SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Playing around with a Lindholm trade idea

Créé par: AK50
Équipe: 2023-24 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 6 mars 2024
Publié: 6 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
BOS
  1. Johansson, Filip
  2. Lindholm, Elias
  3. Choix de 6e ronde en 2024 (SJS)
Détails additionnels:
Lindholm comes with 7 year extension
Mikheyev is traded elsewhere to clear cap
2.
PHI
  1. Harrison, Brett
  2. Regula, Alec
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (BOS)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (BOS)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de SJS
2025
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2026
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $82 508 334 $4 500 000 $0 $991 666 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
11 250 000 $11 250 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
787 500 $787 500 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 475 000 $3 475 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG
NTC, NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
870 000 $870 000 $ (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
C
RFA - 3
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 mars à 20 h 59
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 980
Mentions "j'aime": 286
Whether or not we agree on this price, I think its pretty clear that the Flyers would want more than that to move Laughton: otherwise, he'd be gone already.
6 mars à 21 h 0
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 10,392
Mentions "j'aime": 2,885
Quoting: bluspy88
Whether or not we agree on this price, I think its pretty clear that the Flyers would want more than that to move Laughton: otherwise, he'd be gone already.


Agreed. I'd have to imagine they'd want at least a 1st rounder for him. If teams / fans think that is unfair or an unreasonable ask, fair enough, but they aren't going to move him for mid round picks.
bluspy88 a aimé ceci.
6 mars à 21 h 2
#3
westleysnipez
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,368
Mentions "j'aime": 586
No interest in Zacha.
6 mars à 21 h 21
#4
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,218
Mentions "j'aime": 7,008
Quoting: westleysnipez
No interest in Zacha.


he's playing a heck of a lot better than lindholm is right now.
6 mars à 21 h 25
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,829
Mentions "j'aime": 8,852
Would not trade Zacha for Elias straight up.
6 mars à 21 h 51
#6
westleysnipez
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,368
Mentions "j'aime": 586
Quoting: Bcarlo25
he's playing a heck of a lot better than lindholm is right now.


No, he isn't.

Zacha has 1 more point in 1 less game while on pace for a career year and Lindholm is having a down year. Lindholm is far better overall; his defensive, penalty-killing, and faceoff skills are some of the best in the league. The only area Lindholm is struggling in right now is offense.
6 mars à 22 h 7
#7
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,218
Mentions "j'aime": 7,008
Quoting: westleysnipez
No, he isn't.

Zacha has 1 more point in 1 less game while on pace for a career year and Lindholm is having a down year. Lindholm is far better overall; his defensive, penalty-killing, and faceoff skills are some of the best in the league. The only area Lindholm is struggling in right now is offense.


notice, i wasn't comparing their careers. zacha is playing better than lindholm.....right now.
7 mars à 11 h 40
#8
westleysnipez
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,368
Mentions "j'aime": 586
Quoting: Bcarlo25
notice, i wasn't comparing their careers. zacha is playing better than lindholm.....right now.


And again, no Zacha is not playing better overall. Slightly better offensively, worse defensively.
7 mars à 11 h 47
#9
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,218
Mentions "j'aime": 7,008
Quoting: westleysnipez
And again, no Zacha is not playing better overall. Slightly better offensively, worse defensively.


this is completely and utter delusional. stop lying to yourself - sensing a pattern here.
7 mars à 12 h 14
#10
westleysnipez
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,368
Mentions "j'aime": 586
Quoting: Bcarlo25
this is completely and utter delusional. stop lying to yourself - sensing a pattern here.


Right, yeah my bad. Zacha's 45% on the faceoff is better than Lindholm's 56%.

Zacha's CF% at 5v5 is 47.5% whereas Lindholm's is 51.5% on Vancouver.

Zacha: https://i.imgur.com/jUzStr9.png

Lindholm: https://i.imgur.com/qpKLNpl.png

But again, I can back up my points with facts and evidence, you can only say "tHaT's nOt TRuE."
7 mars à 12 h 31
#11
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,218
Mentions "j'aime": 7,008
Quoting: westleysnipez
Right, yeah my bad. Zacha's 45% on the faceoff is better than Lindholm's 56%.

Zacha's CF% at 5v5 is 47.5% whereas Lindholm's is 51.5% on Vancouver.

Zacha: https://i.imgur.com/jUzStr9.png

Lindholm: https://i.imgur.com/qpKLNpl.png

But again, I can back up my points with facts and evidence, you can only say "tHaT's nOt TRuE."


lindholm is better at faceoffs. honestly, i don't really care about the fancy stats. they touch on about 2% of the equation. watch a game man. zacha is playing better than lindholm right now.

what did you call it? spongebob text or something? again - it makes you look really stupid. gen Z man, you guys are a hoot.
7 mars à 12 h 34
#12
westleysnipez
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,368
Mentions "j'aime": 586
Quoting: Bcarlo25
lindholm is better at faceoffs. honestly, i don't really care about the fancy stats. they touch on about 2% of the equation. watch a game man. zacha is playing better than lindholm right now.

what did you call it? spongebob text or something? again - it makes you look really stupid. gen Z man, you guys are a hoot.


ok boomer
AK50 a aimé ceci.
7 mars à 12 h 37
#13
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,218
Mentions "j'aime": 7,008
Quoting: westleysnipez
ok boomer


i'm 30, but whatever. so you're clearly still in high school, why didn't you play hockey? fun sport. give it a shot.

edit: scratch that. i don't want to be mean to a kid - have a good one, and have fun when you get to college. it's a blast.
7 mars à 12 h 41
#14
westleysnipez
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,368
Mentions "j'aime": 586
Quoting: Bcarlo25
i'm 30, but whatever. so you're clearly still in high school, why didn't you play hockey? fun sport. give it a shot.


Why don't you try to have a conversation and debate the topic instead of trying to ask what my high school interests are, boomer?
7 mars à 12 h 58
#15
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,218
Mentions "j'aime": 7,008
Quoting: westleysnipez
Why don't you try to have a conversation and debate the topic instead of trying to ask what my high school interests are, boomer?


oh i'm saying i don't think you bring a thing to the table, and i generally don't enjoy conversing with children. best of luck sport.
7 mars à 13 h 46
#16
westleysnipez
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,368
Mentions "j'aime": 586
Quoting: Bcarlo25
oh i'm saying i don't think you bring a thing to the table, and i generally don't enjoy conversing with children. best of luck sport.


Come back when you have data and facts to back up your opinions.
AK50 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage