SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

In Mike Grier We Trust

Créé par: sensonfire
Équipe: 2024-25 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 4 janv. 2024
Publié: 4 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3950 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
13 000 000 $
11 100 000 $
1875 000 $
2775 000 $
2775 000 $
2775 000 $
2775 000 $
2775 000 $
2775 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
22 250 000 $
2775 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Celebrini, Macklin
3950 000 $
Jiricek, Adam
3950 000 $
Iginla, Tij
3950 000 $
Emery, EJ
3950 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2025 (SJS)
FLA
    Anthony Duclair and 50% retention at the 2024 Trade Deadline
    2.
    SJS
    1. Schmidt, Nate
    2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (WPG)
    WPG
    1. Granlund, Mikael
    Détails additionnels:
    Trade made at the 2024 Trade Deadline
    3.
    SJS
    1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (NJD)
    NJD
    1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (NJD)
    Détails additionnels:
    New Jersey makes the 2024 Eastern Conference Finals
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Enfoui
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2024
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de WPG
    Logo de NJD
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de NJD
    2025
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de WPG
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de WSH
    2026
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2387 500 000 $61 375 000 $0 $850 000 $26 125 000 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    AG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
    AD
    RFA - 1
    Celebrini, Macklin
    950 000 $950 000 $
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    950 000 $950 000 $
    C
    RFA
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
    AD, AG
    RFA
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    AD, C
    RFA
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    775 000 $775 000 $
    AG, C
    RFA
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    775 000 $775 000 $
    AD, C
    RFA
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    875 000 $875 000 $
    DD
    RFA
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 350 000 $2 350 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    775 000 $775 000 $
    DG
    RFA
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    775 000 $775 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
    5 950 000 $5 950 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    775 000 $775 000 $
    DG
    RFA
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    775 000 $775 000 $
    C, AG
    RFA

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    4 janv. à 10 h 27
    #1
    Tank it baby
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2020
    Messages: 6,471
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,428
    For that price we might as well just keep Duclair.
    sensonfire a aimé ceci.
    4 janv. à 10 h 35
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2020
    Messages: 15,997
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,111
    Granlund isn't an improvement on Namestnikov and didn't fill a need for the jets.
    RationalHockeyFan a aimé ceci.
    4 janv. à 10 h 54
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2017
    Messages: 115
    Mentions "j'aime": 46
    i'm failing to see the point in that NJ trade
    4 janv. à 12 h 33
    #4
    Démarrer sujet
    sensonfire
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2021
    Messages: 11,920
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,469
    Quoting: holtzer
    i'm failing to see the point in that NJ trade


    That's because it's not a trade.

    If the Devils reach the 2024 ECF, they owe the Sharks a 1st round pick because of the Timo Meier deal.

    It's not that hard to figure out.
    4 janv. à 12 h 54
    #5
    Démarrer sujet
    sensonfire
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2021
    Messages: 11,920
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,469
    Quoting: Windjammer
    Granlund isn't an improvement on Namestnikov and didn't fill a need for the jets.


    1. Granlund is a bonafide #2 centre with term.

    2. Granlund is 50% on faceoffs playing for the Sharks while Namestnikov is 37% on faceoffs playing for the Jets.

    3. Granlund has 25 points in 31 games playing for the Sharks while Namestnikov has 20 points in 33 games playing for the jets.

    4. The Jets dump Schmidt and gain 950K in cap space for the next two seasons.

    5. The only thing of value the Jets give up is a late 1st.



    6. You trash every trade in AGM that involves the Jets, regardless of how good it is for the Jets.

    7. Your feedback is worthless.
    4 janv. à 13 h 5
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2020
    Messages: 15,997
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,111
    Modifié 4 janv. à 13 h 11
    Quoting: sensonfire
    1. Granlund is a bonafide #2 centre with term.

    2. Granlund is 50% on faceoffs playing for the Sharks while Namestnikov is 37% on faceoffs playing for the Jets.

    3. Granlund has 25 points in 31 games playing for the Sharks while Namestnikov has 20 points in 33 games playing for the jets.

    4. The Jets dump Schmidt and gain 950K in cap space for the next two seasons.

    5. The only thing of value the Jets give up is a late 1st.



    6. You trash every trade in AGM that involves the Jets, regardless of how good it is for the Jets.

    7. Your feedback is worthless.


    Lol. You made a bad proposal for a player the Jets don't need. Grow up.

    I like some ACGM's, just not bad ones like this.

    Namestnikov is better than Granlund 5 on 5 by quite a bit, so if Granlund is a 2C, so is Namestnikov. 5 extra points with 5 minutes a game extra for Granlund is pretty awful production.

    950k of unneeded cap space is one of the dumber reasons I've heard to give up a 1st.

    Your "reasoning" if we can call it that, is "give up a 1st for this player that is worse than what you currently have at 2C in every way except face offs "because it saves you cap space that you don't really need."
    4 janv. à 13 h 12
    #7
    Démarrer sujet
    sensonfire
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2021
    Messages: 11,920
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,469
    Quoting: Windjammer
    Lol. You made a bad proposal for a player the Jets don't need. Grow up.

    I like some ACGM's, just not bad ones like this.

    Namestnikov is better than Granlund 5 on 5 by quite a bit, so if Granlund is a 2C, so is Namestnikov. 5 extra points with 5 minutes a game extra for Granlund is pretty awful production.

    950k of unneeded cap space is one of the dumber reasons I've heard to give up a 1st.


    Show me 3 ACGMs involving trades to the Jets that you've openly endorsed in the comments.

    Or your feedback will remain worthless.
    4 janv. à 13 h 19
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2020
    Messages: 15,997
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,111
    Quoting: sensonfire
    Show me 3 ACGMs involving trades to the Jets that you've openly endorsed in the comments.

    Or your feedback will remain worthless.


    I expected you wouldn't be able to mount a rational defense of your bad proposal and I was correct.

    Do some research on teams you're making proposals on in the future so you don't look so ignorant on what those teams need or don't need.
    4 janv. à 13 h 21
    #9
    Démarrer sujet
    sensonfire
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2021
    Messages: 11,920
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,469
    Quoting: Windjammer
    I expected you wouldn't be able to mount a rational defense of your bad proposal and I was correct.

    Do some research on teams you're making proposals on in the future so you don't look so ignorant on what those teams need or don't need.


    I expected you wouldn't be able to show me 3 ACGMs involving trades to the Jets that you've openly endorsed in the comments.

    And I was correct.

    Your feedback is worthless.
    4 janv. à 13 h 49
    #10
    do not Devil my ass
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 4,908
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,268
    Quoting: holtzer
    i'm failing to see the point in that NJ trade

    Come on now, give it a think and you'll figure it out :'D
    sensonfire a aimé ceci.
    4 janv. à 19 h 3
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2021
    Messages: 643
    Mentions "j'aime": 417
    Yeah, decent proposal, but I agree with Windy here. I don't think the difference between Vladdy and Granlund is worth a 1st. And WPG doesn't need to shed Schmidt - I might prefer him in the playoffs over the other rookie guys. They can deal him in the offseason if they really need the cap space.
    sensonfire a aimé ceci.
    4 janv. à 23 h 16
    #12
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2023
    Messages: 543
    Mentions "j'aime": 428
    Sorry, but Granlund isn’t the C the Jets need… definitely not at that price.
    Dumping Schmidt is a huge plus, but not with a 1st and not for Granlund
    5 janv. à 7 h 59
    #13
    Démarrer sujet
    sensonfire
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2021
    Messages: 11,920
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,469
    Modifié 5 janv. à 8 h 6
    Quoting: CF18GM
    Yeah, decent proposal, but I agree with Windy here. I don't think the difference between Vladdy and Granlund is worth a 1st. And WPG doesn't need to shed Schmidt - I might prefer him in the playoffs over the other rookie guys. They can deal him in the offseason if they really need the cap space.


    Quoting: CanMerc
    Sorry, but Granlund isn’t the C the Jets need… definitely not at that price.
    Dumping Schmidt is a huge plus, but not with a 1st and not for Granlund


    Who are some centremen that would be worth trading for by the Jets ?
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage