SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

TDL maybe

Créé par: Speam
Équipe: 2023-24 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 8 févr. 2024
Publié: 9 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
WSH
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (NYR)
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2025 (MIN)
2.
SJS
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2025 (NYR)
3.
NYR
  1. Beauvillier, Anthony (2 075 000 $ retained)
CHI
  1. Pitlick, Tyler
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (NYR)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2025
Logo de NYR
Logo de DAL
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2026
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $82 862 416 $610 892 $882 500 $637 584 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 325 000 $2 325 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 075 000 $2 075 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
828 333 $828 333 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
762 500 $762 500 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 225 000 $1 225 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 641 667 $3 641 667 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
800 000 $800 000 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AD
NTC
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Rangers de New York
812 500 $812 500 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 666 667 $5 666 667 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 872 000 $3 872 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
825 000 $825 000 $ (Bonis de performance100 000 $$100K)
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
825 000 $825 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 437 500 $4 437 500 $
C, AG
UFA - 4

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
9 févr. à 14 h 31
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 140
Mentions "j'aime": 64
I like Sturm for that price, but I don't think Sharks are trading him. Beauvillier would be nice. Aube-Kubel would be another nice addition for the bottom 6. Don't know if this is the direction the Rangers are going.
Speam a aimé ceci.
9 févr. à 14 h 33
#2
aecliptic
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,947
Mentions "j'aime": 1,284
Quoting: Kodiak51
I like Sturm for that price, but I don't think Sharks are trading him. Beauvillier would be nice. Aube-Kubel would be another nice addition for the bottom 6. Don't know if this is the direction the Rangers are going.


It would be wise for the Rangers to go the cheap route for the bottom 6. No reason to overpay. However I think 3C is more of a priority than 4C. I also think if they're gonna make a splash, they're gonna get someone better than Beauvillier for RW.

Goodrow, Brodz, Vesey is a fine 4th line I feel, with Pitlick as a depth guy.
Kodiak51 a aimé ceci.
9 févr. à 14 h 39
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 909
Mentions "j'aime": 1,056
Done
Speam, Hawksguy81 et Garak a aimé ceci.
9 févr. à 14 h 39
#4
Démarrer sujet
Speam
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 59
Mentions "j'aime": 21
Quoting: aecliptic
It would be wise for the Rangers to go the cheap route for the bottom 6. No reason to overpay. However I think 3C is more of a priority than 4C. I also think if they're gonna make a splash, they're gonna get someone better than Beauvillier for RW.

Goodrow, Brodz, Vesey is a fine 4th line I feel, with Pitlick as a depth guy.


I think Brodzinski has been fine at 3C. Cuylle Kakko and him have been the best line over the past couple games. I think the bigger focus would be on a top 6 RW, but I’m not really sold on giving up a first round pick for retreads like Vatrano or Tarasenko. I was just thinking of trying to do a repeat of the original Vatrano trade 2 years ago by picking up an underperforming, still decently young/speedy player for cheap.
9 févr. à 14 h 41
#5
sharcuda22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 1,827
Mentions "j'aime": 574
That’s a little of an underpayment for sturmsy i think especially for two play off runs.
Speam a aimé ceci.
9 févr. à 14 h 47
#6
aecliptic
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,947
Mentions "j'aime": 1,284
Quoting: Speam
I think Brodzinski has been fine at 3C. Cuylle Kakko and him have been the best line over the past couple games. I think the bigger focus would be on a top 6 RW, but I’m not really sold on giving up a first round pick for retreads like Vatrano or Tarasenko. I was just thinking of trying to do a repeat of the original Vatrano trade 2 years ago by picking up an underperforming, still decently young/speedy player for cheap.


Fine isnt good for 3C in the playoffs. We need secondary/tertiary scoring from that line and its not happening. Id rather move Brodz down to 4C and bump Pitlick out of the lineup. Then go after a 3C that can provide some scoring and help the others to score as well.

The guys I want kind of go completely against what I said in my previous post, however, Sissons is a guy I really like for 3C and hes under a very nice contract for a couple more years. Another guy I really like is Jenner, however it may not be a Lindholm-esque price, but a 1st, a 4th and a prospect is likely the only way to get CBJ to even consider trading their captain.
9 févr. à 14 h 54
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 849
Mentions "j'aime": 322
Quoting: Kodiak51
I like Sturm for that price, but I don't think Sharks are trading him. Beauvillier would be nice. Aube-Kubel would be another nice addition for the bottom 6. Don't know if this is the direction the Rangers are going.


Quoting: sharcuda22
That’s a little of an underpayment for sturmsy i think especially for two play off runs.


I think the Sharks could get a 3rd for Sturm, he's a defensively solid guy on a good contract. Incredible faceoff guy as well.
Speam et sharcuda22 a aimé ceci.
9 févr. à 15 h 49
#8
Démarrer sujet
Speam
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 59
Mentions "j'aime": 21
Quoting: aecliptic
Fine isnt good for 3C in the playoffs. We need secondary/tertiary scoring from that line and its not happening. Id rather move Brodz down to 4C and bump Pitlick out of the lineup. Then go after a 3C that can provide some scoring and help the others to score as well.

The guys I want kind of go completely against what I said in my previous post, however, Sissons is a guy I really like for 3C and hes under a very nice contract for a couple more years. Another guy I really like is Jenner, however it may not be a Lindholm-esque price, but a 1st, a 4th and a prospect is likely the only way to get CBJ to even consider trading their captain.


Yea I like the Sissons idea. I more mean that I’d rather just roll with Brodz on the 3rd line as he’s proven it can work rather than give up assets for some rental like Henrique
9 févr. à 15 h 55
#9
aecliptic
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,947
Mentions "j'aime": 1,284
Quoting: Speam
Yea I like the Sissons idea. I more mean that I’d rather just roll with Brodz on the 3rd line as he’s proven it can work rather than give up assets for some rental like Henrique


Henrique I dont want, GMs will poach teams for center rentals, and Henrique is no different. Atleast with Sissons and Jenner, if we give up assets, it isnt for rentals. Also, the problem with Brodz at 3C... if something happens, we have no C depth.
Speam a aimé ceci.
9 févr. à 16 h 26
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 9,160
Mentions "j'aime": 11,161
Hawks accept
Garak a aimé ceci.
9 févr. à 22 h 43
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 4,385
Mentions "j'aime": 1,054
You probably think Goodrow and get you a good pick
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage