SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

offszn

Créé par: Simon27
Équipe: 2024-25 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 9 févr. 2024
Publié: 9 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
31 500 000 $
11 000 000 $
1850 000 $
54 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
43 700 000 $
66 000 000 $
55 000 000 $
22 000 000 $
Transactions
TOR
    Future Considerations
    CHI
    1. Kämpf, David
    2. Timmins, Conor
    3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (TOR)
    4. Choix de 5e ronde en 2025 (CHI)
    Enfoui
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2024
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de NYI
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de OTT
    2025
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    2026
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2087 500 000 $87 273 833 $0 $0 $226 167 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    925 000 $925 000 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    13 250 000 $13 250 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    11 500 000 $11 500 000 $
    AD
    NMC
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    RFA
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
    C, AG
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
    AD
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
    AD, C, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    935 833 $935 833 $
    AG, C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    800 000 $800 000 $
    C, AG
    RFA - 1
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    850 000 $850 000 $
    AG, AD
    RFA
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    DD
    UFA
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    766 667 $766 667 $
    G
    RFA - 1
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    DD
    RFA
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    843 333 $843 333 $
    G
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    9 févr. à 9 h 7
    #1
    FKA Bigtittielarper
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2020
    Messages: 7,728
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,226
    Leafs aren’t paying to dump kampf lmao
    9 févr. à 9 h 8
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2023
    Messages: 31
    Mentions "j'aime": 2
    Quoting: SomeonesOffended
    Leafs aren’t paying to dump kampf lmao


    Why not?
    9 févr. à 9 h 11
    #3
    FKA Bigtittielarper
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2020
    Messages: 7,728
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,226
    Quoting: Simon27
    Why not?


    Cause he’s 400k overpaid but he’s exactly what we need for a 4th line centre, besides kampf isn’t waiving for Chicago if anything the leafs half retain on him and get a 3rd from whatever team he waives for
    9 févr. à 9 h 12
    #4
    Snowhawk
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2022
    Messages: 2,405
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,421
    I don’t see the Hawks having an interest in three more seasons of Kämpf at $2.4m per, you can get an equally productive 4th line centre for a much better deal then that.
    9 févr. à 9 h 13
    #5
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2023
    Messages: 31
    Mentions "j'aime": 2
    Quoting: Snowhawk18
    I don’t see the Hawks having an interest in three more seasons of Kämpf at $2.4m per, you can get an equally productive 4th line centre for a much better deal then that.


    3rd and a 5th though
    Garak a aimé ceci.
    9 févr. à 9 h 18
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2022
    Messages: 8,708
    Mentions "j'aime": 10,557
    Quoting: Simon27
    3rd and a 5th though


    Hawks don't need more bottom 6 players. They're overloaded with those already. They need to fill out their forward group with a couple of offensive style players.
    Garak, SociallyHawkward, Snowhawk18 and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
    9 févr. à 9 h 21
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 10,858
    Mentions "j'aime": 10,653
    Quoting: Simon27
    3rd and a 5th though


    That is still $5.8M in salary owed. That is probably going to cost more.
    SociallyHawkward et Snowhawk18 a aimé ceci.
    9 févr. à 9 h 24
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2017
    Messages: 787
    Mentions "j'aime": 160
    Interesting! You have included Cowan on the roster, but not Minten. Hmmmm…..
    9 févr. à 9 h 29
    #9
    tylerh
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2018
    Messages: 486
    Mentions "j'aime": 19
    I would not be giving Liljegren 4.5m that would be like Zaitsev all over again.
    Forsling will get more than 5m and it wont be from the leafs
    Bc44 et Snowhawk18 a aimé ceci.
    9 févr. à 9 h 30
    #10
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2019
    Messages: 257
    Mentions "j'aime": 93
    Timothy Liljegren is not a 4.5 mill defenseman. Ethan Bear just signed for 2+mill,
    Kandre Miller signed for 3.8mill, Will Borgen for 2.7mill. All of these players are at least on par with what Liljegren brings. Im ok with the player and what he brings but hes a #5 #6 or #7 on any good NHL defence core. Lets ask what has the player done to separate himself from the player he was last season. Hes done very little with an ice time and role increase and has been dialed back on all fronts recently. On overdrive radio yesterday they have Rielly Brodie McCabe and Benoit as guys that are staying in the lineup moving fwd and into the deadline. Giordano and Liljegren are where the improvement is going to be. Liljegren could find himself in the press box much like last year and Leaf fans want to pay him 4.5 MILL WITH TERM. A player that brings what Liljegren currently brings can be found every offseason in the UFA market.
    Garak et Snowhawk18 a aimé ceci.
    9 févr. à 10 h 12
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 10,858
    Mentions "j'aime": 10,653
    Quoting: Bc44
    Timothy Liljegren is not a 4.5 mill defenseman. Ethan Bear just signed for 2+mill,
    Kandre Miller signed for 3.8mill, Will Borgen for 2.7mill. All of these players are at least on par with what Liljegren brings. Im ok with the player and what he brings but hes a #5 #6 or #7 on any good NHL defence core. Lets ask what has the player done to separate himself from the player he was last season. Hes done very little with an ice time and role increase and has been dialed back on all fronts recently. On overdrive radio yesterday they have Rielly Brodie McCabe and Benoit as guys that are staying in the lineup moving fwd and into the deadline. Giordano and Liljegren are where the improvement is going to be. Liljegren could find himself in the press box much like last year and Leaf fans want to pay him 4.5 MILL WITH TERM. A player that brings what Liljegren currently brings can be found every offseason in the UFA market.


    AFP Analytics Contract Predictions

    Maybe, but those comparisons will soon be outdated. AFP Analytics has him at $3.35M x 3 years, and I think that is conservative. With the pandemic escrow being paid off and the cap going up, the squeeze on player AAV's will likely be easing up significantly. Considering his age and performance, he could maybe get something in that $3-5M range. He has been more solid than TOR fans give him credit for, and he is still pretty young.
    9 févr. à 10 h 39
    #12
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2019
    Messages: 257
    Mentions "j'aime": 93
    Quoting: Garak
    AFP Analytics Contract Predictions

    Maybe, but those comparisons will soon be outdated. AFP Analytics has him at $3.35M x 3 years, and I think that is conservative. With the pandemic escrow being paid off and the cap going up, the squeeze on player AAV's will likely be easing up significantly. Considering his age and performance, he could maybe get something in that $3-5M range. He has been more solid than TOR fans give him credit for, and he is still pretty young.


    Liljegren will make the same percentage of the cap that he currently makes as he has done nothing to out play his current evaluation. So if the cap is 88mill his value would be around 2.5 mill give or take. He does not deserve a raise that is performance based. Any team that gives this player over 3 million dollars is asking for issues.
    Snowhawk18 a aimé ceci.
    9 févr. à 10 h 50
    #13
    Snowhawk
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2022
    Messages: 2,405
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,421
    Quoting: Simon27
    3rd and a 5th though


    Hawks got a 2nd round pick to take two seasons of Dickinson at $2.65m and they managed to send Riley Stillman at $1.15m the other way. Dickinson is a much better player than Kampf.

    3rd and 5th round picks misses the mark.
    9 févr. à 10 h 55
    #14
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2023
    Messages: 31
    Mentions "j'aime": 2
    Quoting: Hawksguy81
    Hawks don't need more bottom 6 players. They're overloaded with those already. They need to fill out their forward group with a couple of offensive style players.


    Doesn't need to be the hawks
    9 févr. à 10 h 56
    #15
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2023
    Messages: 31
    Mentions "j'aime": 2
    Quoting: Tylerh
    I would not be giving Liljegren 4.5m that would be like Zaitsev all over again.
    Forsling will get more than 5m and it wont be from the leafs


    Ok then give the extra money from the lily overpayment to forsling
    9 févr. à 10 h 56
    #16
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2023
    Messages: 31
    Mentions "j'aime": 2
    Quoting: junoandkeisha
    Interesting! You have included Cowan on the roster, but not Minten. Hmmmm…..


    Minten getting traded
    9 févr. à 10 h 59
    #17
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 10,858
    Mentions "j'aime": 10,653
    Quoting: Bc44
    Liljegren will make the same percentage of the cap that he currently makes as he has done nothing to out play his current evaluation. So if the cap is 88mill his value would be around 2.5 mill give or take. He does not deserve a raise that is performance based. Any team that gives this player over 3 million dollars is asking for issues.


    I mean... His baseline stats are pretty solid, as are his advanced metrics, and they have been steadily improving, all at only only 24 years old. I'm not sure what you want from the kid. I guess it really depends how TOR projects him and if they would rather lock him up with term now or give him a bridge deal. If it's a 1 or 2 year bridge deal, sure $2.5 would probably do the trick. But anything more, and he should be getting an AAV the reflects his development curve and career projection, which both say he is going to be a solid NHL dman for years to come.

    I think you are conflating TOR's cap situation and overall team performance with individual player values and performance. Also, him not being the kind of player TOR needs right now doesn't mean he isn't a good player. He could easily make that kind of money and be perfectly fine in a situation that is more suitable to his skillset. Speaking as if he is some awful bust is being way overblown. There is definitely value there that can be leveraged via trade, at the very least, if TOR doesn't want to keep him around.
    9 févr. à 11 h 36
    #18
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2019
    Messages: 257
    Mentions "j'aime": 93
    Quoting: Garak
    I mean... His baseline stats are pretty solid, as are his advanced metrics, and they have been steadily improving, all at only only 24 years old. I'm not sure what you want from the kid. I guess it really depends how TOR projects him and if they would rather lock him up with term now or give him a bridge deal. If it's a 1 or 2 year bridge deal, sure $2.5 would probably do the trick. But anything more, and he should be getting an AAV the reflects his development curve and career projection, which both say he is going to be a solid NHL dman for years to come.

    I think you are conflating TOR's cap situation and overall team performance with individual player values and performance. Also, him not being the kind of player TOR needs right now doesn't mean he isn't a good player. He could easily make that kind of money and be perfectly fine in a situation that is more suitable to his skillset. Speaking as if he is some awful bust is being way overblown. There is definitely value there that can be leveraged via trade, at the very least, if TOR doesn't want to keep him around.


    I never said bust. I said I ike the player. I usually give defenceman 300 NHL games to show who they are and are going to be moving fwd. Liljegren will hit 300 next year. Entering the last 3rd of that 100game evaluation he has been becoming an everyday NHL player in a bottom 6 role. With sheltered mins is showing ok avanced numbers but has yet to be trusted by the coach for any length of time. Unless something drastic happens in his development, which it can he is projecting to be a bottom pair NHL player. That by no means is a bust, getting regular mins out of a late 1st round pick is what teams want.
    At this point 100% accurate to say hes 24 years of age and approaching the he is what he is stage of his development. Projecting him to be much more than hes already is would be irresponsible.
    9 févr. à 12 h 29
    #19
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 10,858
    Mentions "j'aime": 10,653
    Quoting: Bc44
    I never said bust. I said I ike the player. I usually give defenceman 300 NHL games to show who they are and are going to be moving fwd. Liljegren will hit 300 next year. Entering the last 3rd of that 100game evaluation he has been becoming an everyday NHL player in a bottom 6 role. With sheltered mins is showing ok avanced numbers but has yet to be trusted by the coach for any length of time. Unless something drastic happens in his development, which it can he is projecting to be a bottom pair NHL player. That by no means is a bust, getting regular mins out of a late 1st round pick is what teams want.
    At this point 100% accurate to say hes 24 years of age and approaching the he is what he is stage of his development. Projecting him to be much more than hes already is would be irresponsible.


    I think TOR's problem is coaching and roster structure. What Keefe wants to do really only works in the regular season, and even then it's inconsistent enough to cause mass frustrations. But it definitely doesn't work in the playoffs and isn't conducive in the least bit to letting dmen play to their strengths and be defensemen. I think there is a very good chance if Lily goes to another team, he would have a ton of success and solidify himself in a top 4 role.

    I have a feeling that, even if TOR went out and got a guy like Tanev, he wouldn't do well.
    9 févr. à 12 h 47
    #20
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2022
    Messages: 39
    Mentions "j'aime": 17
    Why would Chicago ever agree to this? lol upgrade the picks
    9 févr. à 12 h 57
    #21
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2019
    Messages: 257
    Mentions "j'aime": 93
    Quoting: Garak
    I think TOR's problem is coaching and roster structure. What Keefe wants to do really only works in the regular season, and even then it's inconsistent enough to cause mass frustrations. But it definitely doesn't work in the playoffs and isn't conducive in the least bit to letting dmen play to their strengths and be defensemen. I think there is a very good chance if Lily goes to another team, he would have a ton of success and solidify himself in a top 4 role.

    I have a feeling that, even if TOR went out and got a guy like Tanev, he wouldn't do well.


    Bottom line is the team isnt very good. This year Matthews taveres marner willy are all 1st line players as expected. Knies , Bertuzzi Domi and Jarnkrok are all putting up 4th line numbers most nights and everyone else is basically NHL/AHL bubble players. The Defence has Rielly top pair and everyone else is a number 4/5/6/7 on any given night. Its hard to coach an island of misfit Toys and even harder to Build the team u want as a gm with barley an offseason under his belt. In my opion the Leafs need to keep assets this year, add veteran inexpensive players on expireing deals, make the playoffs and see what happens. Then give Treliving an offseason to build his team.
    Garak a aimé ceci.
    9 févr. à 13 h 27
    #22
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 10,858
    Mentions "j'aime": 10,653
    Quoting: Bc44
    Bottom line is the team isnt very good. This year Matthews taveres marner willy are all 1st line players as expected. Knies , Bertuzzi Domi and Jarnkrok are all putting up 4th line numbers most nights and everyone else is basically NHL/AHL bubble players. The Defence has Rielly top pair and everyone else is a number 4/5/6/7 on any given night. Its hard to coach an island of misfit Toys and even harder to Build the team u want as a gm with barley an offseason under his belt. In my opion the Leafs need to keep assets this year, add veteran inexpensive players on expireing deals, make the playoffs and see what happens. Then give Treliving an offseason to build his team.


    I think a new coach could go a long way at getting the best out of this team as it is currently constructed. Though, I also fear it might be too late. They've been playing together so long under Keefe that there might be culture conflicts that are hard to break. But they don't suck, they just aren't playing the right way.
    Simon27 a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage