Éditer l'avatar
  • png, jpeg
  • La grandeur minimale recommandée se veut de 800px par 800px
  • Grandeur maximale: 1MB
Glisser l'image pour repositionner
Sauvegarder
Annuler

habsfan00

Membre depuis
3 jui 2020
Équipe favorite
Canadiens de Montréal
Deuxième équipe favorite
Jets de Winnipeg
Localisation
Toronto
Messages dans les forums
2705
Messages par jour
8.73
Sujets de discussion
569
Forum: Armchair-GMThu at 9:19 pm
Sujet: Eriksson to new jersey
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>The_Rocket</b></div><div>Okay I could see jurmo being a good option instead of Gadjovich. LD is a strong point for the organization anyways.



This is such a tired talking point. Eriksson and Marleau are not comparable. Marleau had a full no love clause and only agreed to be traded if the team aquiring him would buy him out. His buyout cap hit was 6.25 million. That means he can’t be buried, can’t be played, can’t be healthy scratch. Carolina had to take on the full weight of his contract and didn’t even get a roster player for doing so. On top of that, Toronto had 0 leverage. They HAD to trade him in order to sign their RFA’s, there was no other option.

Vancouver doesn’t not have to trad Eriksson, if the price is too high they can hold him. As well, his cap hit is much lower, if he is buried its only 4.875 million, or bought out its only 4 million. Way less than the 6.25 million cap hit for marleau’s buy out. Eriksson also only has a 15 team no trade list, so he can’t be as choosy as Marleau about where to go.

If Marleau costs a 1st to dump, than Eriksson definitely costs less than a 1st, a lot less. And if a team isn’t willing to take it, then the Canucks will just bury him in the minors for one more year. Not a big deal</div></div>

and ur wrong, more delusion from nucks fans
Forum: Armchair-GMThu at 1:45 pm