SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

One more run

Équipe: 2024-25 Islanders de New York
Date de création initiale: 19 avr. 2024
Publié: 19 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
31 000 000 $
31 000 000 $
31 200 000 $
31 150 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
46 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
NYI
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2026 (NSH)
NSH
  1. Pageau, Jean-Gabriel
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (NYI)
2.
NYI
  1. Reichel, Lukas [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (OTT)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de NYI
Logo de OTT
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
2025
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
2026
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
Logo de NSH
Logo de NYI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2287 700 000 $87 645 000 $0 $80 000 $55 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Logo de Islanders de New York
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Islanders de New York
9 150 000 $9 150 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 7
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Islanders de New York
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Islanders de New York
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Islanders de New York
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Islanders de New York
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Islanders de New York
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Islanders de New York
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, C
RFA
Logo de Islanders de New York
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Islanders de New York
870 000 $870 000 $ (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
AD
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Islanders de New York
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Islanders de New York
6 150 000 $6 150 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Islanders de New York
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Islanders de New York
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Islanders de New York
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Islanders de New York
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Islanders de New York
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG
UFA
Logo de Islanders de New York
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 6
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Islanders de New York
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Islanders de New York
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
19 avr. à 8 h 59
#1
Snowhawk
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 2,484
Mentions "j'aime": 3,561
If Lou called Davidson with that offer this early in the morning, Kyle would probably advise him that morning drinking is a clear indication of a serious problem.
Hawksguy81, exo2769, Garak and 2 others a aimé ceci.
19 avr. à 9 h 5
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2024
Messages: 96
Mentions "j'aime": 73
blackhawks fans are about to raid your comments, take cover
Hudsonfaschingisdad, Hawksguy81, exo2769 and 3 others a aimé ceci.
19 avr. à 9 h 6
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2023
Messages: 250
Mentions "j'aime": 96
Quoting: itzRavai
blackhawks fans are about to raid your comments, take cover


Ik, don’t really care tho
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
19 avr. à 9 h 18
#4
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,775
Mentions "j'aime": 9,948
Quoting: itzRavai
blackhawks fans are about to raid your comments, take cover


As they should!
Garak, PaulKorea et SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
19 avr. à 9 h 18
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 8,987
Mentions "j'aime": 10,882
Hawks obviously decline that Reichel proposal. But they would accept that trade for JGP, so that's something...
Garak, PaulKorea, exo2769 and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
19 avr. à 9 h 22
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2023
Messages: 250
Mentions "j'aime": 96
Quoting: Hawksguy81
Hawks obviously decline that Reichel proposal. But they would accept that trade for JGP, so that's something...


Really think it’s obvious. Holmstrom was the better player last year
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
19 avr. à 9 h 24
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,153
Mentions "j'aime": 11,027
Holmstrom obviously had the better season, but I doubt CHI would be willing to punt on Reichel unless they were getting a 1st, and even that is a stretch.
Hudsonfaschingisdad, exo2769, PaulKorea and 2 others a aimé ceci.
19 avr. à 9 h 27
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 1,247
Mentions "j'aime": 1,544
Hawks counter with Mrazek & 3rd for Sorokin.
PaulKorea, exo2769 et Garak a aimé ceci.
19 avr. à 9 h 28
#9
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,775
Mentions "j'aime": 9,948
Quoting: Hudsonfaschingisdad
Really think it’s obvious. Holmstrom was the better player last year


I'm not sure that's the point though. Do you give up on a prospect that you've been developing so early on? The Hawks are in a place (2nd to last) where they need to find out what they have. I'd be really upset if the Hawks started to trade away their prospects without really giving them a chance. You can't excel as an organization without developing players.
Hudsonfaschingisdad, SociallyHawkward, PaulKorea and 2 others a aimé ceci.
19 avr. à 9 h 30
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2023
Messages: 250
Mentions "j'aime": 96
Quoting: klassic
Hawks counter with Mrazek & 3rd for Sorokin.


It isn’t that really bad of an offer for Reichel
19 avr. à 9 h 53
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 818
Mentions "j'aime": 1,264
Quoting: Hudsonfaschingisdad
Really think it’s obvious. Holmstrom was the better player last year


If that's the case, then why are the Islanders downgrading for "one more run"?
Garak a aimé ceci.
19 avr. à 10 h 13
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2023
Messages: 250
Mentions "j'aime": 96
Quoting: PaulKorea
If that's the case, then why are the Islanders downgrading for "one more run"?


Would fit our system better
19 avr. à 11 h 19
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,153
Mentions "j'aime": 11,027
Quoting: Hudsonfaschingisdad
Would fit our system better


Reichel came into this season having put on 10 lbs, and being specifically asked to step right into a 2nd line 2-way center NHL role, which he had never really played before. They were specifically focusing on and trying to develop his off puck and defensive play for a large portion of the 23-24 season. When things weren't working and they finally decided to pull the rug and move him back to wing, his confidence was shot. They pushed it as long as they could before sending him down to the AHL to get his confidence up and find his game again. So, there is a difference between having a "bad" season, and having a developmental season.

Holmstrom had the luxury of being on a significantly better team with better players, in a set role, and being able to just go out and play his game. Although, the Isles have had their struggles and hardships this season, Reichel was obviously in a much trickier and tougher situation.

I believe with another strong showing in the AHL playoffs, a good summer of training and rest, and settling into a winger role from the start next season, it will quickly become obvious that Reichel is the better and more desirable player in comparison to Holmstrom, and I think you know that, too. If y'all want to move Homstrom, I believe there is a price at which CHI might have interest, but it is very unlikely CHI does anything like this. Reichel fits CHI's system just fine, they are just a young developing team who ran some experiments that didn't work out. I wouldn't at all be surprised if CHI moved Reichel, but I doubt it would be for so little.
PaulKorea, Hawksguy81, exo2769 and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
19 avr. à 11 h 46
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 8,987
Mentions "j'aime": 10,882
Quoting: Hudsonfaschingisdad
Really think it’s obvious. Holmstrom was the better player last year


If we are making judgements on players abilities based off of one season, your correct. Holmstrom was the better player this season. But if you look at the entire body of work of both guys since they turned pro, I'd offer that Reichel has been the better player.

So to me, yes, it's obvious. Especially with that pick going to the Isles as well. Reichel was very good over the final month of the season after going to Rockford for a reboot. The Hawks TOTALLY mishandled Reichel early in the season by putting him at center. Terrible decision. Messed w/ Reichel's head and his confidence. Reichel has far more upside than Holmstrom in my opinion. And the Hawks have no reason or incentive to trade him for a player who is at best a lateral move.
Garak a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage