SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

whos going to win a cup first MTL or the Ducks

Créé par: batman
Équipe: 2024-25 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 25 févr. 2024
Publié: 25 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This team is crazy
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3900 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 400 000 $
21 400 000 $
21 400 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Celebrini, Macklin
3950 000 $
Transactions
1.
MTL
  1. Kaliyev, Arthur [Droits de RFA]
2.
MTL
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2026 (WSH)
3.
ANA
  1. Barron, Justin
  2. Evans, Jake
  3. Kidney, Riley
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (WPG)
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (CGY)
Détails additionnels:
Not offering more. When was the last time a GM paid 2 firsts ++? The Calgary 1st rounder could Pay off very well with the Conditions on it ( Monahan trade )
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de MTL
Logo de COL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MIN
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de SJS
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de EDM
Logo de WSH
2025
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de PIT
Logo de MTL
Logo de VAN
Logo de MTL
Logo de DET
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2026
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de WSH
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2187 500 000 $73 776 250 $1 022 500 $3 977 500 $13 723 750 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Celebrini, Macklin
950 000 $950 000 $
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 7
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
835 000 $835 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 362 500 $3 362 500 $
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
AD, AG
RFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
875 000 $875 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
867 500 $867 500 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance420 000 $$420K)
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
890 000 $890 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DG/DD
RFA
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
25 févr. à 21 h 24
#1
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 9,873
Mentions "j'aime": 6,661
"not offering more" cool, then not getting Zegras, that simple.

And to answer your question, MTL since we're apparently gifting you Zegras here.
GeneralLandro et Jded a aimé ceci.
25 févr. à 21 h 36
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,642
Mentions "j'aime": 1,665
ANA declines. See basically every MTL ACGM of the past 2 months for feedback
25 févr. à 22 h 7
#3
Démarrer sujet
fromtherivertothesea
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 2,866
Mentions "j'aime": 798
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
"not offering more" cool, then not getting Zegras, that simple.

And to answer your question, MTL since we're apparently gifting you Zegras here.


y’all are delusional thinking a someone is going to offer 3 first rounders or something equivalent. he can’t even defend. useless without the puck. talent is crazy tho. just not the player you pay that price for.

even without zegras, we are more cup ready than y’all.
25 févr. à 22 h 8
#4
Démarrer sujet
fromtherivertothesea
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 2,866
Mentions "j'aime": 798
Quoting: Jded
ANA declines. See basically every MTL ACGM of the past 2 months for feedback


what do you want. 2024 MTL first Reinbacher Slafkovsky and Hutson are out of talk.
25 févr. à 22 h 23
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,642
Mentions "j'aime": 1,665
Quoting: batman
what do you want. 2024 MTL first Reinbacher Slafkovsky and Hutson are out of talk.


Then absolutely nothing. Quantity does not equal quality. ANA needs top 6 scoring wingers and #1RD. No amount of late 1sts or Barrons will fill those holes. But moving out Zegras opens up another hole in an area they need even when he’s healthy

If we countered with 2 late firsts and Perreault for Caufield, you taking it?
GiggywithGibby a aimé ceci.
25 févr. à 22 h 35
#6
Démarrer sujet
fromtherivertothesea
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 2,866
Mentions "j'aime": 798
Quoting: Jded
Then absolutely nothing. Quantity does not equal quality. ANA needs top 6 scoring wingers and #1RD. No amount of late 1sts or Barrons will fill those holes. But moving out Zegras opens up another hole in an area they need even when he’s healthy

If we countered with 2 late firsts and Perreault for Caufield, you taking it?


It’s different here. We don’t have McTavish Terry Gauthier or Leo Carlsson. Caufield is just a goal scorer and a shifty talented player. He can’t defend just like Zegras. Value wise, the offer you made for Caufield is fair for someone who’s invisible without the puck. but we wouldn’t take it because we’re weak upfront. Slafkovsky is the only rookie young elite forward we have. When was last time a GM traded 2 firsts ++? He certainly won’t pay that price for someone who’s useless without the puck and can’t do anything else than score. You pay that price for players like Pettersson, not Zegras..

If you want a Potential # 1RD, we have Mailloux who’s KILLING it in his first AHL year.
habsfan00 a aimé ceci.
25 févr. à 22 h 54
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,642
Mentions "j'aime": 1,665
Quoting: batman
It’s different here. We don’t have McTavish Terry Gauthier or Leo Carlsson. Caufield is just a goal scorer and a shifty talented player. He can’t defend just like Zegras. Value wise, the offer you made for Caufield is fair for someone who’s invisible without the puck. but we wouldn’t take it because we’re weak upfront. Slafkovsky is the only rookie young elite forward we have. When was last time a GM traded 2 firsts ++? He certainly won’t pay that price for someone who’s useless without the puck and can’t do anything else than score. You pay that price for players like Pettersson, not Zegras..

If you want a Potential # 1RD, we have Mailloux who’s KILLING it in his first AHL year.


He’s 22 years old. How many 22 year olds are defensive studs? And he showed great improvement YoY defensively under Cronin in his limited sample this season. If you don’t like his defensive game, don’t trade for him

I kinda couldn’t care less how often a team trades multiple 1sts. They have a low hit rate of becoming NHL regulars let alone cemented top 6 60 point scorers at 20 years old. ANA has plenty of bottom 6 and bottom 4 prospects. They have no need for more. They need elite talent.. like.. Zegras

And the awesome thing is, ANA has zero need to move him. He’s on a solid contract, RFA controlled, the team and staff love him, and he fills a need short and long-term. The rumors of him being shopped were shutdown by Lebrun already. If you want him, you have to blow ANA away with an offer. This isn’t it

Mailloux would be great (not considering character issues). Pair him with the MTL ‘24 first, and if Lindstrom or Levshunov are up for grabs at MTL’s pick, that’d absolutely be considered by Verbeek
GiggywithGibby a aimé ceci.
26 févr. à 0 h 44
#8
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 9,873
Mentions "j'aime": 6,661
Modifié 26 févr. à 0 h 52
Quoting: batman
what do you want. 2024 MTL first Reinbacher Slafkovsky and Hutson are out of talk.


Then Zegras is out of the talk, get that through your think skull already. If those assets are off the table, there's no conversation to be had, it's not a matter of how many late 1sts and B prospects you can throw at the problem, any trade would have to revolve around a singular blue chip piece.

We turn it down for the same reason you turn down a hypothetical Caufield trade, because we need more elite talent up front, and we have a plethora of the middle 6 pieces you get with late 1st and 2nd round picks.

And if he's "not that good" stop making ACGMs acquiring him.
26 févr. à 8 h 36
#9
Démarrer sujet
fromtherivertothesea
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 2,866
Mentions "j'aime": 798
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Then Zegras is out of the talk, get that through your think skull already. If those assets are off the table, there's no conversation to be had, it's not a matter of how many late 1sts and B prospects you can throw at the problem, any trade would have to revolve around a singular blue chip piece.

We turn it down for the same reason you turn down a hypothetical Caufield trade, because we need more elite talent up front, and we have a plethora of the middle 6 pieces you get with late 1st and 2nd round picks.

And if he's "not that good" stop making ACGMs acquiring him.


" we need elite talent upfront " while having carlsson mctavish zegras gauthier terry.. im not saying he's bad, just exposing his game off the puck. and it's the truth, if he doesn't have the puck on his stick, he brings nothing on the ice. Doesn't go in the corners, not implicated defensively, doesn't hit. Is this the type of player you pay that price for?

Comeback in June and tell me why Eiserman fell of so hard. Maybe you will understand.
habsfan00 a aimé ceci.
26 févr. à 9 h 30
#10
Craig Laughlin Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 5,296
Mentions "j'aime": 5,742
Don't see Washington as a destination for Kovacevic, as the Caps have too many defensemen already in the system and he wouldn't be able to get playing time in DC. 3rd round pick, to me, is a reasonable price for Kovacevic that a contender would likely pay, just not a fit for Washington.
habsfan00 et batman a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage