Quoting: JSEB93
I mean, you cant really state that as if it's a fact though - because the season we just watched doesn't prove that. So yes - we will have to disagree. Nobody is arguing that he's the same guy he was 10 years ago - but I fail to see how that's a point?
He's clearly better than a league average 2C though. And you can't really use league average 2C as a negative point when you're replacement is a guy coming from the WHL. This has nothing to do with me being attached to a player - this has to do with me actually dealing with and facing facts.
Again, no argument that he isn't as good as he was 10 years ago - but I fail to see where that's a point? If you were replacing him with an upgrade, like Draisaitl, then obviously yes - but you're not.
See what happening? Where is he being exposed?
Sure if you wan to give him less responsibility then give him better wingers or sign a good center. Plus, again, I don't care if you have Yager at 2C(okay I do a little haha). My point was just the flawed logic of not playing towards their strengths regarding playmaking and scoring.
Malkin had a good season, not sure where this negativity is coming from. Yes - he's not the player he was 10 years ago - nobody is arguing he is. Okay - but I don't consider putting a WHL player at 2C as really patching it up. Yes - I agree, reduced expectations would be great. So surround him with good wingers or a good center if you're moving him to wing.
Sure, but you could also say that about someone like Sid. You never know, he may just go sign in Colorado. But we kinda do know. Okay, but then when he doesn't sign here what do you do? And you've held on to 6mil that could have been spent this offseason?
You keep focusing on Yager.... that has nothing to do with the judgement to move Malkin to wing.
I clearly get your concern there. I clearly realize Yager could not end up holding up that position. Which is why you see me saying they should go after Drai the next year.
But all of that has nothing to do with a putting a slowing Malkin on the wing.
It is object that Malkin is slowing. He's not a fast player on the ice anymore. Anyone watching knows this.
You keep saying he had a good year. I'm not sure how we can agree on that when the 2nd line was non existent for large stretches. That's the 2Cs job to make it relevant.
So when it disappears for months on end, and the guy who's suppose to drive it has disappeared, that's not a good year.
As I said above, you either recognize he's slowed down and does not have the foot speed he use to have or you don't.
I don't know how many years it takes for you to realize it. Maybe by mid point this up coming season you'll begin to realize it more. Some times people don't want to see something till it's pointed out. Then they see it.
But either way, Malkin is not a player who plays with Pace anymore, and because of that he doesn't drive a line and cause disruption making an impact like he use to.
It's ok, he's 38. It was bound to happen some time. Lets not make the mistake of not seeing it and get the most out of the next 2 years.
Instead of focusing on Yager as the excuse for not wanting to see it. Regardless of who goes to 2C, it's the best move for both the team and Malkin's production to move him over to LW.
It's better to have a really impactful winger than it is a average 2C. DAL realized that with JoePa. PIT needs to realize that with Malkin.