SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Last Year of Cap Hell - Aggressive

Créé par: BenghisKHan
Équipe: 2024-25 Wild du Minnesota
Date de création initiale: 1 avr. 2024
Publié: 1 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This is my companion projection to Last Year of Cap Hell - Passive
I could see GMBG going this route. Two biggest problems was depth and weak secondary scoring. Trading draft capital for a younger talent with some cost control addresses both issues. Then resign Fleury and run it back.

The trade for Marchenko is more symbolic than actual I don't think a first round pick will be in play but I could see multiple seconds and potentially prospects like Firstov, Lambos, ect available.

This will make the Wild competitive for a 3rd place spot in the division and a 5-6 overall in the conference at the expense of having significant purchasing power in 2025-26 when the Parise and Suter buyouts fall off.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1900 000 $
1900 000 $
1900 000 $
1900 000 $
1900 000 $
1900 000 $
1900 000 $
1900 000 $
1900 000 $
21 150 000 $
53 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
13 000 000 $
Transactions
MIN
  1. Marchenko, Kirill [Droits de RFA]
CBJ
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (MIN)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (MIN)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de BUF
Logo de MIN
2025
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de TOR
Logo de MIN
2026
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de COL
Logo de MIN
Logo de TOR
Logo de MIN
Logo de SJS
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2287 500 000 $86 656 921 $425 000 $1 950 000 $843 079 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
RFA - 1
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AD
RFA
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, C
RFA
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
775 000 $775 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 575 000 $7 575 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 450 000 $2 450 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $$250K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
DG/DD
RFA
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
1 avr. à 22 h 12
#26
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 4,393
Mentions "j'aime": 884
Quoting: squashmaple
Who’s Cam Severson? Why would Columbus want to buy out Gudbranson? Why would Minnesota move their captain for that?


Sorry got mixed up on the name…but as far as Gudbranson goes, he really is starting to not have much of a role on this team. I like Guddy but he is very limited and Olivier and possibly Malatesta can replace his physicality. I also have a feeling the Jackets may be targeting Adam Jiricek in the draft. Spurgeon is a huge regression risk. For a team that is trying to win now it would make more sense for them to get a younger player who is a mil cheap on the cap hit and signed long term during the duration of their most productive yrs.
1 avr. à 22 h 58
#27
mostly harmless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 6,714
Mentions "j'aime": 3,213
Quoting: Jacketsman61
Sorry got mixed up on the name…but as far as Gudbranson goes, he really is starting to not have much of a role on this team. I like Guddy but he is very limited and Olivier and possibly Malatesta can replace his physicality. I also have a feeling the Jackets may be targeting Adam Jiricek in the draft. Spurgeon is a huge regression risk. For a team that is trying to win now it would make more sense for them to get a younger player who is a mil cheap on the cap hit and signed long term during the duration of their most productive yrs.

Jiricek is expected to go in the middle of the first round and we don't have a pick there, so assuming we're targeting him is a little silly. Gudbranson's role on the team has, if anything, expanded; he's been one of the few Experienced Leaders we can rely on. I'll let Minnesota fans speak on the possibility of a Spurgeon move but personally I wouldn't be so keen on the idea if I were in that position, no matter how good Faber looks.
1 avr. à 23 h 19
#28
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 4,393
Mentions "j'aime": 884
Quoting: Viqsi
Jiricek is expected to go in the middle of the first round and we don't have a pick there, so assuming we're targeting him is a little silly. Gudbranson's role on the team has, if anything, expanded; he's been one of the few Experienced Leaders we can rely on. I'll let Minnesota fans speak on the possibility of a Spurgeon move but personally I wouldn't be so keen on the idea if I were in that position, no matter how good Faber looks.


I saying we possibly trade down. It isn’t completely out of the question. Depending on the deals out there, the New GM, whoever it will be, may be interested in trying to win now.
1 avr. à 23 h 58
#29
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 5,347
Mentions "j'aime": 3,385
Quoting: Jacketsman61
Sorry got mixed up on the name…but as far as Gudbranson goes, he really is starting to not have much of a role on this team. I like Guddy but he is very limited and Olivier and possibly Malatesta can replace his physicality. I also have a feeling the Jackets may be targeting Adam Jiricek in the draft. Spurgeon is a huge regression risk. For a team that is trying to win now it would make more sense for them to get a younger player who is a mil cheap on the cap hit and signed long term during the duration of their most productive yrs.


I'm not touching that Severson contract. Spurgeon's money can be put to better use later on.

And any kind of Rossi for Johnson swap is DOA because it would create a hole at center to acquire a winger.
2 avr. à 0 h 11
#30
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 4,393
Mentions "j'aime": 884
Quoting: Caerii
I'm not touching that Severson contract. Spurgeon's money can be put to better use later on.

And any kind of Rossi for Johnson swap is DOA because it would create a hole at center to acquire a winger.


It really just depends on the future outlook. I mean do you maximize the years of Boldy, Kaprizov and Eriksson Ek or do you try the long game which make more sense financially but shorten the contention window. The teams that win cups are the teams that are aggressive and don’t worry so much about money. Not saying you’re wrong but FO’s think differently.
2 avr. à 0 h 23
#31
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 5,347
Mentions "j'aime": 3,385
Quoting: Jacketsman61
It really just depends on the future outlook. I mean do you maximize the years of Boldy, Kaprizov and Eriksson Ek or do you try the long game which make more sense financially but shorten the contention window. The teams that win cups are the teams that are aggressive and don’t worry so much about money. Not saying you’re wrong but FO’s think differently.


There needs to be a window first before we worry about the window. This deal doesn't do anything to create a window.

If there's a window in a couple years or so, Spurgeon's money can be used to support that window when we know when it is and what we need. Locking it up in Severson isn't aggressive it's just reckless.
2 avr. à 3 h 2
#32
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2024
Messages: 180
Mentions "j'aime": 62
Quoting: Ryminister_92
Side question: at what point do you think it’s fair to consider firing the GM instead?

He’s the one responsible for the terrible cap issues and he’s already fired and hired coaches and nothing has changed. I feel like a fresh view on things might be the way to go


He is not at all to blame for our cap hell. The only good move was to buy out Suter and Parise. He made the right decision.
2 avr. à 5 h 58
#33
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 4,393
Mentions "j'aime": 884
Quoting: Caerii
There needs to be a window first before we worry about the window. This deal doesn't do anything to create a window.

If there's a window in a couple years or so, Spurgeon's money can be used to support that window when we know when it is and what we need. Locking it up in Severson isn't aggressive it's just reckless.


Kaprizov only has two yrs left on his deal. He can walk after that. I am not arguing against your point I am simply implying that if he leaves they may have missed their opportunity.
2 avr. à 8 h 3
#34
not a he )
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 3,193
Mentions "j'aime": 4,334
Quoting: Jacketsman61
Sorry got mixed up on the name…but as far as Gudbranson goes, he really is starting to not have much of a role on this team. I like Guddy but he is very limited and Olivier and possibly Malatesta can replace his physicality. I also have a feeling the Jackets may be targeting Adam Jiricek in the draft. Spurgeon is a huge regression risk. For a team that is trying to win now it would make more sense for them to get a younger player who is a mil cheap on the cap hit and signed long term during the duration of their most productive yrs.


I don't know how you can watch the games and not think Gudbranson doesn't have an extremely important role on the team. Watch them between whistles and on the bench. Every single young player looks to him, especially with Jenner out. Shoot, even when Jenner is there, they're looking at Guddy. He's here for the duration for good reason, even if he's 7D by 2025.

Adam Jiricek is extremely raw and unlikely to see NHL time for at least three years, and probably longer before he's a regular. He is very much not his brother. Moreover, he's a projected mid-to-late first rounder, a pick which the Jackets do not possess and are unlikely to trade up for. He will not be picked in the top five, and frankly I'm insulted you think the Jackets would trade down from a top six pick to the mid teens. Adam Jiricek has absolutely no relation to Erik Gudbranson's roster spot.

Minnesota isn't in a window now, and arguably a young team needs a vet in leadership more than anything. We make the same argument about Jenner all the time. "Risk for regression" is a stupid bogeyman.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage