SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Playoffs

Créé par: NucksnOilers
Équipe: 2024-25 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 8 avr. 2024
Publié: 8 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Giving UPL the Gustavsson contract
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
33 850 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
35 500 000 $
21 750 000 $
11 250 000 $
Transactions
1.
BUF
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (WPG)
SJS
  1. Jokiharju, Henri [Droits de RFA]
2.
BUF
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (ANA)
Détails additionnels:
Expected return? (DOESN'T HAVE TO BE ANAHEIM)
ANA
  1. Krebs, Peyton [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
Where does he fit in?? He hasn't had any success in Buffalo and his clock is ticking fast. You could slot him in the 4th line but he's not going to be happy about that.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de ANA
Logo de BUF
Logo de PHI
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de FLA
2025
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de MIN
Logo de WPG
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de NSH
Logo de WSH
2026
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2187 700 000 $80 374 403 $0 $2 500 000 $7 325 597 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance650 000 $$650K)
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
7 142 857 $7 142 857 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
7 100 000 $7 100 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
855 833 $855 833 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
918 333 $918 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AG, C
UFA
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 8
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 285 714 $4 285 714 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
8 350 000 $8 350 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
G
RFA
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 333 333 $3 333 333 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
8 avr. à 14 h 33
#1
Sabres fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 4,908
Mentions "j'aime": 3,052
The Luukkonen contract is fine, but giving away Krebs and Jokiharju for nothing makes no sense.
8 avr. à 14 h 42
#2
Démarrer sujet
Save Mcdavid
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 2,878
Mentions "j'aime": 1,244
Quoting: Tjm220
The Luukkonen contract is fine, but giving away Krebs and Jokiharju for nothing makes no sense.


What room is there for either of them? Krebs doesn't have any room in the middle 6 at all and Jokiharju doesn't have any room in the bottom 4. Both of these guys are going to be RFA's and teams will know Buffalo has no space for either of them so why would they pay top dollar when they can just wait for them to be on open market? Krebs just isn't good enough to be a 3C on a playoff contending team like the Sabers want to be (Adams job might depend on it) so he won't fit there and there needs to be room for Johnson so play so Jokiharju won't have a spot either
8 avr. à 15 h 24
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 2,130
Mentions "j'aime": 2,019
Quoting: NucksnOilers
What room is there for either of them? Krebs doesn't have any room in the middle 6 at all and Jokiharju doesn't have any room in the bottom 4. Both of these guys are going to be RFA's and teams will know Buffalo has no space for either of them so why would they pay top dollar when they can just wait for them to be on open market? Krebs just isn't good enough to be a 3C on a playoff contending team like the Sabers want to be (Adams job might depend on it) so he won't fit there and there needs to be room for Johnson so play so Jokiharju won't have a spot either


But even when there isn’t room with organizations, teams still seem to get appropriate value for their assets. A team would have to pay that price as they both are decent enough assets that there will be more than 1 suitor for each. They each can be a secondary piece within a bigger trade, not useless picks. ****, the corpse of Eric Johnson just pulled a 4th and he’s significantly worse than Joki, like in every way possible except for that one time he got dragged into a SC win with the Avs. Add in both play premium positions, selling low just doesn’t make sense
Tjm220 a aimé ceci.
8 avr. à 16 h 33
#4
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 9,975
Mentions "j'aime": 6,766
Quoting: Lsendel3
But even when there isn’t room with organizations, teams still seem to get appropriate value for their assets. A team would have to pay that price as they both are decent enough assets that there will be more than 1 suitor for each. They each can be a secondary piece within a bigger trade, not useless picks. ****, the corpse of Eric Johnson just pulled a 4th and he’s significantly worse than Joki, like in every way possible except for that one time he got dragged into a SC win with the Avs. Add in both play premium positions, selling low just doesn’t make sense


A team loading up on playoff depth, grit, and experience is way different than trading for RFA rights.

Exactly what do you think you're going to get for these guys? Krebs is a reclamation project at this point.

OP, to answer your question of where Krebs fits, Pittsburgh, Boston, any team with a weak prospect system that has a spot in their bottom 6 to let him figure stuff out. Hell, maybe offer him to Colorado for Colton.
8 avr. à 17 h 8
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 2,130
Mentions "j'aime": 2,019
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
A team loading up on playoff depth, grit, and experience is way different than trading for RFA rights.

Exactly what do you think you're going to get for these guys? Krebs is a reclamation project at this point.

OP, to answer your question of where Krebs fits, Pittsburgh, Boston, any team with a weak prospect system that has a spot in their bottom 6 to let him figure stuff out. Hell, maybe offer him to Colorado for Colton.


I said they should be part of a bigger package. Not sold off as individual parts. Krebs as a solid defensive player probably holds late second round valueish when applied to a larger deal. And Joki a RHD which always gets traded for over value. Selling off at the lowest value possible is just bad business. And yeah, I’ve seen plenty of LAK proposals of a Turcotte swap or like you mentioned a Colton swap.
8 avr. à 17 h 58
#6
Sabres fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 4,908
Mentions "j'aime": 3,052
Quoting: NucksnOilers
What room is there for either of them? Krebs doesn't have any room in the middle 6 at all and Jokiharju doesn't have any room in the bottom 4. Both of these guys are going to be RFA's and teams will know Buffalo has no space for either of them so why would they pay top dollar when they can just wait for them to be on open market? Krebs just isn't good enough to be a 3C on a playoff contending team like the Sabers want to be (Adams job might depend on it) so he won't fit there and there needs to be room for Johnson so play so Jokiharju won't have a spot either


Quoting: Lsendel3
But even when there isn’t room with organizations, teams still seem to get appropriate value for their assets. A team would have to pay that price as they both are decent enough assets that there will be more than 1 suitor for each. They each can be a secondary piece within a bigger trade, not useless picks. ****, the corpse of Eric Johnson just pulled a 4th and he’s significantly worse than Joki, like in every way possible except for that one time he got dragged into a SC win with the Avs. Add in both play premium positions, selling low just doesn’t make sense


Basically, those who responded after me said everything that would need to be said about this. You don’t give away decent assets for nothing, even if you don’t need them. Buffalo isn’t just going to not qualify those 2 just because they don’t have an immediate spot in the lineup for them. They might not even let Bryson walk even if they probably should. both have trade value, and if they aim to move either of them, they will get fair compensation. Anything less is just mismanagement of assets that they cannot afford to do. A player like Ross Colton would be exactly what Buffalo is looking for, that’s a great option.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage