SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Hughes Your Daddy

Créé par: Prime_Jimbo
Équipe: 2024-25 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 7 avr. 2024
Publié: 7 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Hughes D Petey and Struble the future LHD
DeMelo Willander Woo/Kovacevic/? the future RHD

Maybe add Beck or Kidney in this deal too
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3950 000 $
2775 000 $
2775 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 000 000 $
21 000 000 $
2825 000 $
2825 000 $
2825 000 $
2825 000 $
1813 500 $
2775 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
55 500 000 $
46 000 000 $
15 500 000 $
11 600 000 $
24 500 000 $
43 000 000 $
23 200 000 $
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Kovacevic, Johnathan
  2. Struble, Jayden
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (WPG)
MTL
  1. Hronek, Filip [Droits de RFA]
2.
VAN
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2024 (NSH)
CHI
  1. Mikheyev, Ilya
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (VAN)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de WPG
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de NSH
Logo de VAN
Logo de SJS
Logo de VAN
2025
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2026
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 700 000 $87 655 834 $0 $57 500 $44 166 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
11 600 000 $11 600 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 8
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C, AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG
UFA
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
C
UFA
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
C, AD
UFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 2
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
RFA
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
867 500 $867 500 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
766 667 $766 667 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
775 000 $775 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
775 000 $775 000 $
DD
RFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
7 avr. à 16 h 42
#1
Sennecke is a gem
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2022
Messages: 4,172
Mentions "j'aime": 2,303
Depending on how much Hronek would want for the new contract, we would really consider. He'd be our top pair guy for at least 2-3 years, probably more
7 avr. à 16 h 57
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,176
Mentions "j'aime": 9,406
I’d want a better return if we move Hronek. The 1st is a good start (although I’d rather an impact NHL player, but we could flip the pick for that after) but Kovacevic and Struble don’t move the needle enough
Prime_Jimbo a aimé ceci.
7 avr. à 17 h 38
#3
Démarrer sujet
VAN
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 6,182
Mentions "j'aime": 1,883
Quoting: mv21227
I’d want a better return if we move Hronek. The 1st is a good start (although I’d rather an impact NHL player, but we could flip the pick for that after) but Kovacevic and Struble don’t move the needle enough


Ya, I'd probably be keen on a center prospect.

I think Struble is solid defensively and prime for a decade plus solid NHL dman. Skates well and physical. Less fussed about Kovacevic.
7 avr. à 17 h 39
#4
Prime Primeau
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 5,463
Mentions "j'aime": 2,172
Quoting: mv21227
I’d want a better return if we move Hronek. The 1st is a good start (although I’d rather an impact NHL player, but we could flip the pick for that after) but Kovacevic and Struble don’t move the needle enough


Maybe replace Struble with Barron as this move will push him out to 4th on our depth chart
7 avr. à 17 h 40
#5
Démarrer sujet
VAN
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 6,182
Mentions "j'aime": 1,883
Modifié 7 avr. à 17 h 47
Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
Maybe replace Struble with Barron as this move will push him out to 4th on our depth chart


Would you call me greedy for suggesting WIN 1st + Struble + Barron?
7 avr. à 17 h 44
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,176
Mentions "j'aime": 9,406
Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
Maybe replace Struble with Barron as this move will push him out to 4th on our depth chart


I do like Barron but I still would hope the Canucks could get a bit better of an offer if they move Hronek. But I wouldn’t absolutely hate the WPG 1st + Barron + Kovacevic (or another piece if we only want to acquire one RHD in the trade)

If there’s a trade for an impact NHLer on the table I think I’d rather take that though
GuyGuyGuy et MarsBar a aimé ceci.
7 avr. à 17 h 52
#7
Tony Ferguson Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 55
Mentions "j'aime": 40
Quoting: Prime_Jimbo
Would you call me greedy for suggesting WIN 1st + Struble + Barron?


Nah you have every right to be greedy when trading a guy like Hronek. If I was Vancouver I wouldnt do it, Barron has massive holes in his game that he really hasnt improved on since joining the habs.

I fell like Newhoof¸k could make sense in a such deal
Prime_Jimbo a aimé ceci.
7 avr. à 18 h 2
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 12,769
Mentions "j'aime": 17,401
Quoting: Caufield
Depending on how much Hronek would want for the new contract, we would really consider. He'd be our top pair guy for at least 2-3 years, probably more


I agree with this, value wise, we might even be underpaying but it really depends on how much money Hronek wants to be paid
Prime_Jimbo a aimé ceci.
7 avr. à 18 h 4
#9
Démarrer sujet
VAN
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 6,182
Mentions "j'aime": 1,883
Quoting: Voice_Of_Thruth
Nah you have every right to be greedy when trading a guy like Hronek. If I was Vancouver I wouldnt do it, Barron has massive holes in his game that he really hasnt improved on since joining the habs.

I fell like Newhoof¸k could make sense in a such deal


Joshua-Newhook-Garland could round out a nice top 9.
7 avr. à 18 h 52
#10
Prime Primeau
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 5,463
Mentions "j'aime": 2,172
Quoting: Prime_Jimbo
Would you call me greedy for suggesting WIN 1st + Struble + Barron?


Nah, not really. Hronek is very good and the difference between Struble and Kovacevic isn’t that big
Prime_Jimbo a aimé ceci.
7 avr. à 18 h 53
#11
Prime Primeau
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 5,463
Mentions "j'aime": 2,172
Quoting: mv21227
I do like Barron but I still would hope the Canucks could get a bit better of an offer if they move Hronek. But I wouldn’t absolutely hate the WPG 1st + Barron + Kovacevic (or another piece if we only want to acquire one RHD in the trade)

If there’s a trade for an impact NHLer on the table I think I’d rather take that though


We could offer Matheson for a lateral move
7 avr. à 19 h 3
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,176
Mentions "j'aime": 9,406
Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
We could offer Matheson for a lateral move


The lateral move would likely be for a top 6 forward or another RHD, not a guy like Matheson who’s a LHD and also older (and also imo worse)

Also it wouldn’t work considering the history between Pettersson and Matheson
7 avr. à 19 h 13
#13
Prime Primeau
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 5,463
Mentions "j'aime": 2,172
Quoting: mv21227
The lateral move would likely be for a top 6 forward or another RHD, not a guy like Matheson who’s a LHD and also older (and also imo worse)

Also it wouldn’t work considering the history between Pettersson and Matheson

Yeah fair, we don’t really have that except Dach which we wouldn’t be willing to move.

I keep seeing Matheson and Pettersson history. What did he do?
7 avr. à 19 h 52
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,176
Mentions "j'aime": 9,406
Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
Yeah fair, we don’t really have that except Dach which we wouldn’t be willing to move.

I keep seeing Matheson and Pettersson history. What did he do?


Dach might also be too risky for the Canucks with his injury history. Definitely makes more sense for Montreal to keep him and hope he can stay healthy and live up to his potential

In Pettersson’s rookie year Matheson picked him up and slammed him to the ice after a hit giving him a concussion. The hit itself was fine but it was Matheson picking him up and slamming him to the ice after that was a problem. And Pettersson seemingly still has bad blood with him

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xFIAov-9RUU
GuyGuyGuy a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage