SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

End of Season Player Grades

Créé par: newman23
Équipe: 2023-24 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 17 avr. 2024
Publié: 17 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
A: Positive performance nearly every game
B: Positive performance majority of games
C: Roughly similar amount of positive and negative performances
D: Negative performance majority of games
F: Negative performance nearly every game
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Not Enough, Data
11 000 000 $
A Season, Grade
11 000 000 $
B Season, Grade
11 000 000 $
C Season, Grade
11 000 000 $
D Season, Grade
11 000 000 $
F Season, Grade
11 000 000 $
Mrazek, Petr
11 000 000 $
Soderblom, Arvid
11 000 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Frais appliqués
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de LAK
Logo de VAN
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de NSH
Logo de CHI
2025
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de DAL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2026
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
3883 500 000 $81 430 957 $0 $6 477 500 $2 069 043 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
A Season, Grade
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
B Season, Grade
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C Season, Grade
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
Mrazek, Petr
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
D Season, Grade
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
F Season, Grade
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance505 000 $$505K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Soderblom, Arvid
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
859 167 $859 167 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
758 333 $758 333 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 833 $850 833 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Not Enough, Data
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
912 500 $912 500 $ (Bonis de performance25 000 $$25K)
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
855 833 $855 833 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 avr. à 15 h 43
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 1,133
Mentions "j'aime": 1,358
I agree with most of these...the only thing I will say is that Reichel has looked quite a bit better since returning from the AHL. Hopefully he can continue to build on that next year.
newman23 et Garak a aimé ceci.
17 avr. à 15 h 49
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,296
Mentions "j'aime": 666
Quoting: DangleCat
I agree with most of these...the only thing I will say is that Reichel has looked quite a bit better since returning from the AHL. Hopefully he can continue to build on that next year.


Completely agree, he hasnt been the player most hawks fans expected to see until these last 15 or so games but I still have full faith in him to become an impact forward at the NHL level. Shame it took him so long to get his footing this season. I think all the injuries and inconsistent linemates really hamstrung him this year too
DangleCat et Garak a aimé ceci.
17 avr. à 15 h 55
#3
Number 1 Kahun Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 1,602
Mentions "j'aime": 1,023
Fair assessment only one that I disagree with is Megna. Dude was a waiver claim and expected to play murphys role in his stead. Going from 7th d/ahl tweener to the #4 is a lot to ask of someone and he did fine in that role. F is too harsh but C/D would be better imo.
Garak a aimé ceci.
17 avr. à 16 h 20
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,296
Mentions "j'aime": 666
Quoting: CFMan
Fair assessment only one that I disagree with is Megna. Dude was a waiver claim and expected to play murphys role in his stead. Going from 7th d/ahl tweener to the #4 is a lot to ask of someone and he did fine in that role. F is too harsh but C/D would be better imo.


Understand your viewpoint. IMO its not entirely megnas fault bc he doesnt control his usage but hes just not an NHL player and pairing him with korchinski hurt KKs development this season so its hard for me to say he didnt have a negative impact most nights, even if he played fine for what he is.

Hindsight is 20/20 but I think it wouldve been beneficial long term for korchinski if davidson had gone out and paid a 4th for collin miller or troy stetcher if he thought murphy could miss significant time this year.
CFMan et Garak a aimé ceci.
17 avr. à 18 h 49
#5
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,684
Mentions "j'aime": 9,837
I agree with most of these too. Probably would have put AA as not enough if we're talking just this year's performance. Really pretty disappointed with TRad. I had a lot of hopes for him. Hopefully he finds his place.
Garak et newman23 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage