Quoting: WN88
1. Bertuzzi, Keefe, and anyone that watches hockey knows what his role is. Not sure where the TOI stat is from, but I'd have to assume that it's largely due to him not being on pp1, which is understandable considering we've had a top 5 pp for like 5 years now.
2. Liljegren had an incredible 1st half last year. The only reason he didn't see his role increase in the 2nd half is because he straight-up wasn't good. He lost his spot to Holl, and for good reason. He's also rarely thrived whenever given the chance to play in a bigger role. The way he played earlier tonight against the Canucks is a big example as to why he hasn't yet totally earned the trust of Keefe to be thrown into top-pairing minutes.
3. That third line is NOT good. Our third line hasn't been good all year. That's largely due to Max Domi. The bottom line is that Robertson, although skilled, isn't suitable for that role. There literally isn't a fit for him on this team. He just isn't a good fit with Domi. Their inability to play defense is just way too risky.
4. No idea why you're so obsessed with connor timmins. He's so mid.
5. Uhhhhhh... so you want to take away Bertuzzi from the front of the net on the PP? Talk about contradicting your first point lmaoo.
1. I never said take Bert off the PP. My suggestion is to add Gregor to one of the units. Traffic in front matters.
2. Liligren: so he goes into a slump and you decrease his role or bench him? As a young player, this does nothing for his confidence. You have to let him.play through it; more one on one coaching, talk to the kid. He is obviously part.of the big picture, so you play him as such.
3. The Robertson-Domi-Jarnkrok unit was actually surprising good. It produced. It could drive play o some level. Defensively not a fan, but when these are the puzzle pieces you are given, and they fit on some.level, you go with it. (I will note I don't see Robertson as a long term fit, but, where he could have been a viable trade chip to balance that line, his constant benching tanks his value again).
4. Not obsessed with Timmins. But, he is a solid 2-way defender who can produce offensively the back end. He is only 24. Room to grow. And when Giordano and Brodie are looking Ling in the tooth, playing Timmins to manage workload between the vets makes sense. Keeps them fresher. Not overplayed. Allows Timmins game to grow if it will. (Note: like Roberston, I no longer see Timmins in Toronto long term. His skill set isn't what the team needs. And like Robertson, his constant benching detracts from any value he has).
I will add, out side of the Benoit signing (and I loved it), the UFA signings I hated. Bertuzzi was the type if player needed, not at $5.5 million. Domi at $3 million wasa head scratcher on many levels. Only way I felt itmade any sense is if he was reunited with Marner tonsee if they could recapture their London chemistry (and we are yet to see it). Klingberg made me vomit.
These additions (outside of Klingberg, as it was just so stupid) gave Keefe line up flexibility I simply don't see him using. Only defense (pun intended) Keefe has is Van Ryn's defensive systems have proven terrible - and a guy I don't see back next year.... but as a coach, you would recognize it and maybe reassign Van Ryn.
Every coach has a shelf life. I think Keefe's is up.