SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

thought exercise

Créé par: sens65
Équipe: 2023-24 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 20 mars 2024
Publié: 20 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Since I've seen a bunch of Shane Pinto trades here. He's not being traded, period.

However, if he was going to be dealt this is what it would take from every team. This is not intended to be realistic, merely what would make it worthwhile for Ottawa.
Transactions
1.
OTT
  1. Gauthier, Cutter [Liste de réserve]
ANA
    Pinto
    2.
    OTT
    1. Hayton, Barrett
    2. Ingram, Connor
    3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (ARI)
    4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (NYR)
    ARI
    3.
    4.
    5.
    6.
    OTT
    1. Suzuki, Ryan
    2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (CAR)
    3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (CAR)
    CAR
    7.
    8.
    OTT
    1. Annunen, Justus
    2. O'Connor, Logan
    3. Olofsson, Fredrik
    4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (COL)
    5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2026 (COL)
    COL
    9.
    OTT
    1. Johnson, Kent
    2. Tarasov, Daniil
    3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (CBJ)
    CBJ
    10.
    11.
    OTT
    1. Berggren, Jonatan
    2. Rasmussen, Michael
    3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (DET)
    DET
    12.
    13.
    14.
    15.
    16.
    OTT
    1. Mailloux, Logan
    2. Newhook, Alex
    3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (WPG)
    MTL
    17.
    18.
    19.
    20.
    21.
    22.
    OTT
    1. Yager, Brayden [Liste de réserve]
    2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (PIT)
    3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2026 (PIT)
    PIT
    23.
    OTT
    1. Bordeleau, Thomas
    2. Ferraro, Mario
    3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (PIT)
    4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (VGK)
    SJS
    24.
    OTT
    1. Kartye, Tye
    2. Tolvanen, Eeli
    3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (SEA)
    SEA
    25.
    OTT
    1. Dean, Zach
    2. Hofer, Joel
    3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
    4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (STL)
    STL
    26.
    OTT
    1. Cernak, Erik
    2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (TBL)
    TBL
    27.
    OTT
    1. Knies, Matthew
    2. Niemelä, Topi
    3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
    TOR
    28.
    OTT
    1. Räty, Aatu
    2. Willander, Tom [Liste de réserve]
    VAN
    29.
    OTT
    1. Thompson, Logan
    2. Whitecloud, Zach
    3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (VGK)
    VGK
    30.
    OTT
    1. Cristall, Andrew
    2. Milano, Sonny
    3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (WSH)
    WSH
    31.
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2024
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de COL
    Logo de DET
    Logo de WPG
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de SEA
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de ARI
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de DET
    Logo de FLA
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de OTT
    2025
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de CBJ
    Logo de STL
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de FLA
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    2026
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de COL
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    7183 500 000 $167 839 048 $0 $11 330 000 $-84 339 048 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    8 205 714 $8 205 714 $
    AG
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    8 350 000 $8 350 000 $
    C
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
    AD, C
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    863 333 $863 333 $
    C, AG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    4 975 000 $4 975 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    835 000 $835 000 $
    C, AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    762 500 $762 500 $
    AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    825 000 $825 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
    C
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    758 333 $758 333 $
    AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    775 000 $775 000 $
    C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
    925 000 $925 000 $
    AD, AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
    AG, C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
    1 775 000 $1 775 000 $
    C, AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
    AD, AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
    1 460 000 $1 460 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
    863 333 $863 333 $
    C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Devils du New Jersey
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    AD, AG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    775 000 $775 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
    AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    859 167 $859 167 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
    AG, C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    894 167 $894 167 $
    C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    863 333 $863 333 $
    AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    925 000 $925 000 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Panthers de la Floride
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    C, AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    905 000 $905 000 $ (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
    AG
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
    C, AG
    RFA - 4
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    916 667 $916 667 $
    C, AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    AG, C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    852 500 $852 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
    C
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    836 667 $836 667 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
    C
    RFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
    1 950 000 $1 950 000 $
    G
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
    DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    805 000 $805 000 $
    DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
    G
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DD
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    775 000 $775 000 $
    G
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    875 000 $875 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
    DD
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
    1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
    G
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Predators de Nashville
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Panthers de la Floride
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    G
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Devils du New Jersey
    4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Wild du Minnesota
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
    G
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Islanders de New York
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Predators de Nashville
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    G
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
    DD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    775 000 $775 000 $
    G
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
    DD
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
    766 667 $766 667 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    5 200 000 $5 200 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    856 667 $856 667 $
    DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
    2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DG/DD, AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
    3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
    DG
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 3
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    775 000 $775 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    7 950 000 $7 950 000 $
    C
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    775 000 $775 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    775 000 $775 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 3

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    20 mars à 15 h 14
    #1
    Mac1010
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2018
    Messages: 1,686
    Mentions "j'aime": 723
    I like Pinto but I think you have seriously over valued him in a number of these trades....
    MoxNix, Beargold et wojme a aimé ceci.
    20 mars à 15 h 15
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 2,727
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,763
    0% ANA considers that at all
    20 mars à 15 h 16
    #3
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2018
    Messages: 7,137
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,490
    Quoting: mm1010
    I like Pinto but I think you have seriously over valued him in a number of these trades....


    Did you read the explanation?
    20 mars à 15 h 16
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2022
    Messages: 7,445
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,188
    Pinto isn't worth that much.
    wojme a aimé ceci.
    20 mars à 15 h 16
    #5
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2018
    Messages: 7,137
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,490
    Quoting: Jded
    0% ANA considers that at all


    Yes!

    That was my point.

    If you read the explanation maybe you'd understand what the point of this ACGM was.
    20 mars à 15 h 18
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 27,861
    Mentions "j'aime": 14,563
    Sure seems like you are telling all teams to ante up their offers. I think I'd fold if I were buffalo. Too much of a gamble
    wojme a aimé ceci.
    20 mars à 15 h 19
    #7
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2018
    Messages: 7,137
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,490
    Quoting: MoxNix
    Pinto isn't worth that much.


    I agree lol. Did you read my explanation?
    20 mars à 15 h 19
    #8
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2018
    Messages: 7,137
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,490
    Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
    Sure seems like you are telling all teams to ante up their offers. I think I'd fold if I were buffalo. Too much of a gamble


    What I'm saying is that teams will only get Pinto if its a significant overpayment.

    I've seen way too many Islanders fans offering Pageau, Wahlstrom and a 1st for him and that just doesn't make any sense for Ottawa.
    20 mars à 15 h 20
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 27,861
    Mentions "j'aime": 14,563
    Quoting: sens65
    What I'm saying is that teams will only get Pinto if its a significant overpayment.


    I said that with a poker face. I know this site can be a crapshoot, but every once in a while you go all in and win a big pot
    sens65 a aimé ceci.
    20 mars à 15 h 21
    #10
    Mac1010
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2018
    Messages: 1,686
    Mentions "j'aime": 723
    Quoting: sens65
    Did you read the explanation?


    yes I did. my point is you are off base. for staios to consider it would be less for almost every single one of your trades. While your point is its not going to happen my point is that it can and for less than what you have here.
    GiggywithGibby et ChestNut33 a aimé ceci.
    20 mars à 15 h 37
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2023
    Messages: 5,635
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,745
    Quoting: sens65
    Yes!

    That was my point.

    If you read the explanation maybe you'd understand what the point of this ACGM was.


    Quoting: sens65
    What I'm saying is that teams will only get Pinto if its a significant overpayment.

    I've seen way too many Islanders fans offering Pageau, Wahlstrom and a 1st for him and that just doesn't make any sense for Ottawa.


    If u just made your point clear from the start,
    then u probably wouldn’t feel the need to respond in a condescending fashion
    Just saying….
    20 mars à 15 h 51
    #12
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2017
    Messages: 7,674
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,898
    You want teams to pay a premium for a 3rd line player?
    MoxNix a aimé ceci.
    20 mars à 16 h 4
    #13
    Future Ducks legend
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2022
    Messages: 9,953
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,747
    Quoting: sens65
    Yes!

    That was my point.

    If you read the explanation maybe you'd understand what the point of this ACGM was.


    Dude, in no world does a 3C land you a top 5 prospect in the league, there's "he's not for sale" and then there's completely out to lunch.
    wojme a aimé ceci.
    20 mars à 16 h 13
    #14
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2023
    Messages: 182
    Mentions "j'aime": 99
    Quoting: sens65
    What I'm saying is that teams will only get Pinto if its a significant overpayment.

    I've seen way too many Islanders fans offering Pageau, Wahlstrom and a 1st for him and that just doesn't make any sense for Ottawa.


    I understand the point of trading Pinto only for big overpayment. But try to make the returning packages somewhere comparable.

    Levi for example ain't anywhere near R. Andersson, Dobson or Bouchard in value. Moving these Ds you're more likely talking about Stützle right now, not Pinto.
    sens65 a aimé ceci.
    20 mars à 16 h 37
    #15
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2018
    Messages: 7,137
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,490
    Quoting: mm1010
    yes I did. my point is you are off base. for staios to consider it would be less for almost every single one of your trades. While your point is its not going to happen my point is that it can and for less than what you have here.


    My point is there's zero logical reason for the Sens to trade Pinto, especially given the fact that Norris has serious injury problems.

    So the only way he gets moved is either if the return is an UPGRADE at forward (someone better than Pinto), or helps solve one of our other problems (a young NHL goalie or RHD).
    20 mars à 16 h 38
    #16
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2018
    Messages: 7,137
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,490
    Quoting: GiggywithGibby
    Dude, in no world does a 3C land you a top 5 prospect in the league, there's "he's not for sale" and then there's completely out to lunch.


    Pinto is tracking to be a high-end 2C with strong defensive skills, that's pretty damn valuable if you ask me.
    StutzlesNumber1Fan a aimé ceci.
    20 mars à 16 h 49
    #17
    Mac1010
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2018
    Messages: 1,686
    Mentions "j'aime": 723
    Quoting: sens65
    My point is there's zero logical reason for the Sens to trade Pinto, especially given the fact that Norris has serious injury problems.

    So the only way he gets moved is either if the return is an UPGRADE at forward (someone better than Pinto), or helps solve one of our other problems (a young NHL goalie or RHD).


    great and if you want to upgrade on pinto a current 3rd line center at about .5ppg you will have to add not the other way around. so if the sens want to make improvements absolutely you should look at upgrading on pinto it will just have the cost on the other side of the equations you have above. the Sens will have to add not the other way around.
    20 mars à 16 h 50
    #18
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2018
    Messages: 7,137
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,490
    Quoting: mm1010
    great and if you want to upgrade on pinto a current 3rd line center at about .5ppg you will have to add not the other way around. so if the sens want to make improvements absolutely you should look at upgrading on pinto it will just have the cost on the other side of the equations you have above. the Sens will have to add not the other way around.


    Pinto is at 0.76 PPG btw. And everyone can see that he's taken huge strides in his game and will not be a 3C for long.
    StutzlesNumber1Fan a aimé ceci.
    20 mars à 16 h 55
    #19
    Mac1010
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2018
    Messages: 1,686
    Mentions "j'aime": 723
    Quoting: sens65
    Pinto is at 0.76 PPG btw. And everyone can see that he's taken huge strides in his game and will not be a 3C for long.


    hmmm my math must be off....63pts in 125 games... let me check oh wait its .504..... that is weird...
    20 mars à 17 h 1
    #20
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2018
    Messages: 7,137
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,490
    Quoting: mm1010
    hmmm my math must be off....63pts in 125 games... let me check oh wait its .504..... that is weird...


    I was referring to his 2023-24 stats.

    That's like saying Zach Hyman is a 0.68 PPG player, like yeah technically that's his career PPG but he is clearly an 80 point player now.
    StutzlesNumber1Fan a aimé ceci.
    20 mars à 17 h 31
    #21
    Mac1010
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2018
    Messages: 1,686
    Mentions "j'aime": 723
    Modifié 21 mars à 12 h 15
    Quoting: sens65
    I was referring to his 2023-24 stats.

    That's like saying Zach Hyman is a 0.68 PPG player, like yeah technically that's his career PPG but he is clearly an 80 point player now.


    my point is 26 games is an extremely small sample size. foegele had 15 points in 15 games during the oilers hot streak not sustainable.
    pinto might be able to sustain higher who knows but 26 games doesnt give the track record to show that.
    Hyman now has a track record to show he can sustain that pace.

    So no i would not call him a .7 ppg player until he can establish it consistently. for now you have to use they his career as that would be what his next contract will be based on.
    GiggywithGibby a aimé ceci.
    21 mars à 4 h 2
    #22
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2024
    Messages: 633
    Mentions "j'aime": 480
    Quoting: wojme
    You want teams to pay a premium for a 3rd line player?


    He's definitely a 2C lol. Josh Norris would be a solid 2C on a lot of teams and Pinto is already better than him.
    21 mars à 4 h 3
    #23
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2024
    Messages: 633
    Mentions "j'aime": 480
    Quoting: sens65
    Pinto is at 0.76 PPG btw. And everyone can see that he's taken huge strides in his game and will not be a 3C for long.


    Not many people watch Sens games lol. Pinto is great at face offs, good defensively, and capable of being a 60-70 point player. He's going to be a very good 2C for a long time.
    sens65 a aimé ceci.
    21 mars à 15 h 52
    #24
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2018
    Messages: 7,137
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,490
    Quoting: StutzlesNumber1Fan
    Not many people watch Sens games lol. Pinto is great at face offs, good defensively, and capable of being a 60-70 point player. He's going to be a very good 2C for a long time.


    Exactly.
    StutzlesNumber1Fan a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage