SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Flyers unrealistic offseason

Créé par: flyersflock
Équipe: 2024-25 Flyers de Philadelphie
Date de création initiale: 6 févr. 2024
Publié: 6 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
For the DeMelo contract, that could definitely age poorly but man is he good. He's playing some tough minutes too, he's a guy I could see being underpaid by a lot for sure. Instead of forcing Risto into 2nd pairing minutes, why not stick with what's worked? Good news is even if he's overpaid (i don't believe he is) it's not going to matter for the Michkov years since he'd be on an ELC. I'd consider paying more if his market value is greater (I'm not exactly sure what it should be, but as a 30yo I think that's about fair)
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 400 000 $
21 300 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 500 000 $
35 100 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Buium, Zeev
3950 000 $
Parekh, Zayne
3950 000 $
Transactions
1.
PHI
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (VGK)
VGK
  1. Laughton, Scott
Détails additionnels:
Flyers reportedly looking for a 1st. With Monahan deal just happening plus term we're just assuming the reports are correct
2.
PHI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (DAL)
Détails additionnels:
Dallas used 7D last playoff (all 10+ GP). I could see them doing that again, plus Seeler is fantastic as a low-end 2nd high end 3rd pairing D. All for league min
DAL
    Seeler
    3.
    PHI
    1. Zegras, Trevor
    Détails additionnels:
    I'm aware they just traded Drysdale, but I think this can work for both teams. 3OA pick (Lindstrom/Eiserman/Demidov I'm guessing), Carlsson, Gauthier, McTavish, Terry is already a scary top six. Plus Vatrano is pretty good too. To me Zegras becomes a luxury

    Instead they get someone who projects to be a top four D with picks along with it. Is this fair?
    ANA
    1. Bonk, Oliver
    2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (VGK)
    3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (DAL)
    Détails additionnels:
    The Flyers are getting someone comparable to Tippett with better offensive upside and one who (can) play center. No defense, all offense is what the Flyers need.

    With these other trades, you'll see why that makes sense
    4.
    PHI
    1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (MIN)
    Détails additionnels:
    Good PKer, good net-front guy at this point but not much else. Admittedly I'd be a bit surprised if the Flyers can get anything for him but for a third it's not going to kill Minnesota, I guess. IMO their bottom six is atrocious so Atkinson could maybe even move up to 2nd line
    MIN
    1. Atkinson, Cam (2 937 500 $ retained)
    5.
    PHI
    1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2026 (VAN)
    Détails additionnels:
    Again let me know if I'm wrong, but I could see Calgary wanting to get tougher this offseason. To me they just look like a four line team now. They have a bit of a 2020-2021 isles look to them. They could be a good team next season if Coleman, Zary continue doing what they're doing and Kuzmenko bounces back

    I'd be surprised if the Flames are blowing it up. Especially since it's something they didn't do in the Iginla era
    6.
    PHI
    1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (BUF)
    Détails additionnels:
    This is eighth overall right now

    Flyers take Zeev Buium
    BUF
    1. Bjarnason, Carson
    2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (PHI)
    3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (CBJ)
    4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2026 (VAN)
    Détails additionnels:
    For what is 18th overall right now but likely goes up. Buffalo getting more prospects could help them. I don't really think they need to land an elite D in this year's class so this just makes sense to me. Likely an early second, a 3rd AND Bjarnason to trade up maybe 10 spots at most? Not bad for Buffalo, but lmk if there should be more
    7.
    PHI
    1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
    Détails additionnels:
    There's your Ceci replacement! The first round pick rumors for Walker should be that way. He's playing 2nd line d minutes and competition and playing very well in that role. No brainer for Edmonton IMO especially since Tampa is reportedly interested, but let me know if this is too much
    EDM
      Walker
      8.
      PHI
      1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (ARI)
      Détails additionnels:
      You can definitely debate this one. This pick is 10OA for two picks likely to be late firsts and a third. But Arizona loves reaching for players, anyway. I think a second in this one (especially the Anaheim one) makes it an absolute yes but I don't think that's needed, this is just fair to me. Is it too little?

      Also, Flyers take Zayne Parekh
      ARI
      1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (FLA)
      2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
      3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (MIN)
      Rachats de contrats
      Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
      2024
      Logo de BUF
      Logo de ARI
      Logo de PHI
      Logo de PHI
      Logo de PHI
      Logo de LAK
      Logo de PHI
      Logo de STL
      Logo de PHI
      2025
      Logo de PHI
      Logo de PHI
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de PHI
      Logo de PHI
      Logo de PHI
      Logo de CAR
      Logo de PHI
      Logo de PHI
      2026
      Logo de PHI
      Logo de PHI
      Logo de PHI
      Logo de PHI
      Logo de PHI
      Logo de PHI
      Logo de PHI
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2287 700 000 $87 714 761 $245 000 $32 500 $-14 761 $

      Formation

      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
      5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
      C, AG
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
      5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
      6 200 000 $6 200 000 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 8
      Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
      7 750 000 $7 750 000 $
      C
      NMC
      UFA - 6
      Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
      830 833 $830 833 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
      AD
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
      863 333 $863 333 $
      AD
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
      2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
      C
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
      2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
      AD
      RFA
      Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
      1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
      C, AG
      UFA - 2
      1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
      C, AD
      UFA
      Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
      2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
      C, AG
      RFA - 1
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
      6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
      DG/DD
      NTC
      UFA - 7
      Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
      2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
      DD
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
      1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
      G
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
      1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
      DG/DD
      RFA - 1
      5 100 000 $5 100 000 $
      DD
      UFA
      Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
      5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
      G
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
      1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
      DG/DD
      RFA
      Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
      5 100 000 $5 100 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 3
      Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
      Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
      1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
      6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
      775 000 $775 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 1

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner
      6 févr. à 16 h 25
      #1
      19 lotteries, 0 wins
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: oct. 2017
      Messages: 1,243
      Mentions "j'aime": 767
      i would love zegras in the metro. beef beef beef. but torts won't like him
      6 févr. à 16 h 29
      #2
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2016
      Messages: 2,909
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,933
      0 interest from ANA
      GiggywithGibby et flyersflock a aimé ceci.
      6 févr. à 16 h 31
      #3
      Démarrer sujet
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2024
      Messages: 101
      Mentions "j'aime": 12
      Quoting: AndrewPawlack
      i would love zegras in the metro. beef beef beef. but torts won't like him


      Torts cooled off the Zegras hate train a little while back. I'm sure he wouldn't love it at times but Torts gets say in trades to my knowledge, he's basically a GM
      AndrewPawlack a aimé ceci.
      6 févr. à 16 h 32
      #4
      Future Ducks legend
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2022
      Messages: 10,274
      Mentions "j'aime": 7,063
      Vatrano doesn't make Zegras a luxury, he was a FA signing and while extremely likeable and fitting well in the system, is not a long term piece of this roster.

      If we're trading Zegras to Philly, we're extracting Bonk, Foerster, and Philly's first.
      flyersflock a aimé ceci.
      6 févr. à 16 h 33
      #5
      Démarrer sujet
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2024
      Messages: 101
      Mentions "j'aime": 12
      Quoting: Jded
      0 interest from ANA


      just so i know is there a specific reason why? obviously he's a good player but if their top six is something like:

      Gauthier-Carlsson-Demidov
      X-McTavish-Terry

      down the line, is Zegras that vital to the team? that's just what i was thinking. if it's the value i totally get that
      6 févr. à 16 h 35
      #6
      Démarrer sujet
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2024
      Messages: 101
      Mentions "j'aime": 12
      Quoting: GiggywithGibby
      Vatrano doesn't make Zegras a luxury, he was a FA signing and while extremely likeable and fitting well in the system, is not a long term piece of this roster.

      If we're trading Zegras to Philly, we're extracting Bonk, Foerster, and Philly's first.


      maybe i worded it poorly but i was more so thinking Demidov/Eiserman and Gauthier made him a luxury

      that package makes sense but to be honest if I'm anaheim i stay away from foerster. i don't see him as a first line forward ever but that's what the trade value would be
      6 févr. à 16 h 39
      #7
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2017
      Messages: 336
      Mentions "j'aime": 135
      Found Fletchers burner account /s
      6 févr. à 17 h 8
      #8
      See you space cowboy
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2023
      Messages: 2,090
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,157
      All offense no defense sounds terrible. Look how well its worked our for Edmonton.
      6 févr. à 17 h 17
      #9
      Future Ducks legend
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2022
      Messages: 10,274
      Mentions "j'aime": 7,063
      Quoting: flyersflock
      maybe i worded it poorly but i was more so thinking Demidov/Eiserman and Gauthier made him a luxury

      that package makes sense but to be honest if I'm anaheim i stay away from foerster. i don't see him as a first line forward ever but that's what the trade value would be


      I view him as potential second line guy, I'd prefer Tippet but that sweetheart deal he just signed jumped his value and I would assume he's untouchable after that.
      6 févr. à 17 h 37
      #10
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2016
      Messages: 2,909
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,933
      Quoting: flyersflock
      just so i know is there a specific reason why? obviously he's a good player but if their top six is something like:

      Gauthier-Carlsson-Demidov
      X-McTavish-Terry

      down the line, is Zegras that vital to the team? that's just what i was thinking. if it's the value i totally get that


      He’s absolutely vital. We have a dearth of scoring wingers, and he was one of our best the last 2 years as a 20 and 21 year old. We’d be unloading one of the things we need most.

      Even in your example top 6 where you assume we take Demidov and that he pans out, we have a gap exactly where Z fits as a top 6 LW (and on top of that my expectation/hope is that we take Levshunov). Without Demidov, we have 2 huge holes.

      On top of that, the value is also short. To be enticing for Z it’d need to be closer to a ~7ishOA ‘24 pick and Bonk. Not a late ‘25 1st and a 3rd.
      flyersflock a aimé ceci.
      6 févr. à 17 h 48
      #11
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2022
      Messages: 1,063
      Mentions "j'aime": 756
      Quoting: flyersflock
      just so i know is there a specific reason why? obviously he's a good player but if their top six is something like:

      Gauthier-Carlsson-Demidov
      X-McTavish-Terry

      down the line, is Zegras that vital to the team? that's just what i was thinking. if it's the value i totally get that


      For one, there is no reason to think they'll take Demidov. It's more likely they take Levshunov or Silayev IMO.

      As to the value, Bonk is a fine piece for Zegras but trying to push the pick to Vegas' 2025 1st is just not appealing. The pick is a year too late and in the wrong half of the round (25+ likely). Philly's first in 2024 would be a must.
      flyersflock a aimé ceci.
      6 févr. à 18 h 36
      #12
      Démarrer sujet
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2024
      Messages: 101
      Mentions "j'aime": 12
      Quoting: CHAR
      For one, there is no reason to think they'll take Demidov. It's more likely they take Levshunov or Silayev IMO.

      As to the value, Bonk is a fine piece for Zegras but trying to push the pick to Vegas' 2025 1st is just not appealing. The pick is a year too late and in the wrong half of the round (25+ likely). Philly's first in 2024 would be a must.


      Why'd they trade Drysdale if they're just going to draft another D over the high upside forwards at that spot? Verbeek confuses me if he's taking Levshunov, ESPECIALLY Silayev since he's another LHD
      6 févr. à 18 h 37
      #13
      Démarrer sujet
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2024
      Messages: 101
      Mentions "j'aime": 12
      Quoting: Jded
      He’s absolutely vital. We have a dearth of scoring wingers, and he was one of our best the last 2 years as a 20 and 21 year old. We’d be unloading one of the things we need most.

      Even in your example top 6 where you assume we take Demidov and that he pans out, we have a gap exactly where Z fits as a top 6 LW (and on top of that my expectation/hope is that we take Levshunov). Without Demidov, we have 2 huge holes.

      On top of that, the value is also short. To be enticing for Z it’d need to be closer to a ~7ishOA ‘24 pick and Bonk. Not a late ‘25 1st and a 3rd.


      I might have to rethink Konecny's value I suppose. That's the value for him in this economy? Sheesh, they could get so much for Konecny
      6 févr. à 18 h 40
      #14
      Démarrer sujet
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2024
      Messages: 101
      Mentions "j'aime": 12
      Quoting: GiggywithGibby
      I view him as potential second line guy, I'd prefer Tippet but that sweetheart deal he just signed jumped his value and I would assume he's untouchable after that.


      i'd assume the same. honestly i see zegras as a slightly better version of tippett which is why i offered so little (i thought it was too much, actually but i still went that high)

      at that point the ducks would hang onto him because no team but the flyers would ever think about giving that up, just because of the unique position of their rebuild
      6 févr. à 19 h 32
      #15
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2016
      Messages: 2,909
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,933
      Quoting: flyersflock
      I might have to rethink Konecny's value I suppose. That's the value for him in this economy? Sheesh, they could get so much for Konecny


      He’s a 22 year old back-to-back 60pt scorer on a reasonable RFA controlled contract. When UFA veterans like Monahan and Lindholm net 1st + ‘meh’ prospect, the value doesn’t seem outlandish at all. Blue chip pieces for blue chip pieces (just like the Drysdale Gauthier trade)
      6 févr. à 19 h 39
      #16
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2022
      Messages: 1,063
      Mentions "j'aime": 756
      Quoting: flyersflock
      Why'd they trade Drysdale if they're just going to draft another D over the high upside forwards at that spot? Verbeek confuses me if he's taking Levshunov, ESPECIALLY Silayev since he's another LHD


      In the NHL you draft BPA if you are smart. It's easy to assume that Verbeek likes one or the other defender better than Drysdale and Gauthier better than the forwards. Remember that Drysdale wasn't a Verbeek pick nor does he fit the physical profile the GMPV covets.

      WRT to Silayev. If you think he's in the same caliber as Hedman or Makar (ie a true #1 capable of winning the Norris) you draft him regardless of left or right. I'm not claiming he's that good but if the Ducks draft him it's a sure sign that they do think that. The Ducks have lots of good left D but nobody in that range. Fowler has been the Ducks top LHD for a long time and I don't think any one would argue with me saying he's a #2 or even a #3 guy at best. Mintyukov and Zellweger I think will both top out like Fowler.

      The best path to winning a cup includes having a #1 D. Or two. Nothing was better than the Ducks cup winning team with Scott Niedermayer and Chris Pronger on it.
       
      Répondre
      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
      Question:
      Options:
      Ajouter une option
      Soumettre le sondage