so it doesn't really matter, but just going based on what he's proven to be worth i'd say 1 year 950k. Gives him the chance to proves he's a full time contributing NHL'er.


I wouldn’t be surprised to see him get his QO, at least in terms of what he earned this year. I’m all for the hawks laying the groundwork for an extension down the road by paying him over value right now. Not too much of course, but I think 2 X 2.1
exo2769 et Garak a aimé ceci.
27 avr. à 11 h 27
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,113
Mentions "j'aime": 10,987
Quoting: Wadejos123
I mean he definitely hasn't earned the 2.1M that you have here. We have all the cap space so it doesn't really matter, but just going based on what he's proven to be worth i'd say 1 year 950k. Gives him the chance to proves he's a full time contributing NHL'er.


If he were arbitration eligible, he would most likely command around $1.5-2M, given his total production over the last few years. His struggles in the first 3/4's of the year weren't entirely his fault, either. They asked him to bulk up a substantial amount over the summer, which he did, and then they asked him to jump straight into a full time role in the NHL as a top 6 center, which he doesn't have a ton of experience playing.

He was drafted as a "center" and has certainly tried to play center and been put there a few times, and I kept hearing the rhetoric the last few seasons that he would or did play center for Rockford, but I watched a lot of their games the last few years and he almost never did. I don't know where the disconnect is, if it's CHI beat writers, and/or internal communication shortcomings, but anyone who says different is just wrong because I know what I saw and it was never a center. Even in most of the games where they had him listed as a center on the line combinations, they would quickly move him back to the wing.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage