SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Realistic deadline

Créé par: AdamL188
Équipe: 2023-24 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 4 févr. 2024
Publié: 4 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Peeke, Andrew
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (CBJ)
CBJ
  1. Vladar, Daniel
  2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2025 (CGY)
2.
CGY
  1. Bahl, Kevin
  2. Stillman, Chase
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (NJD)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (NJD)
NJD
  1. Hanifin, Noah (2 475 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
7x7 extension
3.
CGY
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (NYI)
Détails additionnels:
(3rd is only if the Leafs reach ECF)
TOR
  1. Tanev, Christopher (2 250 000 $ retained)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de NJD
Logo de TOR
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de NYI
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CHI
Logo de CGY
2025
Logo de FLA
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de NJD
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2026
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2183 500 000 $77 895 832 $0 $1 077 500 $5 604 168 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
855 833 $855 833 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
813 333 $813 333 $ (Bonis de performance15 000 $$15K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
4 févr. à 20 h 46
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 4,325
Mentions "j'aime": 1,339
Deal. Think this deal is good for both sides. Would you rather Stillman or Clarke. I’d do either but I’m just curious
4 févr. à 20 h 47
#2
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 11,963
Mentions "j'aime": 3,160
Hefty price for a rental. If the bidding goes that high maybe but I don’t think it will
4 févr. à 20 h 55
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2024
Messages: 173
Mentions "j'aime": 81
Columbus doesn’t need Vladar. I’m sure they’d get better offers for Peeke
4 févr. à 20 h 58
#4
Future Norris guy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 15,605
Mentions "j'aime": 8,625
Columbus doesn't need Vladar when they already have Merzlikins and Tarasov. And Hanifin is going home to Boston and there's already a deal in place for Hanifin for whatever team acquires him 8 x $7,500,000 per Conroy.
4 févr. à 21 h 0
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 7,446
Mentions "j'aime": 3,188
Quoting: Devsfan25
Deal. Think this deal is good for both sides. Would you rather Stillman or Clarke. I’d do either but I’m just curious


Tough call there. Draft pedigree says Stillman but stats say Clarke might be a better choice. Then again Stillman isn't a pending RFA (Clarke is) and will be under team control longer.
AdamL188 et donald a aimé ceci.
4 févr. à 21 h 0
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 6,847
Mentions "j'aime": 1,982
Quoting: dgibb10
Hefty price for a rental. If the bidding goes that high maybe but I don’t think it will


Thats with an extension imo, otherwise pass. Keep the retention, Bahl and a 1st, maybe add the third to push it over.
Go get Ned, Trenin, Dumaime and one other defender (gotta find a couple schekles, or move a body)
4 févr. à 21 h 1
#7
Démarrer sujet
AdamL188
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 266
Mentions "j'aime": 58
Quoting: dgibb10
Hefty price for a rental. If the bidding goes that high maybe but I don’t think it will


it says 7x7 extension directly on the trade
4 févr. à 21 h 2
#8
Démarrer sujet
AdamL188
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 266
Mentions "j'aime": 58
Quoting: Devsfan25
Deal. Think this deal is good for both sides. Would you rather Stillman or Clarke. I’d do either but I’m just curious


prolly Clarke
4 févr. à 21 h 5
#9
Démarrer sujet
AdamL188
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 266
Mentions "j'aime": 58
Quoting: Dave26
Columbus doesn’t need Vladar. I’m sure they’d get better offers for Peeke


My guess is if they had offers for Peeke they'd take it. Jiricek is stuck in the AHL waiting for a Peeke trade so they'll go quickly. Same with Dustin Wolf for the flames.
CaseyFlyman a aimé ceci.
4 févr. à 21 h 9
#10
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 11,963
Mentions "j'aime": 3,160
Quoting: AdamL188
it says 7x7 extension directly on the trade


Yeah magically saying “with extension” doesn’t make a rental not a rental value
4 févr. à 21 h 11
#11
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 11,963
Mentions "j'aime": 3,160
Quoting: Smitty426
Thats with an extension imo, otherwise pass. Keep the retention, Bahl and a 1st, maybe add the third to push it over.
Go get Ned, Trenin, Dumaime and one other defender (gotta find a couple schekles, or move a body)


With an extension isn’t a real thing that increases rental value imo
4 févr. à 21 h 11
#12
n.1 Topias Vilen fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 5,928
Mentions "j'aime": 2,577
Quoting: Devsfan25
Deal. Think this deal is good for both sides. Would you rather Stillman or Clarke. I’d do either but I’m just curious


We don't have the cap space to make it work after this year or next, especially since we need a goalie
4 févr. à 21 h 29
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 4,325
Mentions "j'aime": 1,339
Quoting: pretzelcoatl
We don't have the cap space to make it work after this year or next, especially since we need a goalie


https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/4868824

Sure about that?
4 févr. à 21 h 41
#14
n.1 Topias Vilen fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 5,928
Mentions "j'aime": 2,577
Quoting: Devsfan25
https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/4868824

Sure about that?


We will have significant bonus overages, as much as 5.5m of dead cap each of the next two years. Likely closer to 3m but still needs to be accounted for. And the big cap crunch is 2025-26
4 févr. à 21 h 48
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 6,847
Mentions "j'aime": 1,982
Quoting: dgibb10
With an extension isn’t a real thing that increases rental value imo


No I'm saying dint trade for him as a rental, that's all.
No need to give up those assets unless they are keeping him.
dgibb10 a aimé ceci.
4 févr. à 22 h 28
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 2,077
Mentions "j'aime": 1,746
That's a yes from me, under the assumption that Columbus looks to move Tarasov too (or waive him). He's been anywhere from bad to atrocious this year. Vladar would be a good backup until Greaves is fully ready, and getting Peeke out the door ASAP is an objectively good thing for the organization.
4 févr. à 22 h 29
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 4,325
Mentions "j'aime": 1,339
Quoting: pretzelcoatl
We will have significant bonus overages, as much as 5.5m of dead cap each of the next two years. Likely closer to 3m but still needs to be accounted for. And the big cap crunch is 2025-26


Already thought of that. Cap is 87.7 next year and 92.1 in 25-26
https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/4868853
4 févr. à 22 h 57
#18
n.1 Topias Vilen fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 5,928
Mentions "j'aime": 2,577
Quoting: Devsfan25
Already thought of that. Cap is 87.7 next year and 92.1 in 25-26
https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/4868853


Clearly you did not think of that, because you still haven't accounted for bonus overages. Very high probability you're over the cap there
4 févr. à 23 h 14
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 4,325
Mentions "j'aime": 1,339
Quoting: pretzelcoatl
Clearly you did not think of that, because you still haven't accounted for bonus overages. Very high probability you're over the cap there


Still have 1.9m in cap left here and that’s with 23 guys. If we have to carry 22 or even 21, you do it. Cup winning teams rarely are able to carry full roster during the year
5 févr. à 3 h 6
#20
Dr_Invictus
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 2,278
Mentions "j'aime": 878
Quoting: AdamL188
it says 7x7 extension directly on the trade


What's the point in negotiating the extension at 7x7, when the whole point of acquiring him is to have the leverage of an 8th year over other teams?

Also, I doubt Hanifin gets a smaller return than Lindholm given he is having a better year and is younger.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage