SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Offseason Series - FLAMES

Créé par: Cabbie91
Équipe: 2024-25 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 19 mars 2024
Publié: 19 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
- Draft Tij Iginla, MIchael Hage and Cole Hutson
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2900 000 $
2900 000 $
1900 000 $
2890 000 $
1890 000 $
2900 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
22 750 000 $
Transactions
CGY
  1. Siegenthaler, Jonas
  2. Stillman, Chase
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (NJD)
NJD
  1. Markström, Jacob (3 000 000 $ retained)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de NJD
Logo de CGY
Logo de DAL
Logo de CGY
Logo de VGK
Logo de CGY
Logo de NJD
Logo de CGY
2025
Logo de FLA
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2026
Logo de CGY
Logo de VGK
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 500 000 $73 986 666 $0 $1 062 500 $13 513 334 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
900 000 $900 000 $
AG
RFA
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
900 000 $900 000 $
G
RFA
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
823 333 $823 333 $
DG
RFA - 1
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flames de Calgary
900 000 $900 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Flames de Calgary
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, C
RFA
Logo de Flames de Calgary
775 000 $775 000 $
DD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
19 mars à 13 h 19
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 1,372
Mentions "j'aime": 1,442
Cant see the Devils moving Siegenthaler in any move
19 mars à 13 h 28
#2
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 11,903
Mentions "j'aime": 3,138
Devils aren't moving a top 10 pick for Markstrom, let alone adding significantly
19 mars à 13 h 30
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 1,014
Mentions "j'aime": 346
Seems like a lot for Marky. Hage seems like a reach at 9 or 12 to me.
19 mars à 13 h 39
#4
"Go sell ice cream!"
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 2,901
Mentions "j'aime": 1,324
Horrible trade for NJD. Also, didn't CGY ownership already block Conroy from trading Markstrom with significant retention? Not sure why they would allow his to be traded in the offseason at 50% retained if they just blocked something similar at the deadline.
19 mars à 13 h 41
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 1,014
Mentions "j'aime": 346
Quoting: jfkst1
Horrible trade for NJD. Also, didn't CGY ownership already block Conroy from trading Markstrom with significant retention? Not sure why they would allow his to be traded in the offseason at 50% retained if they just blocked something similar at the deadline.


I think it was blocked because ownership wanted to stay in the play off hunt.
19 mars à 13 h 46
#6
"Go sell ice cream!"
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 2,901
Mentions "j'aime": 1,324
Quoting: Shaun80
I think it was blocked because ownership wanted to stay in the play off hunt.


Then not sure why the ownership would have any more confidence in Vladar and Wolf this coming season as neither is giving an indication of being able to replace Markstrom.
19 mars à 13 h 57
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 1,014
Mentions "j'aime": 346
Quoting: jfkst1
Then not sure why the ownership would have any more confidence in Vladar and Wolf this coming season as neither is giving an indication of being able to replace Markstrom.


It's easier to trade him away when next seasons a blank slate instead of being 4 points out of the playoffs. I think he'll let the team know he doesn't want to come back next season too.
19 mars à 14 h 28
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 2,615
Mentions "j'aime": 1,079
Seems like a high price to dump Chase Stillman for
19 mars à 16 h 37
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 7,383
Mentions "j'aime": 3,174
Quoting: jfkst1
Then not sure why the ownership would have any more confidence in Vladar and Wolf this coming season as neither is giving an indication of being able to replace Markstrom.


Obviously you haven't seen Wolf play lately. He's the main reason Calgary beat Vegas and Montreal. Wolf had a .947 save percentage vs Montreal with a bunch of big saves in a game Calgary won 5-2 in spite of being outshot 38-28. The game before that vs Vegas Calgary won 4-1 behind Wolf's .966 save percentage.
19 mars à 17 h 16
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,193
Mentions "j'aime": 18,359
Better get three Markstroms at that price
19 mars à 18 h 21
#11
"Go sell ice cream!"
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 2,901
Mentions "j'aime": 1,324
Quoting: MoxNix
Obviously you haven't seen Wolf play lately. He's the main reason Calgary beat Vegas and Montreal. Wolf had a .947 save percentage vs Montreal with a bunch of big saves in a game Calgary won 5-2 in spite of being outshot 38-28. The game before that vs Vegas Calgary won 4-1 behind Wolf's .966 save percentage.


Obviously you haven't watched NHL hockey for very long. Taking a tiny sample and extrapolating that into a player's future value whilst ignoring the larger collective body of work is asking for issues.
19 mars à 18 h 54
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 7,383
Mentions "j'aime": 3,174
Quoting: jfkst1
Obviously you haven't watched NHL hockey for very long. Taking a tiny sample and extrapolating that into a player's future value whilst ignoring the larger collective body of work is asking for issues.


Ok you're just another nut using strawman arguments.
20 mars à 9 h 47
#13
"Go sell ice cream!"
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 2,901
Mentions "j'aime": 1,324
Quoting: MoxNix
Ok you're just another nut using strawman arguments.


32/32 GMs would agree with my opinion over yours. CGY ownership reached this very conclusion several weeks ago. But I'm just a "nut" because I thoroughly dismantled your argument of trusting an underachieving player with no record of starting goalie play at the goalie position that has extreme inconsistency inherent in the position. I'm a "nut" for responding to you actually.
20 mars à 13 h 1
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 7,383
Mentions "j'aime": 3,174
Quoting: jfkst1
32/32 GMs would agree with my opinion over yours. CGY ownership reached this very conclusion several weeks ago. But I'm just a "nut" because I thoroughly dismantled your argument of trusting an underachieving player with no record of starting goalie play at the goalie position that has extreme inconsistency inherent in the position. I'm a "nut" for responding to you actually.


You dismantled nothing. Your claiming I said something I did not say and then saying that's wrong is the very definition of a strawman argument. Yes that makes you a nut.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage