Buddy you are so far off value for this trade that's it's not even funny.

Try Reinbacher and MTLs 2nd for Zegras.

Anaheim doesn't need for LDs... they're pretty set in that department.

TBH if I'm Montreal, I'd rather trade your offer over his.

Today I learned that Lane Hutson is nearly as valuable as Trevor Zegras.

LOL.

Hutson's offensive production numbers in the NCAA are better than Zegras' were....

Do I look like I give a ****?

D+2 vs. D+1. Not to mention, know who else outproduced Zegras (And Caufield) in 19-20? David Farrance.

I really can't see you, so have no idea whether you look like you "give a ***** ", or not? Frankly, I don't care how you look. I was simply commenting - just like you champ.

Abandoned ship on the actual argument real quick once counter points came out.

what arguement? I don't see an arguement

Read, genius.

I simply pointed out that Hutson's offensive numbers were greater than Zegras in the NCAA.
It takes more than 1 person to argue, and you are standing by yourself.
Have a spectacular day champ.

Yeah, and you conveniently pussed out when it was noted that Hutson is in his D+2 and that it's not uncommon for inferior prospects to outscore their superiors.

There's no argument because you made a dumb point and ****ed out when it collapsed like a house of cards.

Hutson and Zegras are not nearly the same value. Have a spectacular day, champ.

good one lol

Ehh, realistically you take the proven thing over the potential unless there's a mammoth gap between the two. So hypothetically if you were to compare Zegras and Reinbacher's value, I'd say Montreal would add... But there's not a chance in hell I'd trade Reinbacher for Zegras.

That said, it's about as laughable as the guy that said he'd do Reinbacher and a 2nd before he did Hutson and a 3rd. I'd take Reinbacher over Hutson 8 days a week.

There is truth to that, but not sure a winger (he isn't a good forward) with terrible defensive responsibilities, and a massive dip to production is worth more than a RD, with top-pair potential, even if he hasn't proven in the NHL.

For Hutson though, way more fair value than you are making it out to be. He is the best player at the defense position the NCAA has seen in the past 30 years

Full disclaimer, I'm not a fan of Zegras at all, but "Massive dip to production" isn't really fair. It's pretty clear that what little time he's played this year he wasn't 100%.

I'd never trade Reinbacher for Zegras personally, but without being proven at all in NA hockey yet, I don't think it's all that absurd to say that they'd have to throw a 2nd on him to get a proven player, at the moment. Overall, I think Reinbacher becomes a much more valuable player, but until he's proven his value takes a hit. (Which is why teams rarely trade top prospects)



Rangers fans were saying the same thing about Nils Lundkvist after his 20-21 SHL season lol.

Yeah but then you'd have to consider the other teams needs and most people can't be bothered with that. Plus if consider the other teams you can't offer the same package (of players you want to get rid o)f for every trade.