SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Bigger

Créé par: Joblow
Équipe: 2024-25 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 25 avr. 2024
Publié: 26 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Sharangovich sign 6 years 42millions extension
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
3925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
31 750 000 $
1900 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Greentree, Liam
3925 000 $
Beaudoin, Cole
3925 000 $
Transactions
1.
MTL
  1. Sharangovich, Yegor
  2. Vladar, Daniel
Détails additionnels:
Sharangovich tell Conroy that he won’t resign scenario
CGY
  1. Beck, Owen
  2. Dvorak, Christian
  3. Harris, Jordan
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (WPG)
  5. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (VAN)
Détails additionnels:
Dvorak could be flip with Retention for another asset. Stop with the cap dump shit, Dvorak make to much money we all know but he still a NHL caliber player who can play center and win some faceoff.
Beck ceiling might not be that high but is floor is 3rd line defensive center.
Harris is a reliable 5th-6th defenseman already.
2.
MTL
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (FLA)
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (PHI)
Détails additionnels:
12th pick
30th pick
PHI
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (MTL)
Détails additionnels:
7th pick
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de FLA
Logo de PHI
Logo de COL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MIN
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de SJS
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de EDM
Logo de WSH
2025
Logo de MTL
Logo de CGY
Logo de MTL
Logo de PIT
Logo de MTL
Logo de NJD
Logo de MTL
Logo de DET
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2026
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 500 000 $70 796 250 $1 022 500 $4 670 000 $16 703 750 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 7
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 362 500 $3 362 500 $
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
835 000 $835 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
900 000 $900 000 $
DD
RFA
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance750 000 $$750K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance420 000 $$420K)
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
890 000 $890 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DG/DD
RFA
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
812 500 $812 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
766 667 $766 667 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 avr. à 20 h 58
#26
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 7,855
Mentions "j'aime": 3,301
Modifié 27 avr. à 21 h 23
Quoting: Bast
How did you come up with "Vladar was worth a 2nd"? I guess the same logic can apply to Huberdeau since he brought back Tkachuk. Yet somehow I wish we could trade him for FC now. If there was an offer of a 3rd for Vladar this summer Conroy would've traded him.

Vladar had some of the worst analytics out of the entire NHL over the last 2 years. IMO, he's worth a league min contract, since he was playing at a replacement level, despite showing occasional Flashes of brilliance.


That's a horrible take. Calgary wasn't moving Vlader for a 3rd last summer if they'd been willing to accept that he'd be long gone already.

When Vladar got to start more than the odd game every once in a while he was just fine. He's quicker than Marky with better reflexes and glove too. He'll be fine after getting surgery and with more practice as a starter / tandem goalie instead of getting thrown in on short notice most of the time.

You need to stop believing trash talk from the homers around here. When the worst trash talking homers like a trade involving their team it's because they're robbing the other team blind. The simple fact is most trade proposals that are good value for both teams and meet both teams' needs/wants are hated by the majority of both teams' fans.

For all the others who will undoubtedly feel the need to comment on this. I don't bull**** and I don't fall for your bull**** either. I tell it like I see it. If someone doesn't like it that's his problem. I don't expect everyone to agree with me but I don't respond to people who repeatedly resort to ad hominin attacks or post walls of text full of lies and logical fallacies trying to rationalize why bad trades are actually good trades for anyone but their own favorite team(s).
27 avr. à 22 h 43
#27
OldSLIMEfan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 226
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Quoting: MoxNix
Dvorak is overpaid by about half or 2.25 mil which isn't much more than 2 mil. Vladar on the other hand isn't overpaid, he's a good goalie as will be proven when he comes back after surgery next year. Selling low on Vladar while he's out would be poor asset management. Vladar was worth a 2nd before the injury which according to Markstrom Vladar has been playing with for more than a year.

Exactly Calgary has no need for Harris. If Calgary trades for a defenseman it'll be for a top 4 or a big mean hard hitting guy similar to Zadorov or Gudbranson both of whom have been missed for the physical presence they bring.

Owen Beck is worth a mid 2nd and that's it. With 50% rentention that makes it Sharky + Vladar for a late 1st + late 3rd a B/B+ prospect + 2 players who add no value for Calgary. In fact one of them is a 2.25 mil cap dump (negative value) and as Flames fans know very well Murray Edwards would frown on that.

Sharky is a bit of a wildcard. The smart thing for Conroy to do is wait until well into next season to see how he performs before deciding if the team should extend Sharky again and for how much. Unless of course he gets an offer so good it just can't be refused.


Delusional but cute. Vladar worth a 2nd. How adorable.

Quoting: MoxNix

For all the others who will undoubtedly feel the need to comment on this. I don't bull**** and I don't fall for your bull**** either. I tell it like I see it. If someone doesn't like it that's his problem. I don't expect everyone to agree with me but I don't respond to people who repeatedly resort to ad hominin attacks or post walls of text full of lies and logical fallacies trying to rationalize why bad trades are actually good trades for anyone but their own favorite team(s).


Chill. You are going to have a stroke.
Joblow a aimé ceci.
28 avr. à 0 h 0
#28
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 1,821
Mentions "j'aime": 716
Quoting: Bast
I just think that there's a good chance the Flames re-sign him. As I said, I won't be too upset with that trade, and a lot of it has to do with me being unfamiliar with Beck as a prospect, obviously the scouting staff of the Flames would have a much better opinion than me.


Owen Beck have a Nhl game already. Great 2 way centerman, who excel on faceoff. Great skater, good shot. Is playmaking ability aren’t that high but is overall positioning is exceptional so he might have more success playing with professional player. I would say is ceiling is Anthony Cirelli and is floor Phillip Danault. He won’t be a highlight real player but he is a dream players for coaches.
He would instantly become Flames best centerprospect even if your fellow man who think Vladar isn’t overpaid portraits him as a marginal b prospect who doesn’t hold any value. Considering Flames situation at the centerposition, is Sharangovixh would want out. Beck would be a solid consolation prize.
Bast et FarhanLuigi a aimé ceci.
28 avr. à 0 h 2
#29
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 1,821
Mentions "j'aime": 716
Quoting: MoxNix
That's a horrible take. Calgary wasn't moving Vlader for a 3rd last summer if they'd been willing to accept that he'd be long gone already.

When Vladar got to start more than the odd game every once in a while he was just fine. He's quicker than Marky with better reflexes and glove too. He'll be fine after getting surgery and with more practice as a starter / tandem goalie instead of getting thrown in on short notice most of the time.

You need to stop believing trash talk from the homers around here. When the worst trash talking homers like a trade involving their team it's because they're robbing the other team blind. The simple fact is most trade proposals that are good value for both teams and meet both teams' needs/wants are hated by the majority of both teams' fans.

For all the others who will undoubtedly feel the need to comment on this. I don't bull**** and I don't fall for your bull**** either. I tell it like I see it. If someone doesn't like it that's his problem. I don't expect everyone to agree with me but I don't respond to people who repeatedly resort to ad hominin attacks or post walls of text full of lies and logical fallacies trying to rationalize why bad trades are actually good trades for anyone but their own favorite team(s).


Even Calgary fan had enough of your bull****.
28 avr. à 4 h 25
#30
First round bust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 949
Mentions "j'aime": 407
Quoting: MoxNix
That's a horrible take. Calgary wasn't moving Vlader for a 3rd last summer if they'd been willing to accept that he'd be long gone already.

When Vladar got to start more than the odd game every once in a while he was just fine. He's quicker than Marky with better reflexes and glove too. He'll be fine after getting surgery and with more practice as a starter / tandem goalie instead of getting thrown in on short notice most of the time.

You need to stop believing trash talk from the homers around here. When the worst trash talking homers like a trade involving their team it's because they're robbing the other team blind. The simple fact is most trade proposals that are good value for both teams and meet both teams' needs/wants are hated by the majority of both teams' fans.

For all the others who will undoubtedly feel the need to comment on this. I don't bull**** and I don't fall for your bull**** either. I tell it like I see it. If someone doesn't like it that's his problem. I don't expect everyone to agree with me but I don't respond to people who repeatedly resort to ad hominin attacks or post walls of text full of lies and logical fallacies trying to rationalize why bad trades are actually good trades for anyone but their own favorite team(s).


Let's agree to disagree here then.

Here's how I see it - every team knew that CGY was looking to move a goalie in the offseason. CGY had the best goalie in the AHL for 2 years running, and both Markstrom and Vladar were bad under Sutter. Conroy even said as much. At some point he even commented(fan960) on only being offered a 5th or a 6th for Vladar.

I agree that Vladar looked better than "I just suck at hockey right now" Markstrom in spurts. Vladar would have 2 great games followed by 2 stinkers. That lacking consistency is why I don't value Vladar as highly as you do, especially at a $2M caphit.

PS: I base about 70% of my player evaluation of a Flames player on watching a player play. 20% on analytics to show me things I'm missing, and 10% on talking to oposing fans that don't watch that player as consistently as I do.

I would defer to analytics and other fans a lot more when talking about players I don't watch as much (like in the eastern Conference).
MoxNix et Joblow a aimé ceci.
28 avr. à 8 h 25
#31
OldSLIMEfan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 226
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Quoting: MoxNix
Dvorak is overpaid by about half or 2.25 mil which isn't much more than 2 mil. Vladar on the other hand isn't overpaid, he's a good goalie as will be proven when he comes back after surgery next year. Selling low on Vladar while he's out would be poor asset management. Vladar was worth a 2nd before the injury which according to Markstrom Vladar has been playing with for more than a year.

Exactly Calgary has no need for Harris. If Calgary trades for a defenseman it'll be for a top 4 or a big mean hard hitting guy similar to Zadorov or Gudbranson both of whom have been missed for the physical presence they bring.

Owen Beck is worth a mid 2nd and that's it. With 50% rentention that makes it Sharky + Vladar for a late 1st + late 3rd a B/B+ prospect + 2 players who add no value for Calgary. In fact one of them is a 2.25 mil cap dump (negative value) and as Flames fans know very well Murray Edwards would frown on that.

Sharky is a bit of a wildcard. The smart thing for Conroy to do is wait until well into next season to see how he performs before deciding if the team should extend Sharky again and for how much. Unless of course he gets an offer so good it just can't be refused.


Delusional but cute. Vladar worth a 2nd. How adorable.


Quoting: Bast
Let's agree to disagree here then.

Here's how I see it - every team knew that CGY was looking to move a goalie in the offseason. CGY had the best goalie in the AHL for 2 years running, and both Markstrom and Vladar were bad under Sutter. Conroy even said as much. At some point he even commented(fan960) on only being offered a 5th or a 6th for Vladar.

I agree that Vladar looked better than "I just suck at hockey right now" Markstrom in spurts. Vladar would have 2 great games followed by 2 stinkers. That lacking consistency is why I don't value Vladar as highly as you do, especially at a $2M caphit.

PS: I base about 70% of my player evaluation of a Flames player on watching a player play. 20% on analytics to show me things I'm missing, and 10% on talking to oposing fans that don't watch that player as consistently as I do.

I would defer to analytics and other fans a lot more when talking about players I don't watch as much (like in the eastern Conference).


The problem with goalies is consistency. Every year the stats, and the metrics will change. "GOALIES ARE VOODOO"
Teams will simply treat the position as a luxury.
There is no better example than Vegas giving away that year's incumbent Vezina winner for FREE to Chicago and they will probably have to give away the current SC winner, Adin Hil, away for FREE, if they wish to keep Marchy and Stephenson as well. And this isn't a new phenomenon. Nashville is another with Lankinen and Saros as Askarov will be in the lineup almost certainly next year. When you have goalies like Adin Hill and Kevin Lankinen available whom both are better by every metric stat than Vladar and only a few chairs to seat at goalie, the scarcity dynamic cant be ignored. The offseason also is tougher to move bad money than the Trade Deadline when you dont know the true makeup of your team and player/goalie retention is more to swallow instead of the cap hit being pro rated at the deadline.
Vladar going for anything more than the TDL and Jake Allen at retention would be shocking when you consider ALL THOSE circumstances.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage