SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Florida Pt 2

Créé par: mhmhvancouver
Équipe: 2024-25 Panthers de la Floride
Date de création initiale: 11 mars 2024
Publié: 12 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
2925 000 $
2850 000 $
3800 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
1850 000 $
1800 000 $
2900 000 $
2800 000 $
1800 000 $
2800 000 $
2825 000 $
2825 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1825 000 $
1800 000 $
2900 000 $
21 650 000 $
2800 000 $
1800 000 $
11 050 000 $
89 750 000 $
2800 000 $
Transactions
1.
FLA
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (PIT)
PIT
    Anthony Stolarz
    2.
    FLA
    1. Mukhamadullin, Shakir
    2. Russell, Mitchell
    3. Thompson, Jack
    4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (VGK)
    5. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (SJS)
    SJS
    1. Lundell, Anton [Droits de RFA]
    3.
    FLA
    1. Kaut, Martin [Liste de réserve]
    SJS
    1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2026 (FLA)
    4.
    FLA
    1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2026 (ANA)
    Rachats de contrats
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2024
    Logo de FLA
    Logo de FLA
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de FLA
    2025
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de FLA
    Logo de FLA
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de FLA
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de FLA
    2026
    Logo de FLA
    Logo de FLA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de FLA
    Logo de FLA
    Logo de FLA
    Logo de FLA
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2383 500 000 $84 400 001 $0 $400 000 $-900 001 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Panthers de la Floride
    9 750 000 $9 750 000 $
    AD
    UFA
    Logo de Panthers de la Floride
    10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Panthers de la Floride
    9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
    AD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Panthers de la Floride
    4 166 667 $4 166 667 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Panthers de la Floride
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Panthers de la Floride
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Panthers de la Floride
    900 000 $900 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA
    Logo de Panthers de la Floride
    4 425 000 $4 425 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Panthers de la Floride
    925 000 $925 000 $
    AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Panthers de la Floride
    800 000 $800 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA
    Logo de Panthers de la Floride
    847 500 $847 500 $
    C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Panthers de la Floride
    800 000 $800 000 $
    AG, C
    RFA
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Panthers de la Floride
    5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Panthers de la Floride
    7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Panthers de la Floride
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    G
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
    DG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Panthers de la Floride
    825 000 $825 000 $
    DG/DD
    RFA
    Logo de Panthers de la Floride
    10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
    G
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Panthers de la Floride
    1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
    DG
    UFA
    800 000 $800 000 $
    DD
    UFA
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Panthers de la Floride
    800 000 $800 000 $
    DD
    UFA
    Logo de Panthers de la Floride
    775 000 $775 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Panthers de la Floride
    800 000 $800 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    12 mars à 15 h 38
    #1
    Once a Kings Fan Too
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 40,444
    Mentions "j'aime": 25,343
    Anaheim wouldn't give a future fourth-round draft pick for Evan Nause.
    12 mars à 15 h 49
    #2
    Stovetop
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2017
    Messages: 1,977
    Mentions "j'aime": 868
    Take out Shakir, the 1st, and Thompson and Sharks say yes. Lundell is a third liner, this is a complete joke
    DFinn91 et glarson17 a aimé ceci.
    12 mars à 16 h 0
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2021
    Messages: 537
    Mentions "j'aime": 197
    Easy no from the Sharks. I like Lundell but wouldn’t do anything more than a guaranteed late 1st (the Vegas pick is unprotected and you never know what can happen) and a B prospect.
    12 mars à 16 h 18
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2019
    Messages: 2,090
    Mentions "j'aime": 712
    Quoting: AStovetop
    Take out Shakir, the 1st, and Thompson and Sharks say yes. Lundell is a third liner, this is a complete joke

    That’s a joke right? He’d be your best player immediately
    12 mars à 16 h 27
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2021
    Messages: 15,514
    Mentions "j'aime": 11,898
    Nause plays in the coast, good luck getting anything for him
    12 mars à 16 h 59
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2022
    Messages: 702
    Mentions "j'aime": 315
    Quoting: AStovetop
    Take out Shakir, the 1st, and Thompson and Sharks say yes. Lundell is a third liner, this is a complete joke


    3rd liner on the best team… dude is easily a 2C at this point, will be a 1C in 3-5 years.
    12 mars à 17 h 39
    #7
    Stovetop
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2017
    Messages: 1,977
    Mentions "j'aime": 868
    Quoting: Hockey91
    That’s a joke right? He’d be your best player immediately


    Lol stop. Eklund is in his first year on the worst offensive team and has better production. Granlund has been excellent. Lundell's ceiling isn't much higher than what he's at now. He's only regressed since his rookie year getting easy matchups. Shakir has top pairing potential, Thompson was JUST acquired and is a great 2nd pairing potential, 2-way RHD. Add to that an unprotected 1st from a team that's bairly in the playoffs and will have to shed cap like crazy next season.

    Yes obviously I'm joking about just Russell and a 4th for Lundell but that's less absurd than the return proposed here
    12 mars à 17 h 43
    #8
    Stovetop
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2017
    Messages: 1,977
    Mentions "j'aime": 868
    Quoting: Rolfadinho
    3rd liner on the best team… dude is easily a 2C at this point, will be a 1C in 3-5 years.


    He wouldn't be shopped around by so many Panthers fans if he were seen as a 2C. He has that potential but he's only regressed since his rookie year and until he can show he can get back to that level, he's not interesting for an insane return like this
    12 mars à 19 h 16
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2022
    Messages: 702
    Mentions "j'aime": 315
    Quoting: AStovetop
    He wouldn't be shopped around by so many Panthers fans if he were seen as a 2C. He has that potential but he's only regressed since his rookie year and until he can show he can get back to that level, he's not interesting for an insane return like this


    Most of the shopping around is being done by other fan bases who want him badly.
    12 mars à 19 h 23
    #10
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2019
    Messages: 2,090
    Mentions "j'aime": 712
    Quoting: AStovetop
    Lol stop. Eklund is in his first year on the worst offensive team and has better production. Granlund has been excellent. Lundell's ceiling isn't much higher than what he's at now. He's only regressed since his rookie year getting easy matchups. Shakir has top pairing potential, Thompson was JUST acquired and is a great 2nd pairing potential, 2-way RHD. Add to that an unprotected 1st from a team that's bairly in the playoffs and will have to shed cap like crazy next season.

    Yes obviously I'm joking about just Russell and a 4th for Lundell but that's less absurd than the return proposed here

    Yes because eklund is playing on the 90% offensive line starts. Lundell is already a top defensive center playing no pp minutes and all pk minutes while shutting down teams upper 2 lines. Nothing but skakir does anything for Florida here. A first is useless to them and the other two are ahl players so you can keep them. The first and shakir is what it would take to move lundell
    12 mars à 21 h 32
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2021
    Messages: 1,060
    Mentions "j'aime": 527
    absolutely brutal trade
    12 mars à 21 h 34
    #12
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2021
    Messages: 1,060
    Mentions "j'aime": 527
    Quoting: Hockey91
    That’s a joke right? He’d be your best player immediately


    I mean like he'd have more impact on San Jose than he does on Florida but no he wouldn't be our best player lol
    12 mars à 22 h 38
    #13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2019
    Messages: 2,090
    Mentions "j'aime": 712
    Quoting: Letsgosharks
    I mean like he'd have more impact on San Jose than he does on Florida but no he wouldn't be our best player lol


    Then who is. Granlund? I might be your best this season but he’s certainly far from a teams top player and not a player you build a team around. He’d be your best player now. Maybe not down the road when your young guys grow their game but he’d be your barkov type with the right players.
    12 mars à 22 h 43
    #14
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2021
    Messages: 1,060
    Mentions "j'aime": 527
    Quoting: Hockey91
    Then who is. Granlund? I might be your best this season but he’s certainly far from a teams top player and not a player you build a team around. He’d be your best player now. Maybe not down the road when your young guys grow their game but he’d be your barkov type with the right players.


    Yeah probs granny or eklund, I mean I get your point but its not like he would be far and above our best player, maybe given an opportunity on San Jose's top line or something he will perform as our best player, but who knows. I would love to see him on San Jose.
    Hockey91 a aimé ceci.
    12 mars à 23 h 52
    #15
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 8,166
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,648
    All that for Lundell? lol what? How about barkov instead
    13 mars à 11 h 36
    #16
    Stovetop
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2017
    Messages: 1,977
    Mentions "j'aime": 868
    Quoting: Hockey91
    Yes because eklund is playing on the 90% offensive line starts. Lundell is already a top defensive center playing no pp minutes and all pk minutes while shutting down teams upper 2 lines. Nothing but skakir does anything for Florida here. A first is useless to them and the other two are ahl players so you can keep them. The first and shakir is what it would take to move lundell


    How is a first useless to any team. That's legit the dumbest thing I've read. Sharks wouldn't trade Shakir for Lundell one for one.
    13 mars à 12 h 9
    #17
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2019
    Messages: 2,090
    Mentions "j'aime": 712
    Quoting: AStovetop
    How is a first useless to any team. That's legit the dumbest thing I've read. Sharks wouldn't trade Shakir for Lundell one for one.


    Because the panthers are in win now mode. Not trade assets for parts that won’t play for them for 4 years. So yes useless to them.
    13 mars à 12 h 11
    #18
    Stovetop
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2017
    Messages: 1,977
    Mentions "j'aime": 868
    Quoting: Hockey91
    Because the panthers are in win now mode. Not trade assets for parts that won’t play for them for 4 years. So yes useless to them.


    I'm not saying they should trade Lundell, but to say a 1st doesn't have value to them is a completely other thing. That's completely false
    13 mars à 12 h 18
    #19
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2019
    Messages: 2,090
    Mentions "j'aime": 712
    Quoting: AStovetop
    I'm not saying they should trade Lundell, but to say a 1st doesn't have value to them is a completely other thing. That's completely false

    I mean a pick in the 30’s isnt very valuable to a team trying to win a cup. If they trade lundell it’s not for a pick.
    13 mars à 12 h 24
    #20
    Stovetop
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2017
    Messages: 1,977
    Mentions "j'aime": 868
    Quoting: Hockey91
    I mean a pick in the 30’s isnt very valuable to a team trying to win a cup. If they trade lundell it’s not for a pick.


    Vegas is literally barely hanging onto a wilcard spot and they're about 300 mil over the cap. And the Sharks drafted Musty at 26 and he's absolutely nasty
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage