SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Easy decisions

Créé par: NARC311
Équipe: 2024-25 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 19 avr. 2024
Publié: 19 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2950 000 $
1900 000 $
21 400 000 $
54 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
710 500 000 $
21 250 000 $
1775 000 $
Transactions
ANA
  1. Pageau, Jean-Gabriel
  2. Pulock, Ryan
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (NYI)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (NYI)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de ANA
Logo de EDM
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de ANA
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2025
Logo de ANA
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
Logo de ANA
Logo de TOR
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de EDM
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2026
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 500 000 $72 944 167 $0 $7 500 000 $14 555 833 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance950 000 $$950K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 250 000 $$3M)
C
RFA - 2
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
AD
UFA
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 650 000 $3 650 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 6
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Islanders de New York
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
775 000 $775 000 $
AG
UFA
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AD
UFA
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
AD
RFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DG/DD
RFA
Logo de Islanders de New York
6 150 000 $6 150 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance800 000 $$800K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
812 500 $812 500 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
844 167 $844 167 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DG/DD
RFA
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
900 000 $900 000 $
DD
RFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
19 avr. à 13 h 58
#1
LosPatos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 3,356
Mentions "j'aime": 1,880
Why would the Ducks ever do this trade. Two 30+ players for Zegras? Cmon man.
19 avr. à 14 h 7
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2023
Messages: 241
Mentions "j'aime": 95
personality I would pass but wonder what other islanders fans thin k
19 avr. à 14 h 7
#3
Démarrer sujet
NHL Insider
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 2,010
Mentions "j'aime": 713
Quoting: LosPatos
Why would the Ducks ever do this trade. Two 30+ players for Zegras? Cmon man.


Need solid defensive players to move this team forward, bud

Not to mention those enticing 2025 picks, pal
19 avr. à 14 h 9
#4
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,473
Mentions "j'aime": 25,367
Some interesting, outside-the-usual-box thinking here. I commend you for your imagination.

Personally, I'd re-sign RFAs Max Jones and Isac Lundestrom, but Stenlund is a nice idea. (If not re-signed, the RFAs have some modest trade value.) I'm not a fan of the Fowler-Pageau part of the Zegras deal, though.

I wouldn't be willing to commit to Jackson LaCombe that long-term just yet.

Bottom line: I think that all of these ideas have some merit. I don't think any of them can be rejected out of hand as unrealistic.
Jded et NARC311 a aimé ceci.
19 avr. à 14 h 46
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,740
Mentions "j'aime": 1,774
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Some interesting, outside-the-usual-box thinking here. I commend you for your imagination.

Personally, I'd re-sign RFAs Max Jones and Isac Lundestrom, but Stenlund is a nice idea. (If not re-signed, the RFAs have some modest trade value.) I'm not a fan of the Fowler-Pageau part of the Zegras deal, though.

I wouldn't be willing to commit to Jackson LaCombe that long-term just yet.

Bottom line: I think that all of these ideas have some merit. I don't think any of them can be rejected out of hand as unrealistic.


Also commend the creative thinking (another MTL Zegras trade for multiple late firsts is 🤮). That said, a few thoughts:

JPG will be expiring when ANA hits their compete window, that’s not attractive. Pulock is solid, but he’ll be 32/33 when we’re competing as well. If we move Z it really only makes sense to do so for a similarly aged player at a position of need should we draft Lindstrom (making a LW expendable). A 1st and 2nd is nice value, but ANA needs young impact players as they try to exit the rebuild. If feels like this hits the two ends of the spectrum (older vets and then picks) but not the sweet spot for ANA in the middle. A Dobson trade for Zegras+ if we draft Lindstrom would be great, but I don’t think NYI would be interested. All of this moot if we can just snag Levshunov. Zero issues with Zegras’ defensive efforts since he returned from injury, and our offensive woes are just as bad as our defense, and he’s our best and most creative producer on offense

Vaak was just scratched for the likes of a Lindstrom/Lageson pairing. Unlikely for a 2 year deal, but I personally like his game

Lacombe is not at all proven enough for $4.5M or that term. I personally think he should be a trade chip this offseason

I’m cool letting Jones go, Lunde is worth a 4C spot, but also okay letting him go as well

Personally prefer overpaying Stammer for 2 years vs tying up Rein for 7, but would still totally take it
19 avr. à 14 h 46
#6
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 9,961
Mentions "j'aime": 6,756
Quoting: NARC311
Need solid defensive players to move this team forward, bud

Not to mention those enticing 2025 picks, pal


We can get ones that will actually be around long term if the cost is Zegras. This trade is horrid for us.
GeneralLandro a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage