SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Eye of a he storm

Créé par: Jwirb12
Équipe: 2023-24 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 4 mars 2024
Publié: 4 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2025
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2026
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $78 895 834 $4 500 000 $0 $4 604 166 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
11 250 000 $11 250 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
787 500 $787 500 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 475 000 $3 475 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG
NTC, NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
762 500 $762 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
870 000 $870 000 $ (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
4 mars à 6 h 0
#1
Lets Get Kraken
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 8,643
Mentions "j'aime": 3,472
Canes aren’t moving Necas for a goalie, and DeBrusk is hardly even an upgrade at all over Necas. Canes pass
Jwirb12 a aimé ceci.
4 mars à 6 h 6
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 373
Mentions "j'aime": 49
Quoting: evelutions2
Canes aren’t moving Necas for a goalie, and DeBrusk is hardly even an upgrade at all over Necas. Canes pass


I tend agree just want to see what the capfriedly GMs think. How badly does Carolina need a goalie and does necas camp want more money than Carolina wants to give. Carolina usually has a hard value on guys and rarely budges on that value
4 mars à 6 h 30
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 9,246
Mentions "j'aime": 2,965
Ullmark’s playoff performances aren’t good

No need moving all of this for a pending FA and a 1 year left guy who we wouldn’t keep
4 mars à 6 h 55
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 373
Mentions "j'aime": 49
Quoting: ecupirate07
Ullmark’s playoff performances aren’t good

No need moving all of this for a pending FA and a 1 year left guy who we wouldn’t keep


Chatfield and raanta can’t possible be considered “all of this” right. They are expendable pieces
4 mars à 7 h 10
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 9,246
Mentions "j'aime": 2,965
Quoting: Jwirb12
Chatfield and raanta can’t possible be considered “all of this” right. They are expendable pieces


Raanta is expendable, yes. Chatty is a good cheap part of our top notched D. If he isn’t there, we have to change up our pairings because Orlov isn’t the guy to cover TDA. Chatty has bottom tier top 4 metrics right now. He is playing well

All of that just means the value of the whole package not indicative of each player’s value.
palhal et Jwirb12 a aimé ceci.
4 mars à 8 h 33
#6
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 8,733
Mentions "j'aime": 3,601
Canes pass not close.
4 mars à 8 h 40
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,794
Mentions "j'aime": 8,839
Quoting: evelutions2
Canes aren’t moving Necas for a goalie, and DeBrusk is hardly even an upgrade at all over Necas. Canes pass


1- Necas was on the table for Saros. Canes don’t want to pay his next contract.

2 - who said Debrusk is supposed to be an upgrade for Necas? He’s a replacement for, the upgrade is in goal. Debrusk softens the blow with a a FW that gives somewhat similar production and better defense.

I agree the Canes probably are out of the goalie market with Freddy getting closer. A few weeks ago it might have been different.

Ullmark/Merkulov for Necas/Raanta would have made more sense and more cap neutral.
Jwirb12 a aimé ceci.
4 mars à 9 h 7
#8
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,547
Mentions "j'aime": 22,689
Kotchetkov???? is playing well for the Canes, gee maybe even better than Ullmark. Especially if Andersson might be returning, no need for Ullmark.
What's the nonsense, that Necas might want more $$$$ than the Canes want to pay? He's an RFA.
4 mars à 9 h 8
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,537
Mentions "j'aime": 5,032
Canes pass easy. Not giving up Necas for Ullmark, you want Necas for a goalie, it's gotta be Swayman.
4 mars à 9 h 32
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 9,246
Mentions "j'aime": 2,965
Quoting: Gofnut999
1- Necas was on the table for Saros. Canes don’t want to pay his next contract.

2 - who said Debrusk is supposed to be an upgrade for Necas? He’s a replacement for, the upgrade is in goal. Debrusk softens the blow with a a FW that gives somewhat similar production and better defense.

I agree the Canes probably are out of the goalie market with Freddy getting closer. A few weeks ago it might have been different.

Ullmark/Merkulov for Necas/Raanta would have made more sense and more cap neutral.


Necas was never on the table for saros. Friedman literally said he just came up with a name out of the air that may interest Nashville
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage