SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Seattle and SJ swap

Créé par: Jacketsman61
Équipe: 2024-25 Blue Jackets de Columbus
Date de création initiale: 20 févr. 2024
Publié: 20 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
What do you think? The Seattle trade makes a lot of sense. The Jackets could use C depth and Seattle could use a high end winger. Both have struggled and could use a change of scenery.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
43 500 000 $
65 500 000 $
22 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
CBJ
  1. Wright, Shane
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (SEA)
SEA
  1. Johnson, Kent [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (LAK)
2.
CBJ
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (COL)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (COL)
COL
  1. Provorov, Ivan (2 300 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Roslovic 50% retained

TDL deal
3.
CBJ
  1. Ferraro, Mario
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (NJD)
SJS
  1. Boqvist, Adam
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (COL)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CBJ
Logo de SEA
Logo de NJD
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
2025
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de COL
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de VGK
2026
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2287 500 000 $78 896 666 $0 $8 012 500 $8 603 334 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
9 750 000 $9 750 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 200 000 $$3M)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C, AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
RFA
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance3 062 500 $$3M)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD
RFA
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
891 667 $891 667 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
9 583 333 $9 583 333 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance750 000 $$750K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
20 févr. à 22 h 13
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 2,150
Mentions "j'aime": 1,842
Sharks fans are going to (arguably rightfully) say that's not enough for Ferraro. I don't think he's the guy that makes sense for Columbus, we just need a really solid veteran 3LD and let Mateychuk pair with Severson on the 2nd pair next year.

I also don't think it makes sense to swap KJ for Wright. We've got plenty of center depth, and we have a top-end center in Fantilli in all likelihood. One of Jenner, Sillinger, or Voronkov should step in to be a good 2C, one will be a devastatingly good 3C (Jenner the goal scorer, Sillinger the defensive shutdown guy, or Voronkov the overall beast), and all 3 of those would be wasted on the 4th line. I think Wright is more of what we have: top-6 potential C's that are likely to land in the middle-6.

Johnson, on the other hand, has a good shot at being THE winger, the guy with the skill and creativity to actually drive play and score a bunch of points. The guy Gaudreau should be. Every other winger we have isn't inspiring as a 1st-liner, Marchenko Chinakhov, Laine, and Gaudreau are all great 2nd-liners and are a luxury on the 3rd line. If one of those can break out (or bounce back) and Johnson can keep developing, we should be set in the system at wing too.

The Provorov deal I'm totally fine with, I just don't think Colorado is the team to pay that this season.
Rob32sjsharks a aimé ceci.
20 févr. à 22 h 42
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,509
Mentions "j'aime": 9,137
COL needs a C and back up goalie why are they trading prime assets for a dman?
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
20 févr. à 22 h 52
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,286
Mentions "j'aime": 4,688
Boqvist isn’t on the same level as Ferraro, both about the same age Boqvist has more offensive potential and Ferraro is more a stay home D guy. The biggest difference though has to be Ferraro is having a good season and Boqvist is having his worst, that combined with the NJD pick being a potential 1st if NJD make the ECF would make this a horrible deal.
20 févr. à 23 h 47
#4
Novistic
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 815
Mentions "j'aime": 383
That makes zero sense for the avs.
And also, Shane Wright will not accept that kind of trade for him. He barely accept the fact that he was picked 4th overall
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
21 févr. à 0 h 15
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2024
Messages: 100
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Sharks pass, basically no upside. even if you take the 2nd out, a late first not worth a ton and Boquist is eh. Ferraro is within age bracket for sharks rebuild and a decent 2 pairing guy when (currently playing top pairing and he isn't one). If you include Jirieck then we can talk more.
21 févr. à 11 h 36
#6
Be formless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 2,915
Mentions "j'aime": 1,056
Quoting: CaseyFlyman
Sharks fans are going to (arguably rightfully) say that's not enough for Ferraro. I don't think he's the guy that makes sense for Columbus, we just need a really solid veteran 3LD and let Mateychuk pair with Severson on the 2nd pair next year.

I also don't think it makes sense to swap KJ for Wright. We've got plenty of center depth, and we have a top-end center in Fantilli in all likelihood. One of Jenner, Sillinger, or Voronkov should step in to be a good 2C, one will be a devastatingly good 3C (Jenner the goal scorer, Sillinger the defensive shutdown guy, or Voronkov the overall beast), and all 3 of those would be wasted on the 4th line. I think Wright is more of what we have: top-6 potential C's that are likely to land in the middle-6.

Johnson, on the other hand, has a good shot at being THE winger, the guy with the skill and creativity to actually drive play and score a bunch of points. The guy Gaudreau should be. Every other winger we have isn't inspiring as a 1st-liner, Marchenko Chinakhov, Laine, and Gaudreau are all great 2nd-liners and are a luxury on the 3rd line. If one of those can break out (or bounce back) and Johnson can keep developing, we should be set in the system at wing too.

The Provorov deal I'm totally fine with, I just don't think Colorado is the team to pay that this season.


I'm as hyped as anyone about Mateychuk's future, but I think expecting him to play 2nd pair next year is a mistake. He hasn't earned an NHL spot yet. I really see Provorov staying there at least until the 2025 deadline.
21 févr. à 11 h 43
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 2,150
Mentions "j'aime": 1,842
Quoting: Hockey_Soul
I'm as hyped as anyone about Mateychuk's future, but I think expecting him to play 2nd pair next year is a mistake. He hasn't earned an NHL spot yet. I really see Provorov staying there at least until the 2025 deadline.


I don't dislike that idea, and honestly we might get more for Provorov next deadline than at anytime this season or offseason. Mateychuk looked good in the preseason, and arguably deserved a shot on the roster more than Jiricek, who's been playing in the top-4 at points this season. I don't think he'll have too much trouble adjusting, and his play style isn't really a fit for the 3rd pair, but he'd definitely need to earn that spot in the preseason/early next season.

The key though is that it doesn't make sense for CBJ to trade significant futures for a different 2LD until 1) we've properly evaluated Mateychuk, and 2) Provorov no longer fills that role.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage