SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Playoff roster

Créé par: SlimTJ100
Équipe: 2023-24 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 14 févr. 2024
Publié: 25 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I’d trade Miller before this years TDL. He’s killing them. Trouba hasn’t helped but I think if he had a better partner his game would improve

Only way I trade all of this for Hanafin is if he re-signs. 8 years probably, 8-9 AAV (ball park)
Transactions
1.
NYR
  1. Bjugstad, Nick
  2. Välimäki, Juuso
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (NYR)
2.
NYR
  1. Hanifin, Noah (2 475 000 $ retained)
CGY
  1. Berard, Brett
  2. Jones, Zachary
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (NYR)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (NYR)
  5. Choix de 4e ronde en 2026 (NYR)
Détails additionnels:
Conditional second
*becomes a 1st w/ECF appearance

- Hanafin extends with NYR
3.
NYR
  1. Tarasenko, Vladimir (900 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Banking on Rangers having leverage where Tarasenko only approves a trade to NY
OTT
  1. Robertson, Matthew
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (NYR)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (DAL)
Détails additionnels:
Prospect could be negotiated
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2025
Logo de NYR
Logo de MIN
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2026
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $77 207 083 $610 892 $582 500 $6 292 917 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 325 000 $2 325 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
828 333 $828 333 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
846 667 $846 667 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
762 500 $762 500 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
-1 237 500 $-1 237 500 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
825 000 $825 000 $ (Bonis de performance100 000 $$100K)
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 666 667 $5 666 667 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Rangers de New York
825 000 $825 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 437 500 $4 437 500 $
C, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 641 667 $3 641 667 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
800 000 $800 000 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
820 000 $820 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
25 févr. à 23 h 16
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,564
Mentions "j'aime": 3,279
I would change that condition to Rangers winning the cup in 2024 or 2025 personally.
25 févr. à 23 h 19
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 916
Mentions "j'aime": 525
Has Miller been really that bad? A change of scenery might help it seems. Doubt Arizona buys, but I would accept that as Arizona

Also I feel like Calgary would be interested in Miller, so why not use him as one of the main pieces in a Hanafin move?
25 févr. à 23 h 22
#3
Démarrer sujet
Milolaborino
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,128
Mentions "j'aime": 317
Quoting: FoxYou727
Has Miller been really that bad? A change of scenery might help it seems. Doubt Arizona buys, but I would accept that as Arizona

Also I feel like Calgary would be interested in Miller, so why not use him as one of the main pieces in a Hanafin move?
miller has really struggled this year

It’s a fair point where he’d go to Calgary in the trade. I like the Arizona guys and thought they needed some salary on their cap so that’s why I sent him there
FoxYou727 a aimé ceci.
25 févr. à 23 h 28
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 916
Mentions "j'aime": 525
Quoting: SlimTJ100
miller has really struggled this year

It’s a fair point where he’d go to Calgary in the trade. I like the Arizona guys and thought they needed some salary on their cap so that’s why I sent him there


I see. But anyways if I am Calgary I try to aim for a package of Miller + 1st. I like Miller so I feel trading him right now would be a mistake. More of an offseason move
Ledge_And_Dairy a aimé ceci.
25 févr. à 23 h 30
#5
Démarrer sujet
Milolaborino
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,128
Mentions "j'aime": 317
Quoting: FoxYou727
I see. But anyways if I am Calgary I try to aim for a package of Miller + 1st. I like Miller so I feel trading him right now would be a mistake. More of an offseason move

I know the potential he has and he’s shown it many times, but he’s very inconsistent and this years he’s had some regression. They wouldn’t trade him for peanuts and would have to get a defenseman in return for him
25 févr. à 23 h 38
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 916
Mentions "j'aime": 525
Quoting: SlimTJ100
I know the potential he has and he’s shown it many times, but he’s very inconsistent and this years he’s had some regression. They wouldn’t trade him for peanuts and would have to get a defenseman in return for him


Agreed. But at the same time I feel like Rangers can get more. I mean if Romanov and Nilks get firsts. And Chariot and Savard got firsts. so could the rangers should be able to get a first I feel

still if i am Calgary Miller is def someone I ask for
Ledge_And_Dairy a aimé ceci.
25 févr. à 23 h 48
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 2,844
Mentions "j'aime": 834
Im AZ id love to get miller - dont see bjug as guy AZ willing to give - he is only C over 23 yo they have, I think NYR be better w zucker (50%) replace vesey (zucker still an score but he is playing with grinders in AZ). Bjug has good pt total because is between maccelli and crouse. not sure valimaki improvement over guf either. would NYR want more picks (that board is lean) for miller.
26 févr. à 0 h 47
#8
Novistic
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 790
Mentions "j'aime": 375
Take Bjugstad out and Arizona accepts.
If you want a center from us, then you can trade for McBain while you still have the chance because his recent play is going to soon convince Armstrong to not have him on the table
26 févr. à 1 h 22
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 417
Mentions "j'aime": 191
I think you'd regret selling low on Miller
26 févr. à 2 h 23
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 768
Mentions "j'aime": 502
I'm in from AZ's point of view. I think they want to keep Bjugstad, but getting Miller back makes too much sense long-term. 24 year old defenseman who is big, skates, and can eat minutes. It's a no-brainer to me.

I like Bjugstad a lot. He's been a big influence in the room. Valimaki has shown flashes of why he was a highly regarded prospect, but he has never played at Miller's level. They have 10 2nd rounders the next three years. It's fine.

They slid McBain up between Maccelli and Crouse after the deadline last year, and the line didn't miss a beat. Cooley, Hayton, McBain, Kerfoot is fine. Smith and Jenik in Tucson who need evaluation time at this level or kick them loose. Geekie pushing for a spot next year. They can always grab a free agent veteran center in the off-season if guys aren't ready. Twenty-something games this year without Bjugstad isn't going to kill them. Easier to fill that hole than grab a 6'5" 24 year old who eats big minutes.
26 févr. à 6 h 45
#11
Démarrer sujet
Milolaborino
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,128
Mentions "j'aime": 317
Quoting: Novistic
Take Bjugstad out and Arizona accepts.
If you want a center from us, then you can trade for McBain while you still have the chance because his recent play is going to soon convince Armstrong to not have him on the table


Absolutely not. Nick needs to be in this deal
26 févr. à 16 h 19
#12
Novistic
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 790
Mentions "j'aime": 375
Quoting: SlimTJ100
Absolutely not. Nick needs to be in this deal


then arizona declines lmfao
there's also no real purpose in trading for miller if lamoureux will be NHL ready soon
26 févr. à 17 h 18
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 768
Mentions "j'aime": 502
Quoting: Novistic
then arizona declines lmfao
there's also no real purpose in trading for miller if lamoureux will be NHL ready soon


That's crazy talk.
26 févr. à 18 h 15
#14
Novistic
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 790
Mentions "j'aime": 375
Quoting: Pompadour_de_Armstrong
That's crazy talk.


it's really not, lamoureux is bigger and younger than miller is. he's shown to be a defensive defenceman, which the coyotes need. there's no "crazy talk" about it, there's simply not a purpose in trading for him
26 févr. à 18 h 18
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 768
Mentions "j'aime": 502
Quoting: Novistic
it's really not, lamoureux is bigger and younger than miller is. he's shown to be a defensive defenceman, which the coyotes need. there's no "crazy talk" about it, there's simply not a purpose in trading for him


He's two to three years away from making an impact and you're assuming he hits his potential. Kind of inane to think you don't need a 24 year old with almost 300 games to his credit because you have a guy in the system way down the road.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage