SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

A classy TDL

Créé par: NucksnOilers
Équipe: 2023-24 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 1 mars 2024
Publié: 1 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This team has 3 needs as of now

- Top-4 RD
-Middle 6 winger
-Tandem 1B goalie

For my sanity please ignore the 29 thousand. If it becomes a picky thing then I'd just add Janmark to one of these deals and bring up Kemp to be an extra
Transactions
1.
EDM
  1. Carrier, Alexandre (1 250 000 $ retained)
NSH
  1. Broberg, Philip
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
Even if Nashville is still trying to contend (for whatever reason) I still think they move Carrier for the right price
2.
SJS
  1. Ceci, Cody
  2. Lavoie, Raphael
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2026 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
The sharks d-core is probably the worst I've ever seen right now, they make a solid suitor to take on Ceci for the next year to help guide this tank. I also think Ceci would be pretty happy to upgrade from Edmonton winters to San Fran summers lmao.
3.
EDM
  1. Vatrano, Frank
Détails additionnels:
This feels like an overpay and well it kinda is but that's ok.
ANA
  1. Akey, Beau
  2. Foegele, Warren
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
I don't think the Ducks and Oilers relationship is so intense that the Ducks are gonna refuse to work with them. This feels like a solid package for a guy whose value will never be higher than right now.
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de NSH
2025
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2026
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2183 500 000 $83 529 167 $850 000 $4 200 000 $-29 167 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 650 000 $3 650 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance650 000 $$650K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
775 000 $775 000 $ (Bonis de performance325 000 $$325K)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
775 000 $775 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 225 000 $$3M)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Predators de Nashville
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
762 500 $762 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
762 500 $762 500 $
G
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
1 mars à 16 h 6
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,773
Mentions "j'aime": 1,807
Ducks decline imo. We can reasonably get around a 1st for him next TDL. Akey is not a very enticing prospect. Not enough imo to consider moving him in division with another year left on his deal
LosPatos, OldNYIfan et GeneralLandro a aimé ceci.
1 mars à 16 h 11
#2
Démarrer sujet
Save Mcdavid
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 2,898
Mentions "j'aime": 1,253
Quoting: Jded
Ducks decline imo. We can reasonably get around a 1st for him next TDL. Akey is not a very enticing prospect. Not enough imo to consider moving him in division with another year left on his deal


I would say you're kind underselling Akey right now, a puck-moving d-man whose only struggle seems to be staying healthy. He also plays the right side which the ducks seem to need more than anything. This package is the equivalent of 2 1sts imo, I don't think Vatrano will ever reach those heights again especially if he's being moved as a rental
1 mars à 16 h 16
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 358
Mentions "j'aime": 89
San Jose should jump on that deal. Would be curious to see how Kahkonen coukd do with better team in front of him

I bet you could even get 50% retention included on Kahkonen
NucksnOilers a aimé ceci.
1 mars à 16 h 20
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,773
Mentions "j'aime": 1,807
Quoting: NucksnOilers
I would say you're kind underselling Akey right now, a puck-moving d-man whose only struggle seems to be staying healthy. He also plays the right side which the ducks seem to need more than anything. This package is the equivalent of 2 1sts imo, I don't think Vatrano will ever reach those heights again especially if he's being moved as a rental


A player taken 56th overall is barely a 2nd rounder. If he follows up in his D+1 year by playing a whopping 14 games, he does not advance a full round. This is more like a late 1st and a late 3rd at the very best

RD is a need, but moreso a #1RD caliber prospect (we have Luneau, Warren, and Helleson). I certainly prefer the first 2 to him currently, and possibly Helleson as well

As I said, Vatrano would likely fetch a return so eerily similar to this a year from now with retention that I just don’t see it as remotely enticing for a trade now, especially in division
OldNYIfan et GeneralLandro a aimé ceci.
1 mars à 16 h 21
#5
Démarrer sujet
Save Mcdavid
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 2,898
Mentions "j'aime": 1,253
Quoting: jakdonaghy
San Jose should jump on that deal. Would be curious to see how Kahkonen coukd do with better team in front of him

I bet you could even get 50% retention included on Kahkonen


Yeah the only thing is they only have one retention spot left and they'll probably use that on Duclair
1 mars à 16 h 43
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 1,113
Mentions "j'aime": 555
Sharks accept, good post btw
jakdonaghy a aimé ceci.
1 mars à 16 h 44
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,609
Mentions "j'aime": 11,995
Quoting: Jded
Ducks decline imo. We can reasonably get around a 1st for him next TDL. Akey is not a very enticing prospect. Not enough imo to consider moving him in division with another year left on his deal


This
1 mars à 17 h 4
#8
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,599
Mentions "j'aime": 25,452
23 games of UFA Warren Foegele is of virtually no use to the Ducks, because I don't think that he's a good candidate for re-signing, so this trade is basically our leading scorer for Akey and a pick that's likely to be number 23 or later. From Anaheim's perspective, that's not an overpay, it's an underpay.
1 mars à 23 h 53
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 358
Mentions "j'aime": 89
Quoting: NucksnOilers
Yeah the only thing is they only have one retention spot left and they'll probably use that on Duclair


Good point. Sharks should pay a 3rd team with their own pick to facilitate the trade if that's the case. Cost could only be a 5th or so. Figure that Ceci could net that or much better at next trade deadline with the added benefit of him helping stabilize the blueline a bit next year
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage