SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

2024 offseason

Créé par: Richard88
Équipe: 2024-25 Avalanche du Colorado
Date de création initiale: 22 mars 2024
Publié: 22 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
2925 000 $
3925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
86 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
Transactions
COL
    For futures from whoever
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2024
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de SEA
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de NSH
    2025
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    2026
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2287 700 000 $87 491 250 $0 $137 500 $208 750 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    AG, C
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    12 600 000 $12 600 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
    AD, C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    AG, C
    RFA
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
    AD, AG
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    925 000 $925 000 $
    C
    RFA
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    C, AG
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    870 000 $870 000 $ (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
    C, AG, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    896 250 $896 250 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
    AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    775 000 $775 000 $
    AG
    UFA
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    800 000 $800 000 $
    G
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    925 000 $925 000 $
    DG
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    850 000 $850 000 $
    DD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    775 000 $775 000 $
    DG
    UFA

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    22 mars à 9 h 35
    #1
    Representing the 505
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 4,497
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,683
    Wood is an interesting case; I do wonder if anyone will take him for another five years. I guess if it's for FC or a mid-round pick, a team that needs bottom-six help might be interested. Didn't sound like the Avs were keen on bringing Ritchie in next year; probably give him another year in junior. Also doubt Behrens gets to the NHL without going through the AHL first so, good luck to him with that, LOL.
    22 mars à 12 h 55
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 11,427
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,063
    Colton is more likely to get traded than Wood imo, and there is zero chance COL is going to play Ritchie on 3rd line wing as a 19yr old.
    22 mars à 18 h 13
    #3
    Démarrer sujet
    John 3 16
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 9,581
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
    Quoting: Xqb15a
    Colton is more likely to get traded than Wood imo, and there is zero chance COL is going to play Ritchie on 3rd line wing as a 19yr old.


    Colton plays C which makes him more important to the Avs than a winger like Wood.

    Avs aren't afraid of playing young players if they deem them to be ready. Ritchie should get a chance to make the team and get 9 games in camp, and if he's good enough he'll stay.
    22 mars à 18 h 21
    #4
    Démarrer sujet
    John 3 16
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 9,581
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
    Quoting: NMAvsFan
    Wood is an interesting case; I do wonder if anyone will take him for another five years. I guess if it's for FC or a mid-round pick, a team that needs bottom-six help might be interested. Didn't sound like the Avs were keen on bringing Ritchie in next year; probably give him another year in junior. Also doubt Behrens gets to the NHL without going through the AHL first so, good luck to him with that, LOL.


    You could replace Ritchie with a cheap vet or even Duhaime maybe. Same with Behrens. Point here is the caphits.
    22 mars à 20 h 28
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 11,427
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,063
    Quoting: Richard88
    Colton plays C which makes him more important to the Avs than a winger like Wood.

    Avs aren't afraid of playing young players if they deem them to be ready. Ritchie should get a chance to make the team and get 9 games in camp, and if he's good enough he'll stay.

    I agree with C being more valuable but part of giving Colton $4M as 3C was the plan that RyJo would work out at 2c therefore having about $8M committed to 2c 3C, Mittlestadt is going to blow that model up and rightfully so.
    By no means am I advocating trading Colton though some tough choices are coming.

    With Ritchie, and this is strictly my opinion, I think COL has learned the lesson you can’t expect a 19yr old that you have top 6 C expectations to develop as a top 6 C playing bottom 6 winger minutes. Play him a full season in the AHL playing the role there you want him to play in the NHL. Don’t kill the kid having him play a role he hasn’t played probably at all in his hockey career let him continue to develop to his ceiling not his floor and it’s not like you don’t have options on the wing internally with Foudy, Olausson and Kovalenko. And yes COL has forced that on guys like Newhook in the past and it didn’t work out, learn from past mistakes.

    As for Wood they gave him a 6 yr deal for a reason so I really wonder if they don’t want him to be that winger that can help anchor the bottom 6 and his contract gets more and more bearable as the cap goes up because there is a decent chance someone poaches LOC in the summer of 25.
    23 mars à 3 h 51
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    John 3 16
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 9,581
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
    Quoting: Xqb15a
    I agree with C being more valuable but part of giving Colton $4M as 3C was the plan that RyJo would work out at 2c therefore having about $8M committed to 2c 3C, Mittlestadt is going to blow that model up and rightfully so.
    By no means am I advocating trading Colton though some tough choices are coming.

    With Ritchie, and this is strictly my opinion, I think COL has learned the lesson you can’t expect a 19yr old that you have top 6 C expectations to develop as a top 6 C playing bottom 6 winger minutes. Play him a full season in the AHL playing the role there you want him to play in the NHL. Don’t kill the kid having him play a role he hasn’t played probably at all in his hockey career let him continue to develop to his ceiling not his floor and it’s not like you don’t have options on the wing internally with Foudy, Olausson and Kovalenko. And yes COL has forced that on guys like Newhook in the past and it didn’t work out, learn from past mistakes.

    As for Wood they gave him a 6 yr deal for a reason so I really wonder if they don’t want him to be that winger that can help anchor the bottom 6 and his contract gets more and more bearable as the cap goes up because there is a decent chance someone poaches LOC in the summer of 25.


    Ritchie isn't allowed to play in the AHL next year per the NHL/juniors rules. So it's either NHL or back to juniors for him where he's already a dominant top 5 scorer and has little to learn. The Avs sent Byram back to juniors after a similarly dominant season though so maybe they'd be comfortable doing the same with Ritchie. I'd expect them to give him a good look in camp though either way.

    Good point on Mittelstadt changing the cap structure, that's definitely a significant change. That extra $2m will need to be found somewhere. If you move Colton though who plays 3C? Money probably needs to come off the wing first looking at the roster.
    Xqb15a a aimé ceci.
    23 mars à 14 h 55
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2019
    Messages: 3,766
    Mentions "j'aime": 972
    This move only works for one season and then CMac would be in a world of hurt the next offseason. Wood isn't the right move; it has to be Manson or G
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage