SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

One massive trade with Ottawa

Créé par: CrownRoyal
Équipe: 2024-25 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 21 mars 2024
Publié: 21 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
The trade is broken down into pieces to try and show my line of thinking.
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Boucher, Tyler
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (OTT)
Détails additionnels:
1st is top 10 protected
2.
CGY
  1. Norris, Joshua
Détails additionnels:
My understanding is Sens fans are basically done with Norris, this would be a high-risk/high-reward deal for Calgary
3.
CGY
  1. Korpisalo, Joonas
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (BOS)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (OTT)
OTT
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (CGY)
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2024 (CGY)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de BOS
Logo de CGY
Logo de DAL
Logo de OTT
Logo de CGY
Logo de VGK
Logo de NJD
2025
Logo de FLA
Logo de OTT
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2026
Logo de CGY
Logo de VGK
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
1987 500 000 $65 322 499 $0 $1 912 500 $22 177 501 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
7 950 000 $7 950 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
787 500 $787 500 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
775 000 $775 000 $
DD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
21 mars à 17 h 30
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,341
Mentions "j'aime": 3,988
massively lopsided in the flames favor; start small, then its more realistic
MoSeider53 a aimé ceci.
21 mars à 17 h 38
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,228
Mentions "j'aime": 4,666
Norris would be a good add, but I would have to believe he’s worth more than that.
21 mars à 17 h 44
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 10,834
Mentions "j'aime": 10,609
Yeah. OTT should be hoping to move Norris for whatever they can get before his situation gets into cap dump territory, especially before that M-NTC kicks in in a couple years. And it seems like at least some OTT fans are on board with that idea. Definitely high risk for CGY, but could pay off if he can get healthy and stay healthy AND get back to playing well. Such a shame this keeps happening to him. Hopefully he can get healthy.
Mike7856 et CrownRoyal a aimé ceci.
21 mars à 18 h 47
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 87
Mentions "j'aime": 31
Quoting: Wqrrior
massively lopsided in the flames favor; start small, then its more realistic


Care to actually elaborate?
21 mars à 18 h 50
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 1,874
Mentions "j'aime": 888
I can appreciate the thinking that was put into this, but a lot of it just isn't there. Ottawa is absolutely not in a position to be trading their 2025 1st, and based on Staios' whole "patience" thing, it seems pretty much all but guaranteed not to happen. Norris, idk, I just wouldn't do it. and Korpisalo, his buyout is really reasonable, the Sens can definitely afford to go that route rather than spending an entire 1st on it. I wouldn't do two 1sts and a 2nd alone to dump Korpisalo and get Markstrom and Mangiapane, and Norris is absolutely not at a "negative value" stage yet
21 mars à 19 h 30
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 87
Mentions "j'aime": 31
Quoting: emoprettyboy
I can appreciate the thinking that was put into this, but a lot of it just isn't there. Ottawa is absolutely not in a position to be trading their 2025 1st, and based on Staios' whole "patience" thing, it seems pretty much all but guaranteed not to happen. Norris, idk, I just wouldn't do it. and Korpisalo, his buyout is really reasonable, the Sens can definitely afford to go that route rather than spending an entire 1st on it. I wouldn't do two 1sts and a 2nd alone to dump Korpisalo and get Markstrom and Mangiapane, and Norris is absolutely not at a "negative value" stage yet

You make some fair points... except no one is suggesting Norris has negative value, Mangiapane is a solid 2nd line winger and I imagine he'd be willing to re-sign.
21 mars à 19 h 52
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 1,874
Mentions "j'aime": 888
Quoting: CrownRoyal
You make some fair points... except no one is suggesting Norris has negative value, Mangiapane is a solid 2nd line winger and I imagine he'd be willing to re-sign.


my “Norris doesn’t have negative value” point was about how I wouldn’t do the deal without Norris, so the only way it’d make sense *with* him would be if he had negative value, which we all agree that he doesn’t
21 mars à 20 h 5
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 87
Mentions "j'aime": 31
Quoting: emoprettyboy
my “Norris doesn’t have negative value” point was about how I wouldn’t do the deal without Norris, so the only way it’d make sense *with* him would be if he had negative value, which we all agree that he doesn’t


There was a reason why I broke it up like I did, even stated it in the description. While you might not agree with the Sens paying to dump Korpi, or giving up a 1st for Markstrom... if you remove those parts, it's Mangiapane for Norris.

It's Korpi that has negative value and with 4 years left, it is a lot of negative value IMO.
21 mars à 20 h 7
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,341
Mentions "j'aime": 3,988
Quoting: CrownRoyal
Care to actually elaborate?


Ottawa is giving up a top 6C (who sure has struggled due to injury, but is still valuable), 2 likely high 1sts, a previous first and a goalie one season removed from a good season for a middle six expiring UFA and a better goalie. That's an awful lot out for the potential of an improved situation in net.
Fergy22 a aimé ceci.
22 mars à 9 h 35
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 7,450
Mentions "j'aime": 3,190
Norris is too much risk. He's injured as often as he's in the lineup. Maybe if his AAV was lower or his contract shorter but 6 more years at virtually 8 mil per is just too much for a player who's hurt that often.

Calgary won't be doing the Korpisalo trade either. They have no need for him.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage