SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Lindy Guys

Créé par: Chapee44
Équipe: 2024-25 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 24 avr. 2024
Publié: 24 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Lindy likes guys who play attacking hockey from smart positioning to maintain defensive structure. I got 4 new forwards here who do that and supported them with 3 veteran dmen who are responsible but can activate/shoot.
My logic for buying out Skinner is it saves money in year 1 and 2 when paired with the Foegele contract as both sums are less than 9M. Year 3 is when it hurts, but that year there will be 3-5 valuable ELCs on the roster that aren't currently to remedy that (Kulich, Ostlund, Savoie, Wahlberg, '24 1st). The following 3 years are manageable from there.
Extensions:
Peterka 7M x 8 years
Quinn 5M x 2 years
Byram 6M x 2 years
Buchnevich 7.5M x 5 years
Levi, Johnson, Rousek, negligible.
Lindholm, Greenway, Girgensons, Martinez replaced with ELCs/league min. vets.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 000 000 $
21 200 000 $
43 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
55 000 000 $
1800 000 $
11 200 000 $
22 500 000 $
23 000 000 $
18 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
BUF
  1. Buchnevich, Pavel
Détails additionnels:
7.5M x 5 year extension
STL
  1. Rosén, Isak
  2. Samuelsson, Mattias
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (BUF)
Détails additionnels:
Trade made after the draft.
2.
BUF
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2025 (VAN)
3.
BUF
  1. Drury, Jack [Droits de RFA]
CAR
  1. Jokiharju, Henri [Droits de RFA]
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de PHI
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de FLA
2025
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de MIN
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de VAN
Logo de BUF
Logo de NSH
Logo de WSH
2026
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 500 000 $83 931 468 $0 $2 500 000 $3 568 532 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
855 833 $855 833 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
7 142 857 $7 142 857 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
AG, AD, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
7 100 000 $7 100 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance650 000 $$650K)
AG
RFA - 2
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AG
RFA
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, C
UFA
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
8 350 000 $8 350 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 8
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
RFA
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
G
RFA - 1
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG
UFA
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
24 avr. à 8 h 51
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,626
Mentions "j'aime": 933
Yes
Chapee44 et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
24 avr. à 9 h 17
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 337
Mentions "j'aime": 92
Yea Blues would say yes, personally im not a big believer in Rosen so id want better but thats just me being picky
24 avr. à 9 h 45
#3
Good Opinion Haver
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,837
Mentions "j'aime": 939
Quoting: noted
Yes


Quoting: Away
Yea Blues would say yes, personally im not a big believer in Rosen so id want better but thats just me being picky


Not necessarily saying no but how sure are we that Mattias Samuelsson actually has the juice
mokumboi et AC14 a aimé ceci.
24 avr. à 9 h 48
#4
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,348
Mentions "j'aime": 11,375
The Blues aren't accepting that. I have no idea how they'd feel about Sammy, but I'm fairly sure pushing the 1st until next year and a small winger aren't going to entice. Those items are presumably worth more to the Sabres than they would be to Army.
24 avr. à 10 h 5
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,466
Mentions "j'aime": 1,023
Quoting: mokumboi
The Blues aren't accepting that. I have no idea how they'd feel about Sammy, but I'm fairly sure pushing the 1st until next year and a small winger aren't going to entice. Those items are presumably worth more to the Sabres than they would be to Army.


If the trade happens after the draft then the next 1st is 2025...
24 avr. à 10 h 23
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,626
Mentions "j'aime": 933
Quoting: Chapee44
If the trade happens after the draft then the next 1st is 2025...


Some Blues fans on here are really unreasonable. The Blues would accept this if they decide to trade Buch.
Chapee44 et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
24 avr. à 11 h 11
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 2,783
Mentions "j'aime": 1,421
Quoting: TheEarthmaster
Not necessarily saying no but how sure are we that Mattias Samuelsson actually has the juice


We are in fact not sure that Mattias Samuelsson actually has the juice
BDHockey et TheEarthmaster a aimé ceci.
24 avr. à 11 h 15
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 337
Mentions "j'aime": 92
Quoting: TheEarthmaster
Not necessarily saying no but how sure are we that Mattias Samuelsson actually has the juice


I think he does, he’s been pretty good when I’ve watched him

That being said I’m not a big Rosen believer, would rather someone else
24 avr. à 12 h 3
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2023
Messages: 1,004
Mentions "j'aime": 421
I think the real issue here is that if Buch is willing to 5 x 7.5, then why aren't we signing him??
mokumboi et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
24 avr. à 12 h 30
#10
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,348
Mentions "j'aime": 11,375
Quoting: Chapee44
If the trade happens after the draft then the next 1st is 2025...


Right, but why would they do that? He's not on the block. Someone will have to pry him away.
24 avr. à 12 h 34
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,466
Mentions "j'aime": 1,023
Quoting: mokumboi
Right, but why would they do that? He's not on the block. Someone will have to pry him away.


You're assuming the plan is to re-sign him and that they agree to terms including NTC/NMC etc.
Also from his end that he wants to stay with the team.
Any pending UFA is always discussable as being available because either side might see it as beneficial to get out while there's value on the table.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
24 avr. à 12 h 45
#12
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,348
Mentions "j'aime": 11,375
Quoting: Chapee44
You're assuming the plan is to re-sign him and that they agree to terms including NTC/NMC etc.
Also from his end that he wants to stay with the team.
Any pending UFA is always discussable as being available because either side might see it as beneficial to get out while there's value on the table.


Being discussable and on the block are two very different animals. And what might occur later is irrelevant today. Today, he's not available, but Army is willing to listen because it's the smart thing to do. Doesn't make him available today. If Buch stays past the draft, it's a pretty safe bet he is in STL when the season starts provided no one says magic words.
24 avr. à 13 h 17
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,466
Mentions "j'aime": 1,023
Quoting: mokumboi
Being discussable and on the block are two very different animals. And what might occur later is irrelevant today. Today, he's not available, but Army is willing to listen because it's the smart thing to do. Doesn't make him available today. If Buch stays past the draft, it's a pretty safe bet he is in STL when the season starts provided no one says magic words.


I disagree whole heartedly with this sentiment for all of the reasons I previously stated.
24 avr. à 13 h 48
#14
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,348
Mentions "j'aime": 11,375
Quoting: Chapee44
I disagree whole heartedly with this sentiment for all of the reasons I previously stated.


You disagree that a player openly being offered around and a player a team has no intention of trading are different? Well, okay, but that sort of stance from a bidding team ain't gonna fetch Buch.

And exactly no one is assuming the plan is to re-sign Buch. Army has made that clear repeatedly and publicly.
24 avr. à 14 h 5
#15
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,466
Mentions "j'aime": 1,023
Quoting: mokumboi
You disagree that a player openly being offered around and a player a team has no intention of trading are different? Well, okay, but that sort of stance from a bidding team ain't gonna fetch Buch.

And exactly no one is assuming the plan is to re-sign Buch. Army has made that clear repeatedly and publicly.


No I disagree that it should be assumed the player even wants to re-sign. Or that the team wants to re-sign him.
At this point that offer is as competitive as you're gonna get for him. A 2LD(upside) plus a mid-1st round prospect coming off a solid AHL year and an unprotected 1st in the upcoming draft is a haul.
24 avr. à 15 h 14
#16
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,348
Mentions "j'aime": 11,375
Quoting: Chapee44
No I disagree that it should be assumed the player even wants to re-sign. Or that the team wants to re-sign him.
At this point that offer is as competitive as you're gonna get for him. A 2LD(upside) plus a mid-1st round prospect coming off a solid AHL year and an unprotected 1st in the upcoming draft is a haul.


Again, nobody is assuming the Blues want to extend Buch. This has been well established. And the Blues are not courting offers. Also well established. I mean, you can throw a pile of ifs across a passage time and anything becomes possible. Right now is the situation right now.
24 avr. à 17 h 35
#17
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,466
Mentions "j'aime": 1,023
Quoting: mokumboi
Again, nobody is assuming the Blues want to extend Buch. This has been well established. And the Blues are not courting offers. Also well established. I mean, you can throw a pile of ifs across a passage time and anything becomes possible. Right now is the situation right now.


Right which is that he could be available for a fair price if extension talks don't pick up, which this is more than fair.
24 avr. à 17 h 47
#18
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,348
Mentions "j'aime": 11,375
Quoting: Chapee44
Right which is that he could be available for a fair price if extension talks don't pick up, which this is more than fair.


First of all...

https://www.nhl.com/blues/news/armstrong-buchnevich-open-to-extension-talks

Secondly, value to one team is not always going to be the same value to another. There's value, and then there's the right value. Unless Army is madly in love with Sammy, this is not the right value. The Blues would be much happier with less value in the right pieces. Which you guys definitely have a lot of.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage