SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

hey hey ho ho Cal Ritchie will not go

Créé par: JosephSakic
Équipe: 2023-24 Avalanche du Colorado
Date de création initiale: 23 févr. 2024
Publié: 23 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
COL
  1. Henrique, Adam (2 912 500 $ retained)
ANA
  1. Behrens, Sean [Liste de réserve]
  2. Foudy, Jean-Luc
  3. Johansen, Ryan
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (COL)
  5. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (COL)
2.
COL
  1. Allen, Jake (1 925 000 $ retained)
MTL
  1. Prosvetov, Ivan
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (COL)
3.
COL
  1. Girgensons, Zemgus (1 250 000 $ retained)
  2. Johnson, Erik (1 625 000 $ retained)
BUF
  1. MacDermid, Kurtis
  2. Meyers, Ben
  3. Choix de 7e ronde en 2024 (COL)
  4. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (COL)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de SEA
Logo de COL
2025
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
2026
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $76 852 500 $637 500 $0 $6 647 500 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
12 600 000 $12 600 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
AD, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
825 000 $825 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
-1 456 250 $-1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
896 250 $896 250 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
825 000 $825 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
0 $0 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 625 000 $1 625 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
775 000 $775 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
825 000 $825 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 févr. à 17 h 23
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 5,832
Mentions "j'aime": 3,816
Sabres could do something like this imo
We don’t really have use for the players though,
we’d probably just want better picks
sabres89 et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
23 févr. à 17 h 25
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,888
Mentions "j'aime": 4,745
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
Sabres could do something like this imo
We don’t really have use for the players though,
we’d probably just want better picks


Problem is contracts have to go out for contracts to come in. Something a lot of people forget (not suggesting you have, just that it gets forgotten) is the contract limit.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
23 févr. à 17 h 27
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,888
Mentions "j'aime": 4,745
First trade is an overpay by the Avs so gets declined. Second trade is an overpay by the Avs and the Avs can't realistically afford Allen going forward even at 50% retention and the third trade is kinda 'meh'. Can see the Avs bringing back EJ, kind of move they might make but that's about it.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
23 févr. à 17 h 28
#4
Démarrer sujet
SakicMacFarland CO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 117
Mentions "j'aime": 43
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
Sabres could do something like this imo
We don’t really have use for the players though,
we’d probably just want better picks

need to get two contracts out and I'm pretty sure EJ will only play for buffalo and Colorado
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
23 févr. à 17 h 28
#5
Démarrer sujet
SakicMacFarland CO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 117
Mentions "j'aime": 43
Quoting: TJTwolf
First trade is an overpay by the Avs so gets declined. Second trade is an overpay by the Avs and the Avs can't realistically afford Allen going forward even at 50% retention and the third trade is kinda 'meh'. Can see the Avs bringing back EJ, kind of move they might make but that's about it.


its just a similar trade to what I saw sports net mocked up
TJTwolf et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
23 févr. à 17 h 30
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 5,832
Mentions "j'aime": 3,816
Quoting: TJTwolf
Problem is contracts have to go out for contracts to come in. Something a lot of people forget (not suggesting you have, just that it gets forgotten) is the contract limit.


Sure
But if YOU “need” us to take contracts, it’s not gonna count towards any “value” in the trade
We’d just assume take expiring contracts from u guys & get better draft picks
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
23 févr. à 17 h 31
#7
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 5,832
Mentions "j'aime": 3,816
Quoting: JosephSakic
need to get two contracts out and I'm pretty sure EJ will only play for buffalo and Colorado


See above
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
23 févr. à 17 h 37
#8
Démarrer sujet
SakicMacFarland CO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 117
Mentions "j'aime": 43
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
Sure
But if YOU “need” us to take contracts, it’s not gonna count towards any “value” in the trade
We’d just assume take expiring contracts from u guys & get better draft picks


basically all the package including picks is for zemgus
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
23 févr. à 17 h 42
#9
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 5,832
Mentions "j'aime": 3,816
Quoting: JosephSakic
basically all the package including picks is for zemgus


Girgs is our longest tenured player & wears an A for us
That’s worth more to us than a 4th
And nothing else in that package has any value for us that we’d want

We’ll likely keep him if that’s the best offer

And we aren’t retaining on Johnson & Girgs for free either
23 févr. à 17 h 43
#10
Démarrer sujet
SakicMacFarland CO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 117
Mentions "j'aime": 43
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
Girgs is our longest tenured player & wears an A for us
That’s worth more to us than a 4th
And nothing else in that package has any value for us that we’d want

We’ll likely keep him if that’s the best offer


fair enough, just know we would take good care of him
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
23 févr. à 17 h 45
#11
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 5,832
Mentions "j'aime": 3,816
Quoting: JosephSakic
fair enough, just know we would take good care of him


lol
You’ve also got us retaining on 2 players in this deal & getting no compensation back
It just doesn’t work at all for us

Trades need to work for BOTH SIDES dude
23 févr. à 17 h 46
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,888
Mentions "j'aime": 4,745
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
Sure
But if YOU “need” us to take contracts, it’s not gonna count towards any “value” in the trade
We’d just assume take expiring contracts from u guys & get better draft picks


Certainly, but tbh there's nothing there that really works for the Avs either. ZG is kinda 'meh' to us though I get why he means a lot to BUF fans, and tbh I'd rather give Meyers a shot there over making that trade. EJ is sentiment more than anything but he might help with the leadership issues that the Avs seem to be suffering from. Losing the Condor and Landy at the same time wasn't great for the Avs.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
23 févr. à 17 h 46
#13
Démarrer sujet
SakicMacFarland CO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 117
Mentions "j'aime": 43
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
lol
You’ve also got us retaining on 2 players in this deal & getting no compensation back
It just doesn’t work at all for us

Trades need to work for BOTH SIDES dude


ok, you guys can keep them both until free agency. no issue with us
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
23 févr. à 17 h 47
#14
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 5,832
Mentions "j'aime": 3,816
Quoting: JosephSakic
ok, you guys can keep them both until free agency. no issue with us


And we are ok with that
U want us to give them to you essentially for free
And that’s ABSURD
23 févr. à 17 h 51
#15
Démarrer sujet
SakicMacFarland CO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 117
Mentions "j'aime": 43
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
And we are ok with that
U want us to give them to you essentially for free
And that’s ABSURD


ehh I mean a 4th and 7th round pick in this hockey economy aren't essentially free, but if its not good for you than we can just chit chat with them in July. all good
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
23 févr. à 17 h 52
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 8,549
Mentions "j'aime": 6,440
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
Sabres could do something like this imo
We don’t really have use for the players though,
we’d probably just want better picks


Quoting: TJTwolf
Problem is contracts have to go out for contracts to come in. Something a lot of people forget (not suggesting you have, just that it gets forgotten) is the contract limit.


I'm good with this, plus macdermid would be fine as a 7th d or 13th forward, at least for the remainder of the season in a tryout role. Not doing Meyers any favors here, there's no room at all. He's ahl bound.
TJTwolf et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
23 févr. à 17 h 54
#17
Démarrer sujet
SakicMacFarland CO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 117
Mentions "j'aime": 43
Quoting: sabres89
I'm good with this, plus macdermid would be fine as a 7th d or 13th forward, at least for the remainder of the season in a tryout role. Not doing Meyers any favors here, there's no room at all. He's ahl bound.


people sleep on Meyers ill tell ya that. if anything you guys use MacDermid to police and we sub out another NHL Ahl fringe player for Meyers (we need to do two contracts for two)
TJTwolf et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
23 févr. à 17 h 55
#18
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 5,832
Mentions "j'aime": 3,816
Quoting: JosephSakic
ehh I mean a 4th and 7th round pick in this hockey economy aren't essentially free, but if its not good for you than we can just chit chat with them in July. all good


A 7th is basically nothing
And a 4th (maybe) covers the retention

So like i said, u essentially want them for free
ZERO CHANCE
23 févr. à 17 h 57
#19
Démarrer sujet
SakicMacFarland CO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 117
Mentions "j'aime": 43
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
A 7th is basically nothing
And a 4th (maybe) covers the retention

So like i said, u essentially want them for free
ZERO CHANCE


alright, I get the 7th being nothing but there's some khl kids that beg to differ
23 févr. à 17 h 58
#20
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 5,832
Mentions "j'aime": 3,816
Quoting: sabres89
I'm good with this, plus macdermid would be fine as a 7th d or 13th forward, at least for the remainder of the season in a tryout role. Not doing Meyers any favors here, there's no room at all. He's ahl bound.


Macdermid is UFA after this season
And we already have guys to play 7th D or 13th F
He has no value to us
23 févr. à 18 h 0
#21
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 5,832
Mentions "j'aime": 3,816
Quoting: JosephSakic
alright, I get the 7th being nothing but there's some khl kids that beg to differ


We aren’t interested in a lotto ticket dude

A more reasonable deal….
A 3rd & 6th for Girgs & Johnson
If u want retention, make it two 3rds

And as i said, we’ll take back contracts if u need us to,
but just make them expiring contracts u don’t want bc these players you’re offering have no value to us
BUFF742 a aimé ceci.
23 févr. à 18 h 31
#22
thewookie1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,495
Mentions "j'aime": 1,049
We’ll take the bodies to even out the contracts but we’ll need that 26 3rd and 25 4th
23 févr. à 18 h 33
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,084
Mentions "j'aime": 774
You aren't getting Henrique AND dumping Johansen for that. Behrens and Foudy are no-value adds given the Ducks have multiple better prospects already.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage