SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Canucks Players Really Want Tanev

Créé par: KingofRnR
Équipe: 2023-24 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 15 févr. 2024
Publié: 15 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Canucks want Tanev and Flames want Players + Picks + Prospects. Tanev extends with VAN for 2-3 Years. CGY doesn’t retain and VAN doesn’t give up another 1st

VAN Traded for Zadorov to replace Soucy and Kessel or Duehr can replace Suter/Lafferty in the lineup. This also opens up Cap Space for next years Signings

Klimovich is additional compensation for the delayed 2nd RD Pick. Woo is so Pysyk can be called up

CGY Provides a 2024 Pick, Oesterle for Depth and Duehr for Size and to balance it all out opening up a Roster Spot for Schwindt, Klapka or Coronato
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Klimovich, Danila
  2. Soucy, Carson
  3. Suter, Pius
  4. Woo, Jett
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (VAN)
Détails additionnels:
If not Suter than Lafferty
VAN
2.
CGY
    To Whichever Team
    NJD
    1. Hanifin, Noah
    Détails additionnels:
    Traded
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2024
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de NJD
    Logo de CGY
    2025
    Logo de FLA
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    2026
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2383 500 000 $77 045 832 $0 $227 500 $6 454 168 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
    AD, AG
    NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
    AG, C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
    C, AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    863 333 $863 333 $
    AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    775 000 $775 000 $
    AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    762 500 $762 500 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    855 833 $855 833 $
    AD, C
    RFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
    DG/DD
    NTC
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    G
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    775 000 $775 000 $
    DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    813 333 $813 333 $ (Bonis de performance15 000 $$15K)
    G
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
    DG/DD
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    775 000 $775 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    762 500 $762 500 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
    AG, AD, C
    RFA - 1
    Équipe de réserve
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    833 333 $833 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
    AD
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    775 000 $775 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    DD
    RFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    15 févr. à 19 h 25
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2016
    Messages: 14,582
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,156
    They need to learn Boston's lesson from last season. Don't upset the wagon when things are going well.

    So far this season, they're the single most potent offensive team in the salary cap era by a large margin in terms of shooting percentage. Whatever they're doing is working. Don't mess with it.
    palhal, kingkanuck et remowilliams a aimé ceci.
    15 févr. à 19 h 27
    #2
    LongtimeLeafsufferer
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2015
    Messages: 59,813
    Mentions "j'aime": 22,837
    Not sure if the trade makes the Canucks better. Trading one Tanev for two Canuck regulars, Soucy and Suter.
    Sure Soucy is from Alberta but does he waive his NTC?
    15 févr. à 19 h 41
    #3
    Judd Bracket ripoff
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 6,960
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,581
    soucy to tanev is barely an upgrade. infact, given soucy's size and term, you could argue its a downgrade.

    suter is a very valuable piece to the canucks this year.

    easy decline

    id rather jsut do tanev 50% retained for a 1st
    15 févr. à 19 h 49
    #4
    Démarrer sujet
    TrevorA
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2021
    Messages: 6,839
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,856
    Quoting: tkecanuck341
    They need to learn Boston's lesson from last season. Don't upset the wagon when things are going well.

    So far this season, they're the single most potent offensive team in the salary cap era by a large margin in terms of shooting percentage. Whatever they're doing is working. Don't mess with it.

    All that’s really changing is Suter out and Tanev in with Tocchet thinking about bringing Kessel in as well

    Quoting: palhal
    Not sure if the trade makes the Canucks better. Trading one Tanev for two Canuck regulars, Soucy and Suter.
    Sure Soucy is from Alberta but does he waive his NTC?

    Most importantly this Trades keeps Quinn Hughes and the rest of his former Teammates happy

    Quoting: The_Rocket
    soucy to tanev is barely an upgrade. infact, given soucy's size and term, you could argue its a downgrade.

    suter is a very valuable piece to the canucks this year.

    easy decline

    id rather jsut do tanev 50% retained for a 1st

    Lafferty can easily replace Suter, but I’ll take either guy

    Tanev >> Soucy. Tanev is a Top-4 D-Man whereas Soucy’s a 5th-6th D-Man I’d use on the 3rd Pairing
    15 févr. à 19 h 51
    #5
    Judd Bracket ripoff
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 6,960
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,581
    Quoting: KingofRnR
    Lafferty can easily replace Suter, but I’ll take either guy


    suter is much better than lafferty and is signed next year to a very low cost number. the value difference between the two is high

    Quoting: KingofRnR
    Tanev >> Soucy. Tanev is a Top-4 D-Man whereas Soucy’s a 5th-6th D-Man I’d use on the 3rd Pairing


    you very obviously have not watched soucy this year when hes healthy
    15 févr. à 19 h 55
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    TrevorA
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2021
    Messages: 6,839
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,856
    Quoting: The_Rocket
    suter is much better than lafferty and is signed next year to a very low cost number. the value difference between the two is high



    you very obviously have not watched soucy this year when hes healthy

    I’ve been watching Soucy since he joined the Kraken

    Lafferty & Suter have pretty equal value. In fact CF has Lafferty rated higher than Suter right now. Both Score at the same clip and kill penalties, but Lafferty is Bigger, More Physical and a Right Shot while Suter is supposed to be Better Offensively and Plays More Minutes. I went with Suter for the additional year of term but again, would accept Lafferty instead
    15 févr. à 20 h 31
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2016
    Messages: 14,582
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,156
    Quoting: KingofRnR
    All that’s really changing is Suter out and Tanev in with Tocchet thinking about bringing Kessel in as well


    If they haven't already made other changes like bringing in Zadorov, bringing in Lindholm, and sending out Kuzmenko, then it might not be that big of a deal. Now they're going to bring in Kessel and Tanev, and send out Suter?

    Boston's moves looked great on paper too, but they rocked the boat too much and paid for it in the playoffs. Don't follow them down the path to failure.
    15 févr. à 20 h 40
    #8
    Démarrer sujet
    TrevorA
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2021
    Messages: 6,839
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,856
    Quoting: tkecanuck341
    If they haven't already made other changes like bringing in Zadorov, bringing in Lindholm, and sending out Kuzmenko, then it might not be that big of a deal. Now they're going to bring in Kessel and Tanev, and send out Suter?

    Boston's moves looked great on paper too, but they rocked the boat too much and paid for it in the playoffs. Don't follow them down the path to failure.

    I get your point, but Hughes and the Boys want Tanev…
    15 févr. à 20 h 42
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2016
    Messages: 14,582
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,156
    Quoting: KingofRnR
    I get your point, but Hughes and the Boys want Tanev…


    Fair enough. I'll enjoy watching them get eliminated by the 2nd wildcard in the 1st round after winning the President's Trophy.
    Fox_Czar_Cup a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage