SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Zadorov

Créé par: FromNunavut
Équipe: 2023-24 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 29 janv. 2024
Publié: 29 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Ceci, Cody
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (EDM)
2.
EDM
    Waivers
    Rachats de contrats
    Enfoui
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2024
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de NSH
    2025
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    2026
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2183 500 000 $83 005 000 $850 000 $5 050 000 $495 000 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
    AG, C
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
    C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
    C, AG
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
    AG, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance650 000 $$650K)
    AG, C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    775 000 $775 000 $ (Bonis de performance325 000 $$325K)
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    775 000 $775 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 225 000 $$3M)
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    900 000 $900 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    775 000 $775 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
    DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
    G
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    762 500 $762 500 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    762 500 $762 500 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DG
    RFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    29 janv. à 23 h 14
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2020
    Messages: 10,088
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,350
    Canucks pass easily. No interest in Ceci, and despite the rumour I can’t see us moving Zadorov (and even if we did it would be to clear cap space so taking back Ceci makes no sense)
    Vancity2196 et remowilliams a aimé ceci.
    29 janv. à 23 h 17
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2022
    Messages: 3,789
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,208
    Easy pass Canucks.
    Zadorov is untouchable and he's not available.
    29 janv. à 23 h 20
    #3
    Snowhawk
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2022
    Messages: 2,363
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,365
    So why exactly would the Hawks put in a waiver claim on Janmark?
    PaulKorea a aimé ceci.
    29 janv. à 23 h 57
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2022
    Messages: 1,023
    Mentions "j'aime": 330
    Oilers pass. Big Z is overrated.
    Somms et CD282 a aimé ceci.
    30 janv. à 0 h 4
    #5
    BigMeech
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2022
    Messages: 1,554
    Mentions "j'aime": 349
    Quoting: Snowhawk18
    So why exactly would the Hawks put in a waiver claim on Janmark?


    why not?
    Nothing 2 lose
    Other than games tears of joy
    30 janv. à 0 h 19
    #6
    Judd Bracket ripoff
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 6,939
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,578
    If Canucks do trade Zadorov it would only be to open up cap space. But that said, I highly doubt he’s moved
    30 janv. à 0 h 39
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2020
    Messages: 1,576
    Mentions "j'aime": 732
    Quoting: Vancity2196
    Easy pass Canucks.
    Zadorov is untouchable and he's not available.


    That is throwing the word, "untouchable" around to way to easily. Few players, if any in the league (other than players with NMC'c), are truly "untouchable", and Zadorov is certainly not one of them. With that said, I agree that the Canucks turn down this offer.
    30 janv. à 1 h 23
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2022
    Messages: 1,519
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,061
    Canucks decline. They just acquired Zadorov, a player management likes and have had their eyes on for a while. Zadorov has also said he's been loving Vancouver, both the team and the city. Canucks won't trade him after they got him for relatively cheap, especially for an offer that's arguably less than they gave up for him.
    30 janv. à 11 h 24
    #9
    Snowhawk
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2022
    Messages: 2,363
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,365
    Quoting: Canucks123
    why not?
    Nothing 2 lose
    Other than games tears of joy


    Why not?

    Well let’s see, 31 yrs old, playing like crap, no upside to his game.

    The Hawks have enough guys like that which is why they do lose so often, Oilers can keep him.
    30 janv. à 11 h 32
    #10
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 24,044
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,751
    Quoting: Snowhawk18
    So why exactly would the Hawks put in a waiver claim on Janmark?


    Why would Edmonton put Janmark on waivers?
    30 janv. à 11 h 33
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 24,044
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,751
    Quoting: SwarmChair
    Oilers pass. Big Z is overrated.


    It's not like they need another LD.
    30 janv. à 12 h 46
    #12
    Snowhawk
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2022
    Messages: 2,363
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,365
    Quoting: CD282
    Why would Edmonton put Janmark on waivers?


    Ask the person who created this thread and proposed Chicago claim him off waivers from the Oilers.
    30 janv. à 13 h 0
    #13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 24,044
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,751
    Quoting: Snowhawk18
    Why not?

    Well let’s see, 31 yrs old, playing like crap, no upside to his game.

    The Hawks have enough guys like that which is why they do lose so often, Oilers can keep him.


    Quoting: Snowhawk18
    Ask the person who created this thread and proposed Chicago claim him off waivers from the Oilers.

    Clearly you haven't watched much Oilers hockey. Janmark is excellent defensively and a key part of their PK. He won't score much but he certainly isn't "playing like crap".
    30 janv. à 13 h 54
    #14
    Snowhawk
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2022
    Messages: 2,363
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,365
    Quoting: CD282
    Clearly you haven't watched much Oilers hockey. Janmark is excellent defensively and a key part of their PK. He won't score much but he certainly isn't "playing like crap".


    Well comparing him to the guy I saw play for the Hawks a few season, Janmark’s play has dropped off significantly.

    Also, the creator of this thread, who is an Oilers fan is willing to let him go through waivers, so apparently my opinion is shared.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage