SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Pure Rental Trade Assessment

Créé par: earl08
Équipe: 2023-24 Avalanche du Colorado
Date de création initiale: 26 janv. 2024
Publié: 26 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Pls comment with your respectable & constructive comments, like you always do. My thought with Byram is he's on a relatively cheap deal this season AND next, so CMac should take advantage of a strong starting D core while feasible under the cap & without having to trade anyone else away to make room. He can still flip Byram for a 2C Summer 2025 and will have extracted the maximum value out of the cap situation by doing so. The high rental price ensures COL outbids any other team (WPG) for Lindholm's services, & to reward MacK for his hard fitness work, playing mega minutes & hodling up the team bus every night :D

Its two 1sts, a 2nd, a & a RyJo cap dump for Lindholm
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
1775 000 $
Transactions
COL
  1. Lindholm, Elias
Détails additionnels:
EL is a pure rental, mercenary; no shame in that. Avs need the 1st to deal for a stop-gap 2C this summer. These are the Avs' three top prospects. Keeping Byram while on a cheap contract maximizes his value before he can demand a bigger AAV. This is a high price to pay for a rental but fortunately for COL these players fit CGY's needs while still leaving the Avs contending window open. Yes, they kick the 2C solution down the road, but thankfully the NHL allocates them additional draft picks each new year to help with this problem.
CGY
  1. Behrens, Sean [Liste de réserve]
  2. Gulyayev, Mikhail [Liste de réserve]
  3. Johansen, Ryan
  4. Ritchie, Calum [Liste de réserve]
  5. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (COL)
Détails additionnels:
Behrens fills a starting Dman spot as soon as this spring. As CGY might lose half its D core from start of 23-24 season, this fits an immediate need. MG is the long term, high ceiling D prospect; he'll take a few more years to ripen, but is already performing well at the KHL level this season as a younger player. CR is a solid top six C prospect that is 2-3 yrs away from a starting role; he's so far successfully navigated a shoulder injury in his draft eligible year to remain a top CHL prospect that is back on track to the NHL. The 3rd is to pls take RyJo for cap purposes, namaste.
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de SEA
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
2025
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
2026
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $82 771 250 $637 500 $0 $728 750 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
12 600 000 $12 600 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
AD, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
825 000 $825 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
775 000 $775 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
825 000 $825 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
896 250 $896 250 $
AD
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
775 000 $775 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
987 500 $987 500 $
DG/DD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
775 000 $775 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
775 000 $775 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
850 000 $850 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
775 000 $775 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
775 000 $775 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
Is Elias Lindholm worth Martin St Louis value?
Le graphique a été masqué

Options de sondage


26 janv. à 13 h 33
#1
Tank it baby
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 6,201
Mentions "j'aime": 4,246
Well thought out argument.

I don't know if Calgary does this or not.

But you certainly presented a valid case. 😁

I'd love to see Lindholm as 2C on Colorado. 🙂
earl08 a aimé ceci.
26 janv. à 13 h 36
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 3,584
Mentions "j'aime": 3,444
This is an easy no for Colorado. Both Ritchie and Gulyayev have increased their value since being drafted. They're looking very good and are more valuable than any first the team holds.
MeetYourMakar et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
26 janv. à 13 h 37
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 967
Mentions "j'aime": 363
With Calgary having the ability to they should be retaining on Lindholm, Tanev, Hanifin, I don't think that means they will because for whatever reason Flames ownership is find paying Sutter 4M a year not to coach here but not eating a fraction of a salary for 3 months.

If that were the case I would be shocked if Conroy couldn't get a 1st in any deal for any of the above mentioned guys.

Ritchie OR Behrans + Johanson + 1st for Lindholm @ 2.45M

At his full cap hit, Johanson + Ritchie OR Behrans + a pick.

Everything you said here is a good thought.
Anus_McLeod a aimé ceci.
26 janv. à 13 h 38
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 967
Mentions "j'aime": 363
Quoting: WranglerWranglin
With Calgary having the ability to they should be retaining on Lindholm, Tanev, Hanifin, I don't think that means they will because for whatever reason Flames ownership is find paying Sutter 4M a year not to coach here but not eating a fraction of a salary for 3 months.

If that were the case I would be shocked if Conroy couldn't get a 1st in any deal for any of the above mentioned guys.

Ritchie OR Behrans + Johanson + 1st for Lindholm 2.45M

At his full cap hit, Johanson + Ritchie OR Behrans + a pick.


My bad. Doubled up
earl08 a aimé ceci.
26 janv. à 13 h 43
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 3,762
Mentions "j'aime": 972
Quoting: WranglerWranglin
My bad. Doubled up


Cocaine is a helluva drug
26 janv. à 13 h 43
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 3,584
Mentions "j'aime": 3,444
Quoting: WranglerWranglin
With Calgary having the ability to they should be retaining on Lindholm, Tanev, Hanifin, I don't think that means they will because for whatever reason Flames ownership is find paying Sutter 4M a year not to coach here but not eating a fraction of a salary for 3 months.

If that were the case I would be shocked if Conroy couldn't get a 1st in any deal for any of the above mentioned guys.

Ritchie OR Behrans + Johanson + 1st for Lindholm 2.45M

At his full cap hit, Johanson + Ritchie OR Behrans + a pick.

Everything you said here is a good thought.


While I obviously don't know for sure what the team is thinking, I'm pretty confident that Ritchie is off the table for any rental (even Lindholm). A 1st + Behrens + Johansen is doable though. No retention necessary, but will take it if offered.
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
26 janv. à 13 h 48
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 967
Mentions "j'aime": 363
Quoting: Anus_McLeod
While I obviously don't know for sure what the team is thinking, I'm pretty confident that Ritchie is off the table for any rental (even Lindholm). A 1st + Behrens + Johansen is doable though. No retention necessary, but will take it if offered.


If the Flames are gutting their defence as expected I would be disappointed if Behrens, Johanson and a 1st were on the table and Conroy didn't take it, I like the framework of that deal a lot. Ritchie is a stud and likely a pipe dream without Calgary adding in the deal.
Anus_McLeod et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
26 janv. à 13 h 58
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,572
Mentions "j'aime": 4,573
Such an easy no for the Avs. '24 1st plus one of Behrens/Olausson/Gulyayev plus RyJo is as much as the Avs should be paying and even then I'm not sure it's worth it.
BruinsCharlies a aimé ceci.
26 janv. à 14 h 8
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 74
Mentions "j'aime": 42
I think your reasoning makes sense. However, the trade for Colorado does not. I'd like lindholm. But Ritchie and Gulyayev are the avs best prospects by a mile. Without them, that cupboard is pretty bare. I think Ritchie is already projected to be the 2C of the future. I think prospects the avs would be more likely to give up would be behrens, and Olausson. Maybe not the most value on those two. But I'd imagine they are the only ones the Avs would be willing to give up.
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
26 janv. à 14 h 21
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 486
Mentions "j'aime": 527
Its two 1sts, a 2nd, a & a RyJo cap dump for 35-50 games of Lindholm*

*corrected
26 janv. à 15 h 0
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,572
Mentions "j'aime": 4,573
Quoting: Android_H_Jones
Its two 1sts, a 2nd, a & a RyJo cap dump for 35-50 games of Lindholm*

*corrected


Two firsts (Gulyayev & Ritchie), a second (Behrens), a THIRD, and a 'RyJo cap dump' for 35-50 games of Lindholm......it gets worse the more you look at it.
26 janv. à 15 h 52
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 1,944
Mentions "j'aime": 780
Quoting: TJTwolf
Two firsts (Gulyayev & Ritchie), a second (Behrens), a THIRD, and a 'RyJo cap dump' for 35-50 games of Lindholm......it gets worse the more you look at it.


You can’t value a guy as worth a 1st round pick just because he was drafted in the 1st round.. neither Gulyayev or Ritchie are worth a 1st round pick.

After a player is drafted, his draft round is irrelevant.
26 janv. à 15 h 52
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 1,944
Mentions "j'aime": 780
Feel like Colorado would just be smarter to spend 2 1sts and go get Boone Jenner from Columbus and roll with the guy under contract for longer and cheaper
earl08 a aimé ceci.
26 janv. à 19 h 41
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 1,333
Mentions "j'aime": 404
Quoting: Ryminister_92
Feel like Colorado would just be smarter to spend 2 1sts and go get Boone Jenner from Columbus and roll with the guy under contract for longer and cheaper



Exactly idk about 2 1st but def a 1st and 2nd and 2 prospects I say
26 janv. à 20 h 23
#15
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 3,762
Mentions "j'aime": 972
Quoting: Ryminister_92
You can’t value a guy as worth a 1st round pick just because he was drafted in the 1st round.. neither Gulyayev or Ritchie are worth a 1st round pick.

After a player is drafted, his draft round is irrelevant.


Before the injury, services had Ritchie ranked in the top 10. The Avs took a value gamble on him playing through it and have seemed to win so far. So, to further your argument, Ritchie is outperforming his draft slot
26 janv. à 20 h 28
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 3,762
Mentions "j'aime": 972
Quoting: Ryminister_92
Feel like Colorado would just be smarter to spend 2 1sts and go get Boone Jenner from Columbus and roll with the guy under contract for longer and cheaper


Maybe, and I've made a Jenner roster, but there are pitfalls to him as well. Lindholm is simply better than Jenner and that's what this roster focuses on.
26 janv. à 20 h 30
#17
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 3,762
Mentions "j'aime": 972
Quoting: TJTwolf
Two firsts (Gulyayev & Ritchie), a second (Behrens), a THIRD, and a 'RyJo cap dump' for 35-50 games of Lindholm......it gets worse the more you look at it.


If the Avs were guaranteed to win the Cup, it wouldn't matter. Or, as Eric Lacroix said: "what would you be willing to do if you knew you were guaranteed to win?"
26 janv. à 20 h 31
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,572
Mentions "j'aime": 4,573
Quoting: earl08
If the Avs were guaranteed to win the Cup, it wouldn't matter


Except they won't be so it does.
26 janv. à 20 h 35
#19
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 3,762
Mentions "j'aime": 972
Quoting: TJTwolf
Except they won't be so it does.


If I'm being forced to cheer for Zach Parise, then I want Lindholm, lol.
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Chargement de l'animation
Soumettre les modifications du sondage