SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Deadline Continuation

Créé par: TMLBRIAN
Équipe: 2023-24 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 29 févr. 2024
Publié: 29 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Am I tripping?

Thoughts?
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Lindgren, Ryan
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (NYR)
NYR
  1. Hanifin, Noah (2 475 000 $ retained)
2.
CGY
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (BOS)
Détails additionnels:
top 10 protected
BOS
  1. Kuzmenko, Andrei (2 750 000 $ retained)
3.
CGY
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2024 (SEA)
4.
CGY
  1. Casey, Seamus [Liste de réserve]
  2. Vanecek, Vitek
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (NJD)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de NYR
Logo de CGY
Logo de DAL
Logo de CGY
Logo de NJD
Logo de CGY
Logo de NJD
Logo de CHI
Logo de SEA
Logo de CGY
2025
Logo de FLA
Logo de BOS
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2026
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2183 500 000 $73 889 166 $0 $212 500 $9 610 834 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
825 000 $825 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
775 000 $775 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
29 févr. à 5 h 46
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,542
Mentions "j'aime": 19,683
There's like a less than zero percent chance Lindgren would sign an extension with Calgary so I can't see any way the Flames would target him. Rangers fans seem more inclined to move Miller though since he's struggled a lot this year. If that's the case I would gladly take him instead.

I have a hard time seeing Boston do that but maybe

Devils fans will tell you Markstrom is only worth a 2nd
TMLBRIAN a aimé ceci.
29 févr. à 5 h 48
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,532
Mentions "j'aime": 4,174
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
There's like a less than zero percent chance Lindgren would sign an extension with Calgary so I can't see any way the Flames would target him. Rangers fans seem more inclined to move Miller though since he's struggled a lot this year. If that's the case I would gladly take him instead.

I have a hard time seeing Boston do that but maybe

Devils fans will tell you Markstrom is only worth a 2nd


Fair - I actually agree with Devils fans on that one. Time will tell though.
29 févr. à 5 h 49
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,532
Mentions "j'aime": 4,174
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
There's like a less than zero percent chance Lindgren would sign an extension with Calgary so I can't see any way the Flames would target him. Rangers fans seem more inclined to move Miller though since he's struggled a lot this year. If that's the case I would gladly take him instead.

I have a hard time seeing Boston do that but maybe

Devils fans will tell you Markstrom is only worth a 2nd


I just changed the 1st to a 3rd. Casey is a big piece. Thoughts from your perspective?
29 févr. à 5 h 53
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,542
Mentions "j'aime": 19,683
Quoting: TMLBRIAN
I just changed the 1st to a 3rd. Casey is a big piece. Thoughts from your perspective?


I was kidding on the Devils one. Casey is solid but he's not worth that much, especially if Calgary is taking on VV. The original trade was probably much closer to fair but probably add retention to Markstrom (1.5-2M)
29 févr. à 5 h 57
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,532
Mentions "j'aime": 4,174
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
I was kidding on the Devils one. Casey is solid but he's not worth that much, especially if Calgary is taking on VV. The original trade was probably much closer to fair but probably add retention to Markstrom (1.5-2M)


Goalies rarely go for much. Casey seems like a perfect add for Calgary. Seems like their RD prospect pool is low. But their LD pool is heavy. Time will tell if Markstrom gets moved!

BIG UFA ADD - Andersson
Lindgren-Weegar
New Defensive Kid from Dallas - Casey

Could be a fun long term 6 man!
29 févr. à 6 h 17
#6
Knuckle Danz
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 311
Mentions "j'aime": 88
Honestly, the idea of moving Miller to a forward spot has been kicked around; the idea puts onus on a Lindgren re-signing. Other trades are making the Rangers take a wait-and-see approach.

Hanafin has been tied to the Rangers for months, for both short and long-term possibilities. A deal retaining salary and sending a player in return, doesn't look as necessary, if placing Miller up front takes place.

But, hey, enjoy the fantasy.
TMLBRIAN a aimé ceci.
29 févr. à 6 h 40
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,542
Mentions "j'aime": 19,683
Quoting: TMLBRIAN
Goalies rarely go for much. Casey seems like a perfect add for Calgary. Seems like their RD prospect pool is low. But their LD pool is heavy. Time will tell if Markstrom gets moved!

BIG UFA ADD - Andersson
Lindgren-Weegar
New Defensive Kid from Dallas - Casey

Could be a fun long term 6 man!


Goalies are rarely ever traded in general. Especially one that will be top 5 in Vezina voting and also has term. the 2 closest examples in any recent time are Vokoun and R. Miller

Casey is a weird fit. RD wise Calgary has Weegar and Andersson (probably going to be extended and likely named captain) for the foreseeable future. Then they just acquired Brzustewicz, who is a similar caliber prospect and about a year younger than Casey. The question is whether Calgary needs another offensive defenseman, which is probably not. Odds are Kylington is staying, he has been pretty outspoken about where his loyalty lies and how he owes it to Calgary. On top of that Calgary also has Poirier who was looking like an absolute stud at the start of the year, but we'll see how he is once he starts playing again. Then we also have Morin, who is having another solid offensive year in the AHL. I'm not saying Calgary wouldn't be interested in Casey, just that he's not a perfect fit outside of the way he holds his stick.

Again I think the chances that Lindgren would sign in Calgary are less than zero percent. If Hanifin isn't willing to extend, why would he?
29 févr. à 6 h 47
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,532
Mentions "j'aime": 4,174
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Goalies are rarely ever traded in general. Especially one that will be top 5 in Vezina voting and also has term. the 2 closest examples in any recent time are Vokoun and R. Miller

Casey is a weird fit. RD wise Calgary has Weegar and Andersson (probably going to be extended and likely named captain) for the foreseeable future. Then they just acquired Brzustewicz, who is a similar caliber prospect and about a year younger than Casey. The question is whether Calgary needs another offensive defenseman, which is probably not. Odds are Kylington is staying, he has been pretty outspoken about where his loyalty lies and how he owes it to Calgary. On top of that Calgary also has Poirier who was looking like an absolute stud at the start of the year, but we'll see how he is once he starts playing again. Then we also have Morin, who is having another solid offensive year in the AHL. I'm not saying Calgary wouldn't be interested in Casey, just that he's not a perfect fit outside of the way he holds his stick.

Again I think the chances that Lindgren would sign in Calgary are less than zero percent. If Hanifin isn't willing to extend, why would he?


Oh right!! I forgot they got Brzustewicz. What a stellar add by Conroy. You guys won that Vancouver trade HARD.

Why do you think Lindgren wouldn't sign? He is an RFA.
29 févr. à 7 h 33
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,542
Mentions "j'aime": 19,683
Quoting: TMLBRIAN
Oh right!! I forgot they got Brzustewicz. What a stellar add by Conroy. You guys won that Vancouver trade HARD.

Why do you think Lindgren wouldn't sign? He is an RFA.


Same as Hanifin. US born player in his prime. Not looking for a rebuilding team
29 févr. à 7 h 39
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,440
Mentions "j'aime": 18,437
Since Fitzy offered Holtz for Markstrom, and Conroy accepted with "some" retention.

Than if there is no retention on Markstrom, the return is expected to be...less than Holtz.

Devils are the only buyer...
Calgary can just hang onto him and sell him over summer or at next deadline (albeit for less)

I think Fitzy is holding out for Hanifin+Markstrom package


Something like...
NJD: Holtz, Bahl, protected 1st (like LAK 2023), mid-pick
CGY: Hanifin, Markstrom (50%)
29 févr. à 8 h 1
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,731
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
You're right to target Lindgren since it wouldn't be wise for the Rangers to extend him.

You're wrong to try to send back a rental for him. It'd be for someone with team control and a comparable cap or for a mid 1st.
Fox_Czar_Cup a aimé ceci.
29 févr. à 9 h 20
#12
Soggy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 502
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Rangers need a forward much more than they need a D. Decline
29 févr. à 9 h 46
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,838
Mentions "j'aime": 908
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
There's like a less than zero percent chance Lindgren would sign an extension with Calgary so I can't see any way the Flames would target him. Rangers fans seem more inclined to move Miller though since he's struggled a lot this year. If that's the case I would gladly take him instead.

I have a hard time seeing Boston do that but maybe

Devils fans will tell you Markstrom is only worth a 2nd


These Rangers fans who want to move Miller actually know very little about hockey so I would take what they say with a grain of salt. Rangers brass would surely move Lindgren before Miller because the type of game Lindgren plays tends to break down the body at a quicker rate. If the Rangers do decide to move Lindgren though, it would probably look like something along the lines of the Brady Skjei return (back half of round 1 draft pick) or a forward of a similar age. Miller has been arguably the Rangers best defenseman since the all star break.

Agree with everything else you said.
Fox_Czar_Cup a aimé ceci.
29 févr. à 11 h 10
#14
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 11,996
Mentions "j'aime": 3,176
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Goalies are rarely ever traded in general. Especially one that will be top 5 in Vezina voting and also has term. the 2 closest examples in any recent time are Vokoun and R. Miller

Casey is a weird fit. RD wise Calgary has Weegar and Andersson (probably going to be extended and likely named captain) for the foreseeable future. Then they just acquired Brzustewicz, who is a similar caliber prospect and about a year younger than Casey. The question is whether Calgary needs another offensive defenseman, which is probably not. Odds are Kylington is staying, he has been pretty outspoken about where his loyalty lies and how he owes it to Calgary. On top of that Calgary also has Poirier who was looking like an absolute stud at the start of the year, but we'll see how he is once he starts playing again. Then we also have Morin, who is having another solid offensive year in the AHL. I'm not saying Calgary wouldn't be interested in Casey, just that he's not a perfect fit outside of the way he holds his stick.

Again I think the chances that Lindgren would sign in Calgary are less than zero percent. If Hanifin isn't willing to extend, why would he?


I know of a guy who was coming off a top 5 Vezina season (and a top 10 finish the year before) at age 30 with a contract of 6 million dollars with term who was acquired without paying a single draft asset
29 févr. à 11 h 28
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,609
Mentions "j'aime": 4,584
Avs decline.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage