SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

This is the trade to make

Créé par: Jets12Kozy
Équipe: 2023-24 Jets de Winnipeg
Date de création initiale: 14 janv. 2024
Publié: 14 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Tried to make an interesting offer for Calgary without giving up McGroarty, Barlow, Lambo, Salomonsson.
Great 2 way C in Lindholm is great for perfetti/Ehlers fits one need.

Gritty hard working Tanev who can log big minutes along Jmo and of course is a right ****.

Needs are met just need to work out the trade details
Transactions
WPG
  1. Lindholm, Elias (2 425 000 $ retained)
  2. Tanev, Christopher (1 500 000 $ retained)
CGY
  1. Appleton, Mason
  2. Lucius, Chaz
  3. Rashevsky, Dmitri [Liste de réserve]
  4. Stanley, Logan
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (WPG)
  6. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (WPG)
  7. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (WPG)
Détails additionnels:
Conditional 2025 2nd becomes 2025 1st if Winnipeg makes the Stanley Cup Final
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de MTL
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
2025
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
2026
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $79 929 524 $0 $1 275 000 $3 570 476 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
7 142 857 $7 142 857 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 437 500 $3 437 500 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
-375 000 $-375 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 166 667 $6 166 667 $
G
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
5 950 000 $5 950 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
775 000 $775 000 $
AG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 janv. à 11 h 47
#1
Wpgman
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,072
Mentions "j'aime": 452
Tanev not needed especially how the d is playing right now. Lindholm would be an upgrade at 2C. Way better option than Monahan who is really not an upgrade.
Jets12Kozy, Windjammer, CanMerc and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
14 janv. à 11 h 50
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,842
Mentions "j'aime": 2,515
i would be ok with offering barlow for lindholm even, especially with an extension in place.

Now that i think about it they wont really be able to afford him next year...
Jets12Kozy et SomeonesOffended a aimé ceci.
14 janv. à 11 h 50
#3
Démarrer sujet
KFC
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 1,842
Mentions "j'aime": 497
Modifié 14 janv. à 11 h 57
Quoting: Wpgman
Tanev not needed especially how the d is playing right now. Lindholm would be an upgrade at 2C. Way better option than Monahan who is really not an upgrade.


0 interest in Monahan especially at the prices speculated they want for him lol yikes

And I disagree I think we need a big playoff style defender like tanev in the top 4, id be quite concerned about a top d pairing of Jmo and Demelo getting bullied in the corners and front of the net come playoffs. Our defensive play has been by commission of all 6 players in the ice not necessarily defense specifically, this is our year before cap is going to force some decisions. Go all in!
SomeonesOffended a aimé ceci.
14 janv. à 11 h 51
#4
Démarrer sujet
KFC
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 1,842
Mentions "j'aime": 497
Quoting: drambui
i would be ok with offering barlow for lindholm even, especially with an extension in place.


If it's an extension yeah id consider Lambo/Barlow but with demelo, Dillon perfetti needing deals next summer, as well as Lindholm being a ufa I don't see an extension as very likely
SomeonesOffended a aimé ceci.
14 janv. à 11 h 54
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,842
Mentions "j'aime": 2,515
Quoting: Jets12Kozy
If it's an extension yeah id consider Lambo/Barlow but with demelo, Dillon perfetti needing deals next summer, as well as Lindholm being a ufa I don't see an extension as very likely


Yeah i agree, i edited my response probably before you replied. Money is gonna be thigh next year, lots of ufa, schmidt will have to be moved too probably.
Jets12Kozy et SomeonesOffended a aimé ceci.
14 janv. à 11 h 55
#6
Démarrer sujet
KFC
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 1,842
Mentions "j'aime": 497
Quoting: drambui
Yeah i agree, i edited my response probably before you replied. Money is gonna be thigh next year, lots of ufa, schmidt will have to be moved too probably.


Yeah Schmidt likely gone at the draft or summer, id move him for cap space this year but he's potentially really important for the locker room so keep him around for this run I think
drambui, CanMerc et SomeonesOffended a aimé ceci.
14 janv. à 12 h 8
#7
Wpgman
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,072
Mentions "j'aime": 452
Quoting: Jets12Kozy
Yeah Schmidt likely gone at the draft or summer, id move him for cap space this year but he's potentially really important for the locker room so keep him around for this run I think


Schmidt besides his cap is playing solid enough for this year. Unless an offer comes in before TDL that involves him(highly unlikely), he will be bought out in the offseason- business decision just like Wheeler.
14 janv. à 12 h 15
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2023
Messages: 543
Mentions "j'aime": 428
Modifié 14 janv. à 12 h 21
Way too much going to CGY
Jets don’t need Tanev, they need Lindholm

Quoting: drambui
i would be ok with offering barlow for lindholm even, especially with an extension in place.

Now that i think about it they wont really be able to afford him next year...

Quoting: Jets12Kozy
If it's an extension yeah id consider Lambo/Barlow but with demelo, Dillon perfetti needing deals next summer, as well as Lindholm being a ufa I don't see an extension as very likely

Only way I offer Barlow is if there’s an extension in place…Lambert is untouchable for me… I wouldn’t trade him at all.
Dillon can walk, we have Chisholm to fill the bottom pairing LD. Schmidt needs to go in the offseason for cap space as well as Iafello…and for me either Namestnikov or Appleton can be moved too.
Add all that to the Cap increase next year and the Jets can absolutely afford Lindholm with an extension.

Connor - Scheifele - Vilardi
Perfetti - Lindholm - Ehlers
Neidereitter - Lowry - Lambert
Barron - Gus/Kupari - ???

Morrissey - DeMelo
Samberg - Pionk
Chisholm - ???

Try to get Barron out of MTL to play on the RHD and fill that bottom line RW slot with depth or acquire through trade or FA.
Jets12Kozy et SomeonesOffended a aimé ceci.
14 janv. à 12 h 22
#9
Démarrer sujet
KFC
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 1,842
Mentions "j'aime": 497
Quoting: CanMerc
Way too much going to CGY
Jets don’t need Tanev, they need Lindholm



Only way I offer Barlow is if there’s an extension in place…Lambert is untouchable for me… I wouldn’t trade him at all.
Dillon can walk, we have Chisholm to fill the bottom pairing LD. Schmidt needs to go in the offseason for cap space as well as Iafello…and for me either Namestnikov or Appleton can be moved too.
Add all that to the Cap increase next year and the Jets can absolutely afford Lindholm with an extension.

Connor - Scheifele - Vilardi
Perfetti - Lindholm - Ehlers
Neidereitter - Lowry - Lambert
Barron - Gus/Kupari - ???

Morrissey - DeMelo
Samberg - Pionk
Chisholm - ???

Try to get Barron out of MTL to play on the RHD and fill that bottom line RW slot with depth or acquire through trade or FA


Disagree on Jets not needing Tanev he is a perfect fit for what we need on D
Quoting: Jets12Kozy


And I disagree I think we need a big playoff style defender like tanev in the top 4, id be quite concerned about a top d pairing of Jmo and Demelo getting bullied in the corners and front of the net come playoffs. Our defensive play has been by commission of all 6 players in the ice not necessarily defense specifically, this is our year before cap is going to force some decisions. Go all in!
SomeonesOffended a aimé ceci.
14 janv. à 12 h 26
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2023
Messages: 543
Mentions "j'aime": 428
Quoting: Jets12Kozy
Disagree on Jets not needing Tanev he is a perfect fit for what we need on D


Lindholm is the bigger need and where we should be putting money first… after that, then we need to address the RD, but Tanev is going to want to get payed on his next contract and he’s not what we need, to be paying what he’ll want.
If we were moving on from Pionk, then yes, I’d agree with you, but not if Pionk is staying.
For me, we need a Pulock
SomeonesOffended a aimé ceci.
14 janv. à 12 h 31
#11
Démarrer sujet
KFC
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 1,842
Mentions "j'aime": 497
Quoting: CanMerc
Lindholm is the bigger need and where we should be putting money first… after that, then we need to address the RD, but Tanev is going to want to get payed on his next contract and he’s not what we need, to be paying what he’ll want.
If we were moving on from Pionk, then yes, I’d agree with you, but not if Pionk is staying.
For me, we need a Pulock


Pulock will cost a ton having just extended and having a bit of a down year, and if we can get Tanev as a rental in the Lindholm deal for not a crazy amount more it's a no brainer he's really a perfect playoff defender in my opinion
SomeonesOffended a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage