SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Smell ya ceci

Créé par: Somms
Équipe: 2023-24 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 7 févr. 2024
Publié: 7 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
EDM
  1. Tanev, Christopher (2 250 000 $ retained)
CGY
  1. Ceci, Cody
  2. Savoie, Carter
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (EDM)
2.
EDM
  1. Jenner, Boone (1 750 000 $ retained)
CBJ
  1. Tullio, Tyler
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de NSH
2025
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2026
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $80 104 125 $850 000 $5 050 000 $3 395 875 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance650 000 $$650K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
775 000 $775 000 $ (Bonis de performance325 000 $$325K)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
775 000 $775 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 225 000 $$3M)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Flames de Calgary
-1 125 000 $-1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
762 500 $762 500 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
762 500 $762 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
874 125 $874 125 $
AD, C
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
7 févr. à 2 h 38
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2023
Messages: 264
Mentions "j'aime": 117
That Jenner offer is going to need at least one more pick probably 2 with retainment for this season and 2 more. Sounds like a mill retainment this TDL is going for a 4th. So on those ground Columbus says no
JacketsComrade a aimé ceci.
7 févr. à 6 h 24
#2
Nah.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,524
Mentions "j'aime": 4,449
Nowhere near enough for Boone, let alone with retention.

Considering those 1sts are all likely to be late, unless you want to throw three of them our way, and possibly add to that, really not sure EDM has the assets to make the move.

Also, Tyler Who-lio?
JacketsComrade a aimé ceci.
7 févr. à 7 h 32
#3
not a he )
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 3,317
Mentions "j'aime": 4,608
Colorado hears that offer and says “Ritchie and our first” and Kenny never gets a call back.
7 févr. à 8 h 0
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,124
Mentions "j'aime": 7,781
And then Tanev gets injured, as he always does, and you're left with Bouchard, Desharnais and Kemp (?) playing RD in the playoffs. Smart.

In any case, that pairing needs more puck skills, not less. A RH Ekholm, basically. So Tanev isn't a great fit.

Interesting that you put Jenner above McLeod on the depth chart, despite McLeod clearly being the better player.

Jenner v McLeod, 5v5 on-ice rates
7 févr. à 8 h 4
#5
Tank it baby
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 6,565
Mentions "j'aime": 4,471
Typical CFACGM Lowballing for Jenner.
7 févr. à 8 h 5
#6
Tank it baby
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 6,565
Mentions "j'aime": 4,471
Quoting: CD282
And then Tanev gets injured, as he always does, and you're left with Bouchard, Desharnais and Kemp (?) playing RD in the playoffs. Smart.

In any case, that pairing needs more puck skills, not less. A RH Ekholm, basically. So Tanev isn't a great fit.

Interesting that you put Jenner above McLeod on the depth chart, despite McLeod clearly being the better player.

Jenner v McLeod, 5v5 on-ice rates


Another baseless take by the resident Oilers homer. 🙄
7 févr. à 8 h 36
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,124
Mentions "j'aime": 7,781
Quoting: SharkTank
Another baseless take by the resident Oilers homer. 🙄

Baseless? I think you need to look up that word. tears of joy

I literally provided basis for my comments, unlike you who just resorted to name calling.
Somms a aimé ceci.
7 févr. à 11 h 46
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 967
Mentions "j'aime": 363
Quoting: CD282
And then Tanev gets injured, as he always does, and you're left with Bouchard, Desharnais and Kemp (?) playing RD in the playoffs. Smart.

In any case, that pairing needs more puck skills, not less. A RH Ekholm, basically. So Tanev isn't a great fit.

Interesting that you put Jenner above McLeod on the depth chart, despite McLeod clearly being the better player.

Jenner v McLeod, 5v5 on-ice rates


Tanev has missed one extended stretch of time since he's been in Calgary, and it's come out multiple times that if the Flames were in the race last year he would have played. The Tanev injury argument is so lazy.

Then to say McLeod is clearly the better player while providing the most narrow argument on the planet is just disingenuous at best. McLeod's extended stats are marginally better, he also doesn't play against the other teams best line every night, he's also on a team that has a +34 goal differential as opposed to -36, all of Jenner's expected goal stats are better than McLeod while having a lower PDO, McLEod has a negative relative expected goals on the Oilers, Jenner is positive on the bottom of the barrel Blue Jackets, Jenner is also creating more expected high danger chances than McLeod. All that to say that McLeod is a good enough middle sixer having a lucky year while on a really good team. Jenner is a significantly better player on a team that can't produce. I guarantee that you are the only person whether that be on this website, in the NHL possibly on the planet other than McLeod's mom who thinks he's better than Jenner.
7 févr. à 12 h 29
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 555
Mentions "j'aime": 239
If we're going for a new top-4 RHD and a bottom 6 forward I'd hope we go for Carrier (who is unfortunately injured now) and Novak on NSH.
If we're gunna go for a massive RHD upgrade I'd hope we just overpay for a legit top line RHD with term.

Agree that moving on from Ceci is the next logical step for us but Tanev isn't the one I'd hope to fit that bill.
From what Columbus fans have said on this site Jenner will be insanely expensive and ultimately that might not be worth it for us.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage