SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Think Of the Future

Créé par: BUFF36
Équipe: 2023-24 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 28 janv. 2024
Publié: 28 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
CBJ
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (BUF)
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
2025
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de MIN
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de NSH
2026
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $75 810 236 $0 $5 295 000 $7 689 764 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
7 142 857 $7 142 857 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance650 000 $$650K)
AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
918 333 $918 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
7 100 000 $7 100 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
855 833 $855 833 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance412 500 $$412K)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
837 500 $837 500 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 285 714 $4 285 714 $
DG
UFA - 7
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 333 333 $3 333 333 $
DD
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
28 janv. à 16 h 22
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,182
Mentions "j'aime": 2,873
A first round pick does not get you jiricek lol
Caufield, BUFF36, JacketsComrade and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
28 janv. à 16 h 23
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 3,339
Mentions "j'aime": 2,129
Quoting: SK101
A first round pick does not get you jiricek lol


That pick is most likely top 10, of course it does lol.
28 janv. à 16 h 25
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,182
Mentions "j'aime": 2,873
Quoting: Stadel
That pick is most likely top 10, of course it does lol.


And jiricek was the 6th pick and outplayed his draft spot. He’s a top 3 defenseman prospect in the league lol. Jackets will trade you a first for dahlin since it should be top 10 as well
JacketsComrade et CaseyFlyman a aimé ceci.
28 janv. à 16 h 25
#4
Reinbacher Josi 2.0
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2022
Messages: 4,165
Mentions "j'aime": 2,300
Probably need to add either Savoie or Kulich on top
JacketsComrade et Evey89 a aimé ceci.
28 janv. à 16 h 26
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 5,715
Mentions "j'aime": 4,783
Quoting: SK101
A first round pick does not get you jiricek lol


That pick could be Top 5
28 janv. à 16 h 31
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,182
Mentions "j'aime": 2,873
Quoting: BUFF36
That pick could be Top 5


Yes and jiricek is one of the best prospects in the league. Why would the jackets trade for a draft pick that is less likely to hit? Would you trade benson for the 13th pick this year? Or kulich for the 28th pick?
BUFF36 et CaseyFlyman a aimé ceci.
28 janv. à 16 h 31
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 3,339
Mentions "j'aime": 2,129
Quoting: SK101
And jiricek was the 6th pick and outplayed his draft spot. He’s a top 3 defenseman prospect in the league lol. Jackets will trade you a first for dahlin since it should be top 10 as well



lol neither statement is true. Mintyukov was taken after him and has played much better. Nemec is also better. Mintyukov, hughes, faber even kesserling.

Jiricek has good upside but this idea that hes outplayed his draft status is a stretch.

And comparing him to dahlin is ad absurdum lol
BUFF36 et wojme a aimé ceci.
28 janv. à 16 h 32
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 3,339
Mentions "j'aime": 2,129
Quoting: SK101
Yes and jiricek is one of the best prospects in the league. Why would the jackets trade for a draft pick that is less likely to hit? Would you trade benson for the 13th pick this year? Or kulich for the 28th pick?


Neither benson nor kulich have complained about their playing time. I assume the premise of this trade is jiricek asking out. Otherwise why trade him, as you said.
wojme a aimé ceci.
28 janv. à 16 h 35
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,182
Mentions "j'aime": 2,873
Quoting: Stadel
Neither benson nor kulich have complained about their playing time. I assume the premise of this trade is jiricek asking out. Otherwise why trade him, as you said.


Jackets aren’t trading jiricek though and if he did every team in the league would offer a package for him
28 janv. à 16 h 37
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 3,339
Mentions "j'aime": 2,129
Quoting: SK101
Jackets aren’t trading jiricek though and if he did every team in the league would offer a package for him


Yeah if I had a dollar for every fan base that said this id buy the Sabres lol. If a players asks to be traded the league artificially drives the price down cause they know they can wait out for leverage. Every notable player thats asked out ends up going for 75 cents on the dollar.

The only way Jiricek gets traded is if he requests it. In that scenario hes going for less. Otherwise he's not getting traded.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
28 janv. à 16 h 40
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 5,715
Mentions "j'aime": 4,783
Quoting: SK101
Yes and jiricek is one of the best prospects in the league. Why would the jackets trade for a draft pick that is less likely to hit? Would you trade benson for the 13th pick this year? Or kulich for the 28th pick?


No, but 13th and 28th picks are a lot different than a possible Top 5. And this was made because it doesn't sound like he was very happy about being sent down.
28 janv. à 17 h 12
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 2,082
Mentions "j'aime": 1,749
Quoting: Stadel
The only way Jiricek gets traded is if he requests it. In that scenario hes going for less. Otherwise he's not getting traded.


Even if Jiricek requested a trade, Jarmo would laugh in his face. Then hopefully get fired. Then Jiricek could request a trade to the next GM and get laughed at again.

He's too important based on organizational need to move.
BUFF36 a aimé ceci.
29 janv. à 23 h 48
#13
Its a long E
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 49
Mentions "j'aime": 50
Quoting: Caufield
Probably need to add either Savoie or Kulich on top


Kulich is for sure untouchable but a package containing Savoie is something I would be open to. I would hate to lose Savoie but we are currently severely top heavy on the depth charts and a top tier dman would be such a welcome blessing.

That being said, I can't believe it would be Savoie AND a first. I agree the Sabres need add to the trade to make it work but Jiricek is not several tiers more skilled than Savoie and he has already expressed his displeasure in his current situation which would take a lot of air out of Columbus' leverage (somewhat offset by Buffalo's ridiculous prospect pool).

My offer would be Savoie, a second, and maybe another pick (3rd or later). If that doesn't get it done or at least close, then it isn't worth it to keep negotiating.
BUFF36 et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
30 janv. à 6 h 27
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 5,715
Mentions "j'aime": 4,783
Quoting: Evey89
Kulich is for sure untouchable but a package containing Savoie is something I would be open to. I would hate to lose Savoie but we are currently severely top heavy on the depth charts and a top tier dman would be such a welcome blessing.

That being said, I can't believe it would be Savoie AND a first. I agree the Sabres need add to the trade to make it work but Jiricek is not several tiers more skilled than Savoie and he has already expressed his displeasure in his current situation which would take a lot of air out of Columbus' leverage (somewhat offset by Buffalo's ridiculous prospect pool).

My offer would be Savoie, a second, and maybe another pick (3rd or later). If that doesn't get it done or at least close, then it isn't worth it to keep negotiating.


I agree with what you are saying, but RD are hard to come by, especially one's with his potential so it raises the price.
Evey89 et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
30 janv. à 11 h 32
#15
Its a long E
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 49
Mentions "j'aime": 50
Quoting: BUFF36
I agree with what you are saying, but RD are hard to come by, especially one's with his potential so it raises the price.


Absolutely, the price should absolutely go up. It shouldn't get doubled though. I feel like people are forgetting that Savoie is going to be a top 6 forward. We aren't trading a pittance here. If the price is Savoie and a first, CBJ can take a hike.
BUFF36 a aimé ceci.
30 janv. à 11 h 43
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 5,715
Mentions "j'aime": 4,783
Quoting: Evey89
Absolutely, the price should absolutely go up. It shouldn't get doubled though. I feel like people are forgetting that Savoie is going to be a top 6 forward. We aren't trading a pittance here. If the price is Savoie and a first, CBJ can take a hike.


Sabres are gonna have a hard time fitting all there prospects as is, especially if the extend Mitts. Your getting a piece that can play right know for you. Is it a overpayment, Probably but it doesn't hurt the Sabres either.
Evey89 et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
30 janv. à 11 h 48
#17
Its a long E
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 49
Mentions "j'aime": 50
Quoting: BUFF36
Sabres are gonna have a hard time fitting all there prospects as is, especially if the extend Mitts. Your getting a piece that can play right know for you. Is it a overpayment, Probably but it doesn't hurt the Sabres either.


Honestly, even if it does cost a first, a monumental cost imo, it would still be a net gain for us. Our defense is a bloody sieve. So even though it would be more than I would want to send, yeah, I think I would do it. In fact... I think that feeling proves it's a good deal. Getting something we want for something we don't want to give up? Yeah, that's fair. Alright, you convinced me lol (thought process in real time)
BUFF36 et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
30 janv. à 11 h 59
#18
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 5,715
Mentions "j'aime": 4,783
Quoting: Evey89
Honestly, even if it does cost a first, a monumental cost imo, it would still be a net gain for us. Our defense is a bloody sieve. So even though it would be more than I would want to send, yeah, I think I would do it. In fact... I think that feeling proves it's a good deal. Getting something we want for something we don't want to give up? Yeah, that's fair. Alright, you convinced me lol (thought process in real time)


I don't want to give him up either, but Ostlund is about 2yrs away so it lessons the blow. Never happen but we need help at RD and Adams has the assets to go and get someone. There's some good D in this draft, that Dickinson kid even though he's a LD is something. But we need D for the know to. Adams really should have started this process in the offseason, Johnson and Clifton are just sh!tty bandaids.
Evey89 et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage