SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Not quite a rebuild

Créé par: The420SusMan69
Équipe: 2023-24 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 22 févr. 2024
Publié: 22 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Basically targeting younger players instead of draft picks.
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Barron, Justin
Détails additionnels:
1-3 year extension in place (1-2 million)
MTL
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2024 (CHI)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2026 (VAN)
2.
CGY
  1. Lundkvist, Nils
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (DAL)
DAL
  1. Tanev, Christopher (2 250 000 $ retained)
3.
CGY
  1. Lundell, Anton
  2. Sourdif, Justin
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (FLA)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (FLA)
  5. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (FLA)
FLA
  1. Hanifin, Noah (2 475 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
7x7 extension
4.
CGY
  1. Broberg, Philip
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2024 (NSH)
EDM
  1. Rooney, Kevin
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (FLA)
5.
CGY
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (PHI)
Détails additionnels:
(obviously they won't have Carter Hart back for awhile/ever)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de CGY
Logo de DAL
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de NJD
Logo de PHI
Logo de CGY
Logo de NSH
2025
Logo de FLA
Logo de CGY
Logo de FLA
Logo de CGY
Logo de FLA
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2026
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2083 500 000 $72 940 832 $0 $3 902 500 $10 559 168 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
813 333 $813 333 $ (Bonis de performance15 000 $$15K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance275 000 $$275K)
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
22 févr. à 22 h 1
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 788
Mentions "j'aime": 362
You have a good start for the Florida trade (especially if we lose either Forsling or Montour this offseason) but Lundell isn’t being trade.
22 févr. à 22 h 3
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 444
Mentions "j'aime": 127
Quoting: Rolfadinho
You have a good start for the Florida trade (especially if we lose either Forsling or Montour this offseason) but Lundell isn’t being trade.


is the value ok? or is it just Lundell himself being the issue
cuz you don't rly have anything of equal value to replace him with
22 févr. à 22 h 5
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 2,776
Mentions "j'aime": 1,775
Ya your not close with the barron trade
Just_A_Guess a aimé ceci.
22 févr. à 22 h 7
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 788
Mentions "j'aime": 362
Quoting: AdamL188
is the value ok? or is it just Lundell himself being the issue
cuz you don't rly have anything of equal value to replace him with


Value wise is ok, but Lundell is an important piece to our now & future. Not certain who to replace him with, but I don’t expect him to be traded.
22 févr. à 22 h 8
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 444
Mentions "j'aime": 127
Quoting: Black61
Ya your not close with the barron trade


i asked the MTL subreddit cuz I didn't know his value lol, they told me abt a 3rd round pick
22 févr. à 22 h 8
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 444
Mentions "j'aime": 127
Quoting: Rolfadinho
Value wise is ok, but Lundell is an important piece to our now & future. Not certain who to replace him with, but I don’t expect him to be traded.


I guess it isn't meant to be
22 févr. à 22 h 32
#7
Berkly goat Catton
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 5,992
Mentions "j'aime": 2,378
Barron cost Coronato. Nothing less
BorisBagel a aimé ceci.
22 févr. à 22 h 42
#8
Go Habs Go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 10,668
Mentions "j'aime": 4,100
Quoting: AdamL188
i asked the MTL subreddit cuz I didn't know his value lol, they told me abt a 3rd round pick


Nils Lundkvist is the most recent young RHD for picks trade I can think of and brought a 1st and 4th.
IF Montreal were to trade Barron for pick(s), it should be for a 1st at a minimum.

There are a lot of fans who are not on board with proper rebuild and development, that have no patience for grooming a young player into an effective NHLer over time.
They might be willing to throw away any player not having an immediate impact in order to rush someone else into that spot (Mailloux and Reinbacher) and those will be the same fans who complain when we trade a promising young defenseman for the next Gomez or Drouin, while that defender goes on to realize their potential elsewhere.
Just_A_Guess et MountRoyal a aimé ceci.
22 févr. à 22 h 44
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 444
Mentions "j'aime": 127
Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
Barron cost Coronato. Nothing less


Quoting: ricochetii
Nils Lundkvist is the most recent young RHD for picks trade I can think of and brought a 1st and 4th.
IF Montreal were to trade Barron for pick(s), it should be for a 1st at a minimum.

There are a lot of fans who are not on board with proper rebuild and development, that have no patience for grooming a young player into an effective NHLer over time.
They might be willing to throw away any player not having an immediate impact in order to rush someone else into that spot (Mailloux and Reinbacher) and those will be the same fans who complain when we trade a promising young defenseman for the next Gomez or Drouin, while that defender goes on to realize their potential elsewhere.


oh ok, your subreddit just despises him I guess
23 févr. à 5 h 26
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 361
Mentions "j'aime": 151
Flyers don't need a goalie. Erssons net with Petersen the rest of the year and Errson with Petersen/Kolosov/Sandstrom backing next year.
johum7 a aimé ceci.
23 févr. à 9 h 40
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 669
Mentions "j'aime": 236
if you gave the flyers a 4th they might take vladar. they do not need a goalie
23 févr. à 14 h 37
#12
Flood Geologist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 471
Mentions "j'aime": 241
Quoting: AdamL188
oh ok, your subreddit just despises him I guess


he is a talented but not completely developed player, with at least a year to go before we know for sure if he can secure his potential as a 2nd pairing D (he has shown flashes) or if he stalls and ends up as a 6-7 D or bubble player. because he is young enough, cheap enough, and with time to grow, no need for habs to move him unless its an overpay
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage