SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Jets need Lindholm

Créé par: Howie
Équipe: 2023-24 Jets de Winnipeg
Date de création initiale: 8 janv. 2024
Publié: 8 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I'd love to see these lines come playoffs tbh

Swap perfetti connor and vilardi ehlers if needed but I'd only switch one of them tbh
Transactions
CGY
  1. Torgersson, Daniel
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (WPG)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (WPG)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de MTL
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
2025
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
2026
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $84 807 858 $0 $850 000 $-1 307 858 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
7 142 857 $7 142 857 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 437 500 $3 437 500 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
2 166 667 $2 166 667 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AG, AD
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 166 667 $6 166 667 $
G
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
5 950 000 $5 950 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
775 000 $775 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
8 janv. à 21 h 46
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 3,789
Mentions "j'aime": 1,208
Jets will pass on this trade.
No thanks.
Jets are a better team without Lindholm.
8 janv. à 21 h 48
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 4,052
Mentions "j'aime": 1,451
Quoting: Vancity2196
Jets will pass on this trade.
No thanks.
Jets are a better team without Lindholm.


Jets need a better pp, pk and face man which lindholm brings all 3 while being a legit threat down the middle after scheifele and move namestnikov and lowry to lower lines would make the jets super deep. They are 1st in the nhl time is now to ensure the year isn't a waste
8 janv. à 21 h 49
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 999
Mentions "j'aime": 395
Still dont know if I would pay that for a rental. It would make us better for sure but I think there are other players out there with multiple years that can be had for a similar price that can be a better fit. Dont know if Lindholm is the best fit for the Jets on the ice or contract-wise. 2C is probably the biggest hole on paper but Namestnikov is filling in very well in that spot. I would look more to the backend if there is a big name out there that fits this 2-3 year window that the jets have.
8 janv. à 21 h 52
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 4,052
Mentions "j'aime": 1,451
Quoting: njlaforte
Still dont know if I would pay that for a rental. It would make us better for sure but I think there are other players out there with multiple years that can be had for a similar price that can be a better fit. Dont know if Lindholm is the best fit for the Jets on the ice or contract-wise. 2C is probably the biggest hole on paper but Namestnikov is filling in very well in that spot. I would look more to the backend if there is a big name out there that fits this 2-3 year window that the jets have.


There is no dman that would be available that is an impact player for less than what I paid for lindholm. Term means the cost is more as it's not a rental at that point. The team defense has been amazing and really doesn't need to be changed. Addressing special teams is top priority (pp, pk and faceoffs) lindholm brings all of them. The dmen are fine as you aren't moving 5 of them only one is schmidt and paying the price for say (rasmus Andersson) is not cheap and not a chevy trade tbh and paying to get rid of schmidt when he's been a beast defensively
8 janv. à 21 h 53
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 999
Mentions "j'aime": 395
Quoting: Howie
Jets need a better pp, pk and face man which lindholm brings all 3 while being a legit threat down the middle after scheifele and move namestnikov and lowry to lower lines would make the jets super deep. They are 1st in the nhl time is now to ensure the year isn't a waste


I agree however I think the assets can be better spent on a player with term. Lindholm is the flashy player this TDL but the Jets have a window of 2-3 years where they could use a big name on D or a C with term. Lindholm as a rental isnt worth a 1st 2nd and C prospect. The only issue is there will be a team that wants to trade and extend him.
palhal a aimé ceci.
8 janv. à 21 h 57
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 999
Mentions "j'aime": 395
Quoting: Howie
There is no dman that would be available that is an impact player for less than what I paid for lindholm. Term means the cost is more as it's not a rental at that point. The team defense has been amazing and really doesn't need to be changed. Addressing special teams is top priority (pp, pk and faceoffs) lindholm brings all of them. The dmen are fine as you aren't moving 5 of them only one is schmidt and paying the price for say (rasmus Andersson) is not cheap and not a chevy trade tbh and paying to get rid of schmidt when he's been a beast defensively


I agree that the special teams is the only issue right now however I believe that will work itself out. Connor coming back will also give that a boost.

My opinion on faceoffs has always been that they aren't that important.

I just feel like that price for Lindholm is ok but only if you are extending him which is impossible for the Jets and tbh is probably not the best idea.
8 janv. à 21 h 57
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 4,052
Mentions "j'aime": 1,451
Quoting: njlaforte
I agree however I think the assets can be better spent on a player with term. Lindholm is the flashy player this TDL but the Jets have a window of 2-3 years where they could use a big name on D or a C with term. Lindholm as a rental isnt worth a 1st 2nd and C prospect. The only issue is there will be a team that wants to trade and extend him.


Jets paid a 1st for Stastny in the past it's a similar position. What if Schiefele gets injured in playoffs would you rather have namestnikov as your 1c or lindholm. Sure the price is high but the jets are in a position where they can go for it this year and still have a good team into the future. They could trade his rights like Hayes and players with term being a top 4 dman or 2c will cost more than this and do we really need the term with how lambert mcgroarty and chibrikov are playing? They look like they could make the team next year if not the year after
8 janv. à 21 h 57
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,602
Mentions "j'aime": 19,716
Quoting: Howie
Jets need a better pp, pk and face man which lindholm brings all 3 while being a legit threat down the middle after scheifele and move namestnikov and lowry to lower lines would make the jets super deep. They are 1st in the nhl time is now to ensure the year isn't a waste


Vancity is a troll.

A deal for Lindholm starts with Lucius/Lambert + 1st
Dr_Invictus a aimé ceci.
8 janv. à 21 h 57
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 4,052
Mentions "j'aime": 1,451
Quoting: njlaforte
I agree that the special teams is the only issue right now however I believe that will work itself out. Connor coming back will also give that a boost.

My opinion on faceoffs has always been that they aren't that important.

I just feel like that price for Lindholm is ok but only if you are extending him which is impossible for the Jets and tbh is probably not the best idea.


Don't have to extend him with the prospects we have coming up lambert 2c in no time
8 janv. à 21 h 59
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 4,052
Mentions "j'aime": 1,451
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Vancity is a troll.

A deal for Lindholm starts with Lucius/Lambert + 1st


Not getting lambert and lucius tbh that's why I included a 2nd and b/c prospect to compensate for no lucius. Lindholm ain't worth 2+ firsts rn 25 points in 40 games heck Kadri has more lol
8 janv. à 22 h 2
#11
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,855
Mentions "j'aime": 22,863
Jets are # 1 overall in the league. Need Lindholm?? No. He might be nice addition. But for that price maybe the Jets could do better. Lindholm is 2nd centre.
8 janv. à 22 h 4
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 3,789
Mentions "j'aime": 1,208
Quoting: Howie
Jets need a better pp, pk and face man which lindholm brings all 3 while being a legit threat down the middle after scheifele and move namestnikov and lowry to lower lines would make the jets super deep. They are 1st in the nhl time is now to ensure the year isn't a waste


But where does Connor fit if Jets get Lindholm, for example?
8 janv. à 22 h 8
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 4,052
Mentions "j'aime": 1,451
Quoting: palhal
Jets are # 1 overall in the league. Need Lindholm?? No. He might be nice addition. But for that price maybe the Jets could do better. Lindholm is 2nd centre.


Exactly and having top 6 capable players will be needed. Aa much as namestnikov is great moving him to 3rd line would be ideal for a run. Seems to me most jets fans just believe in the team bc we're doing good and don't want to address that we do actually need to improve and lindholm makes the biggest impact on what we need so why not?
8 janv. à 22 h 8
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 4,052
Mentions "j'aime": 1,451
Quoting: Vancity2196
But where does Connor fit if Jets get Lindholm, for example?


Did you not look at the lines whatsoever? He can play top line or 2nd line. With Lindholm Jets basically have 2 1st lines. If you mean long term we don't have to resign him and can trade his ufa rights as well.
8 janv. à 22 h 26
#15
Benzino204
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,653
Mentions "j'aime": 696
We'll see at the deadline if Lindholm a) doesn't sign in Calgary, and b) if the Jets need an injection in the lineup.

Calgary can get more than that for Lindholm.

I'm in the minority here it seems, but the Jets can absolutely go big on a rental.

Winnipeg has Lucius, McGroarty, Chibrikov, Salomonsson, Lambert, and Barlow coming up. The prospect pool is good, and deep enough to sacrifice one of those guys for a rental the caliber of Lindholm. His two way ability would be beloved by Bones.

Of those prospects, my choice to go is Lucius, but this is the time to go all in and make that sacrifice for the Cup.
8 janv. à 22 h 34
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 4,052
Mentions "j'aime": 1,451
Quoting: Benzino204
We'll see at the deadline if Lindholm a) doesn't sign in Calgary, and b) if the Jets need an injection in the lineup.

Calgary can get more than that for Lindholm.

I'm in the minority here it seems, but the Jets can absolutely go big on a rental.

Winnipeg has Lucius, McGroarty, Chibrikov, Salomonsson, Lambert, and Barlow coming up. The prospect pool is good, and deep enough to sacrifice one of those guys for a rental the caliber of Lindholm. His two way ability would be beloved by Bones.

Of those prospects, my choice to go is Lucius, but this is the time to go all in and make that sacrifice for the Cup.


If we can get Lindholm for a 1st 2nd and a prospect not one of main ones (McGroarty, Barlow, Lambert, Lucius, chibrikov) I'd do this deal swapping heinola in tbh. To get lindholm without the major prospect would be a massive win. Ik term would be nice but perfetti needs a deal ehlers and connor are coming up and dmen as well. I'd say a rental is better bc if he doesn't fit we don't have issue and if he is we're winning games can try and get him on a 2-3 year deal in the 7m range or trade his right or just move on.
Benzino204 a aimé ceci.
8 janv. à 22 h 51
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,602
Mentions "j'aime": 19,716
Quoting: Howie
Not getting lambert and lucius tbh that's why I included a 2nd and b/c prospect to compensate for no lucius. Lindholm ain't worth 2+ firsts rn 25 points in 40 games heck Kadri has more lol


Then you probably aren't getting him over Colorado
8 janv. à 23 h 20
#18
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 4,052
Mentions "j'aime": 1,451
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Then you probably aren't getting him over Colorado


Colorado ain't offering more than 1st, 2nd and heinola bro also Colorado has less prospects and needs to keep their 1st
8 janv. à 23 h 35
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,602
Mentions "j'aime": 19,716
Quoting: Howie
Colorado ain't offering more than 1st, 2nd and heinola bro also Colorado has less prospects and needs to keep their 1st


You didn't even offer a 1st, 2nd and Heinola lol. What are you talking about? You offered Torgersson who is a C/D level prospect at best.
8 janv. à 23 h 36
#20
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 4,052
Mentions "j'aime": 1,451
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
You didn't even offer a 1st, 2nd and Heinola lol. What are you talking about? You offered Torgersson who is a C/D level prospect at best.


If you actually looked at the discussion you see that if this isn't enough I'd swap torgersson for heinola
8 janv. à 23 h 43
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,602
Mentions "j'aime": 19,716
Quoting: Howie
If you actually looked at the discussion you see that if this isn't enough I'd swap torgersson for heinola


That discussion wasn't with me at all. The website autoscrolls to the post I was quoted in, expecting me to scroll back up and read through your conversation with someone else is kinda silly.

I responded to the trade saying it was light and that Calgary would want one of your space centers + late 1st. You said they are unavailable and then complained about his production playing with 3rd liners most of the season. I responded with how you probably won't get him the. Because Colorado will offer more. Thats it
8 janv. à 23 h 46
#22
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 4,052
Mentions "j'aime": 1,451
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
That discussion wasn't with me at all. The website autoscrolls to the post I was quoted in, expecting me to scroll back up and read through your conversation with someone else is kinda silly.

I responded to the trade saying it was light and that Calgary would want one of your space centers + late 1st. You said they are unavailable and then complained about his production playing with 3rd liners most of the season. I responded with how you probably won't get him the. Because Colorado will offer more. Thats it


What is Colorado even going to offer beyond a 1st. Big note jets don't need to send cap back in the deal which ryan jo gets sent in literally every offer which is unrealistic
8 janv. à 23 h 51
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,602
Mentions "j'aime": 19,716
Quoting: Howie
What is Colorado even going to offer beyond a 1st. Big note jets don't need to send cap back in the deal which ryan jo gets sent in literally every offer which is unrealistic


There are reports Byram could be made available. That or 1st + Ritchie.

Whether you like it or not Lindholm is the top forward asset on the market with a very cheap contract and no team control. Lots of teams will be interested and there will be a bidding war
8 janv. à 23 h 55
#24
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 4,052
Mentions "j'aime": 1,451
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
There are reports Byram could be made available. That or 1st + Ritchie.

Whether you like it or not Lindholm is the top forward asset on the market with a very cheap contract and no team control. Lots of teams will be interested and there will be a bidding war


I've heard Richie isn't the forward its Oskar Olausson so that's a late 1st an a player doing about how good torgersson did last year. Jets beat that offer
8 janv. à 23 h 57
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,602
Mentions "j'aime": 19,716
Quoting: Howie
I've heard Richie isn't the forward its Oskar Olausson so that's a late 1st an a player doing about how good torgersson did last year. Jets beat that offer


From who? Fans? OO sucks so he probably won't be nearly enough. Hell Boston outbids if thats the best prospect being offered
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage