SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Offseason

Créé par: NickC1988
Équipe: 2024-25 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 2 avr. 2024
Publié: 3 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
One more year of cap dumps, try to trade up in the draft.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3950 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
33 500 000 $
1900 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
15 250 000 $
11 250 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (BUF)
BUF
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (TBL)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (CHI)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2026 (OTT)
2.
CHI
  1. Sheary, Conor
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2026 (TBL)
TBL
3.
CHI
  1. Kulak, Brett
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2026 (EDM)
EDM
  1. Raddysh, Taylor [Droits de RFA]
4.
CHI
  1. Holl, Justin
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (DET)
DET
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de BUF
Logo de LAK
Logo de VAN
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de NSH
Logo de CHI
2025
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de DAL
Logo de DET
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2026
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de EDM
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2187 700 000 $68 035 000 $0 $4 500 000 $19 665 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
C
RFA - 2
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, C
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, C
RFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
G
UFA
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
C
RFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
4 avr. à 0 h 9
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 5,686
Mentions "j'aime": 3,756
Wtf would the Sabres do that for ?
wojme a aimé ceci.
4 avr. à 0 h 24
#2
Tank it baby
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 6,299
Mentions "j'aime": 4,298
Detroit buys out Holl for 1.13 mil AAV and keeps the 2nd.
aedoran a aimé ceci.
4 avr. à 0 h 31
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 2,795
Mentions "j'aime": 1,010
TB buries Sheary in the minors for600k first
4 avr. à 0 h 51
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 7,990
Mentions "j'aime": 4,211
Not impressed with how Raddysh is doing this year… no thanks. You can have Kulak though if you want him, but we are not going to pay to move him!
4 avr. à 0 h 53
#5
Démarrer sujet
Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 7,002
Mentions "j'aime": 2,852
Quoting: Dan_the_Man
TB buries Sheary in the minors for600k first


He would still be a cap charge of $850K, which is certainly more manageable, but not great.
4 avr. à 0 h 54
#6
Démarrer sujet
Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 7,002
Mentions "j'aime": 2,852
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
Wtf would the Sabres do that for ?

Because the draft is defense heavy, and they don't need anymore defensemen. Frankly, they don't need many more prospects in general, they've been drafting them for the past 15 years and haven't made the playoffs. Hawks could easily add more picks, it all depends on where Buffalo finishes.
4 avr. à 6 h 59
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 5,715
Mentions "j'aime": 4,783
Quoting: NickC1988
Because the draft is defense heavy, and they don't need anymore defensemen. Frankly, they don't need many more prospects in general, they've been drafting them for the past 15 years and haven't made the playoffs. Hawks could easily add more picks, it all depends on where Buffalo finishes.


Then why would Buffalo take more picks if they don't need anymore D or Prospects. Sabres still need a bona-fide Top 4 RD and a good Power Forward (Lindstrom). If they did Trade the 1st it probably takes more than picks to get them to move it.
wojme a aimé ceci.
4 avr. à 7 h 2
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 7,691
Mentions "j'aime": 5,908
Quoting: NickC1988
Because the draft is defense heavy, and they don't need anymore defensemen. Frankly, they don't need many more prospects in general, they've been drafting them for the past 15 years and haven't made the playoffs. Hawks could easily add more picks, it all depends on where Buffalo finishes.


They don't need anymore prospects, but make a pick swap for more less quality picks to take more less quality prospects. What kinda logic is that?
AntiAnalytics a aimé ceci.
4 avr. à 9 h 44
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 2,795
Mentions "j'aime": 1,010
Quoting: NickC1988
He would still be a cap charge of $850K, which is certainly more manageable, but not great.


Buy him out for a less than 600k way better than paying a 3rd to move him. $583,333 is the buyout cost
4 avr. à 9 h 52
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,297
Mentions "j'aime": 4,946
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
Wtf would the Sabres do that for ?


That hawks 2nd is 34th OA. Not a bad price to move back a few spots.
4 avr. à 10 h 3
#11
Snowhawk
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 2,412
Mentions "j'aime": 3,445
I’m not sure I would do any of this if I’m the Hawks, perhaps the Detroit trade.

Definitely not trading the TB 1st (21), Chicago 2nd (34) and a future 4th for Buffalo’s 1st (11). I really don’t see the difference in the value in potential draft candidates being worth that price. Last year the Hawks got Oliver Moore with TB’s later 1st and Adam Gajan with their own early 2nd round pick. Vancouver took Willander at 11.

I’m also not giving Arvidsson over $5m coming off an injury plagued season.
Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
4 avr. à 10 h 28
#12
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,683
Mentions "j'aime": 9,837
Quoting: wojme
They don't need anymore prospects, but make a pick swap for more less quality picks to take more less quality prospects. What kinda logic is that?


In an ideal world...what are you looking for then? Use that pick for Carter Yakemchuk and continue the build? Use it as a piece toward a veteran winger? OR use it as a piece to move up in the draft for Cayden...who isn't falling thay far down?
4 avr. à 10 h 30
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 8,739
Mentions "j'aime": 10,615
Sorry but I don't see the other teams making any of those 4 trades. Kind of indifferent to the Arvidsson and Copley signings as well. I'd hope the Hawks can fill out their roster openings better than this.
Snowhawk18 a aimé ceci.
4 avr. à 10 h 35
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 7,691
Mentions "j'aime": 5,908
Quoting: exo2769
In an ideal world...what are you looking for then? Use that pick for Carter Yakemchuk and continue the build? Use it as a piece toward a veteran winger? OR use it as a piece to move up in the draft for Cayden...who isn't falling thay far down?


Trade it for a young rfa or pick the best available player and worry about trading pieces away later.
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
4 avr. à 11 h 29
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 5,686
Mentions "j'aime": 3,756
Quoting: NickC1988
Because the draft is defense heavy, and they don't need anymore defensemen. Frankly, they don't need many more prospects in general, they've been drafting them for the past 15 years and haven't made the playoffs. Hawks could easily add more picks, it all depends on where Buffalo finishes.


1- Sabres aren’t trading down
2- no team is trading down that far for just a 2nd

Wishful thinking on your part dude
Pretty unlikely though
4 avr. à 11 h 31
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 5,686
Mentions "j'aime": 3,756
Quoting: Wadejos123
That hawks 2nd is 34th OA. Not a bad price to move back a few spots.


To move back about 10 spots?
No thanks
I don’t think any team does that
4 avr. à 14 h 35
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,297
Mentions "j'aime": 4,946
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
To move back about 10 spots?
No thanks
I don’t think any team does that


Based on any pick chart you want to look at this is an overpay. And those charts are all just based off of former irl trades.
Based on the Sound of Hockey pick value chart: https://soundofhockey.com/2022/06/06/examining-the-value-of-nhl-draft-picks/

Tampa Pick 21 OA: 217.59
34 OA: 121.36
Late 4th: 6.18
Total Points 345.13

Buffalo Pick 11OA: 338.98.

So as you can see the trade above is basically dead even, if not favoring BUF a little. If you don't like it that's fine but to say no team does this just isn't correct.
NickC1988 a aimé ceci.
4 avr. à 14 h 37
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 5,686
Mentions "j'aime": 3,756
Quoting: Wadejos123
Based on any pick chart you want to look at this is an overpay. And those charts are all just based off of former irl trades.
Based on the Sound of Hockey pick value chart: https://soundofhockey.com/2022/06/06/examining-the-value-of-nhl-draft-picks/

Tampa Pick 21 OA: 217.59
34 OA: 121.36
Late 4th: 6.18
Total Points 345.13

Buffalo Pick 11OA: 338.98.

So as you can see the trade above is basically dead even, if not favoring BUF a little. If you don't like it that's fine but to say no team does this just isn't correct.


The VALUE isn’t the problem here
Teams just don’t wanna trade back from pick 10 to pick20
Just doesn’t happen
4 avr. à 22 h 3
#19
Démarrer sujet
Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 7,002
Mentions "j'aime": 2,852
Quoting: wojme
Trade it for a young rfa or pick the best available player and worry about trading pieces away later.


What young RFAs do you think are available? The Hawks are in the same boat and would like to add young RFAs for picks, but who is even available and worth it? Kaliyev? Injury prone Zegras?
4 avr. à 22 h 56
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 7,691
Mentions "j'aime": 5,908
Quoting: NickC1988
What young RFAs do you think are available? The Hawks are in the same boat and would like to add young RFAs for picks, but who is even available and worth it? Kaliyev? Injury prone Zegras?


That'll have to wait until the off season when teams are looking to make trades.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage