SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Laine trade

Créé par: DFinn91
Équipe: 2023-24 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 13 déc. 2023
Publié: 13 déc. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Thoughts?
Transactions
CBJ
  1. Bordeleau, Thomas
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (NJD)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de VGK
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de NJD
2025
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de WPG
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de WSH
2026
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2483 500 000 $86 685 001 $25 000 $1 145 000 $-3 185 001 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C, AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
775 000 $775 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
912 500 $912 500 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
825 000 $825 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 350 000 $2 350 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
789 167 $789 167 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
13 déc. 2023 à 14 h 11
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 1,792
Mentions "j'aime": 716
If you make it a first I could see it happen as long as the sharks are not on Laine's list
13 déc. 2023 à 14 h 13
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 551
Mentions "j'aime": 203
Quoting: Logicalicesports
If you make it a first I could see it happen as long as the sharks are not on Laine's list


This is actually a conditional 1st from the devils. Sharks wouldn’t be wise to trade their own 1st for a player with the question marks Laine has. Maybe the sharks own 2nd, which may be very close to a late 1st.
13 déc. 2023 à 14 h 14
#3
Save Ukrane, end war
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 1,150
Mentions "j'aime": 783
Quoting: Logicalicesports
If you make it a first I could see it happen as long as the sharks are not on Laine's list


Value-wise maybe.. but Laine has done nothing in recent memory to justify what he makes and the cap hit on whatever team he's on. If I were the sharks I'd save the assets and spend the cap on players who are committed to putting in 100% effort all the time.
RecycleShark a aimé ceci.
13 déc. 2023 à 14 h 20
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,541
Mentions "j'aime": 4,178
San Jose should continue sucking for a few more years. I suggest they keep the pick and the prospect. They start becoming relevant again as Laine contract ends.

Value is fair (or not enough for Columbus) but San Jose is the wrong fit in my mind.
RecycleShark a aimé ceci.
13 déc. 2023 à 14 h 31
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,250
Mentions "j'aime": 4,677
Modifié 13 déc. 2023 à 14 h 39
Sharks have heart, solid coaching, and good leadership right now, it’s not a bad idea to buy Low on Laine. Financially and cap wise at 25 with 2 1/2 years left in his deal he’s either a huge piece of our future or a FA long before we need to use his cap hit on younger guys raises! And I have to say this, Bordeleau just doesn’t fit this teams future anymore! eapecially if sharks take a C or another LW in the next draft.

I did a similar ACGM with that pick and Bordz for Kuzmenko from Valcoucer but this isn’t a bad /bad option!
13 déc. 2023 à 14 h 36
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,250
Mentions "j'aime": 4,677
Quoting: TMLBRIAN
San Jose should continue sucking for a few more years. I suggest they keep the pick and the prospect. They start becoming relevant again as Laine contract ends.

Value is fair (or not enough for Columbus) but San Jose is the wrong fit in my mind.


The risk you run by designing a team to tank is building a loser culture and those are hard to break from just ask CBJ and Buffalo! Both those teams have immensely more talent than the sharks but are only a few points more than the sharks right now! I want Celebrini bad, but I want to reward this club for fighting and clawing back to a respectable record the last 18 games and adding Couture (Back in a month) with Laine would give the sharks a huge boost skill wise and hopefully our leadership could work with Laine!

Sharks still likely draft top 15 with the PIT pick and high teens with their own if they do this and you still get good players in this area of the draft!
TMLBRIAN et DFinn91 a aimé ceci.
13 déc. 2023 à 14 h 39
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 1,101
Mentions "j'aime": 546
SCREW IT PEDAL TO THE MEDAL THE TANK IS OFF COUTURE WILL LEAD US TO GLORY IN THE PLAYOFFS
13 déc. 2023 à 14 h 42
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,250
Mentions "j'aime": 4,677
Quoting: Letsgosharks
SCREW IT PEDAL TO THE MEDAL THE TANK IS OFF COUTURE WILL LEAD US TO GLORY IN THE PLAYOFFS


I want Hanifin, and Kuzmenko and a 1st round playoff berth where this team might surprise people!
13 déc. 2023 à 14 h 44
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 1,101
Mentions "j'aime": 546
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
I want Hanifin, and Kuzmenko and a 1st round playoff berth where this team might surprise people!


hahahahah, while a big part of me would love to see that, I would just love for us to take that step next year, with that being said, I don't want us to sell all of duclair or barabanov or even granny.
If we really want to be competitive next year we have the cap space for a good dman whether that comes in a trade or via FA
13 déc. 2023 à 14 h 46
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,250
Mentions "j'aime": 4,677
Quoting: Letsgosharks
hahahahah, while a big part of me would love to see that, I would just love for us to take that step next year, with that being said, I don't want us to sell all of duclair or barabanov or even granny.
If we really want to be competitive next year we have the cap space for a good dman whether that comes in a trade or via FA

Ok ok no Hanifin but yes to Kuzmenko and we sign Matt Roy (LAK) or pesche in the offseason!
Bring back Duke and Barbi and keep granny around. I’m on board with that!
Letsgosharks a aimé ceci.
13 déc. 2023 à 14 h 48
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 1,101
Mentions "j'aime": 546
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Ok ok no Hanifin but yes to Kuzmenko and we sign Matt Roy (LAK) or pesche in the offseason!
Bring back Duke and Barbi and keep granny around. I’m on board with that!


hahahaha, I would love Pesce! maybe Skjei would come around if we sign his d partner hahahaha doubt Carolina lets both go though
Rob32sjsharks a aimé ceci.
13 déc. 2023 à 15 h 36
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,250
Mentions "j'aime": 4,677
Quoting: Letsgosharks
hahahaha, I would love Pesce! maybe Skjei would come around if we sign his d partner hahahaha doubt Carolina lets both go though

I’m ok with just Roy honestly, he’s a solid 2 way defensive minded D. Zero PP time in his time with LAK but still puts up good numbers! Think as a 1RD he could be a 30-40 point player with plus D! Pair him with Thrun and keep Ferraro and Embersom together! That has been by far the sharks best pairing and 3rd pair is the best 2 of the rest!
Letsgosharks a aimé ceci.
13 déc. 2023 à 15 h 41
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 1,101
Mentions "j'aime": 546
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
I’m ok with just Roy honestly, he’s a solid 2 way defensive minded D. Zero PP time in his time with LAK but still puts up good numbers! Think as a 1RD he could be a 30-40 point player with plus D! Pair him with Thrun and keep Ferraro and Embersom together! That has been by far the sharks best pairing and 3rd pair is the best 2 of the rest!


Yeah, to say the least, the sharks have a VERY interesting off season coming up with like 35m in cap space
Rob32sjsharks a aimé ceci.
14 déc. 2023 à 3 h 11
#14
RecycleShark
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 956
Mentions "j'aime": 267
Quoting: Letsgosharks
SCREW IT PEDAL TO THE MEDAL THE TANK IS OFF COUTURE WILL LEAD US TO GLORY IN THE PLAYOFFS


Let's not get carried away, guys. I love the way the Sharks have been playing ately, but we're still a rebuilding team. We're still not going to make the playoffs. We don't need Laine at this time. We need our picks and prospects, and we need to get more. We're still sellers, not buyers. Agreed that Bordeleau isn't a great fit, but we need to trade him for a good pick or a better prospect, not an established player. We should still tank for Celebrini. We should still trade Ducair, Barbi, Hoffman, Labanc, Rutta, Granny, Kahkonen, Burroughs, Benning, Xadina, Kunin, and maybe even Couture, Hertl, and Ferraro. Gotta tear it down in order to build it up. The worst thing for the Sharks would be to spend years in the middle: too bad to make the playoffs but too good to get the top draft picks necessary for longterm success.
Letsgosharks a aimé ceci.
14 déc. 2023 à 9 h 50
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 1,101
Mentions "j'aime": 546
Quoting: RecycleShark
Let's not get carried away, guys. I love the way the Sharks have been playing ately, but we're still a rebuilding team. We're still not going to make the playoffs. We don't need Laine at this time. We need our picks and prospects, and we need to get more. We're still sellers, not buyers. Agreed that Bordeleau isn't a great fit, but we need to trade him for a good pick or a better prospect, not an established player. We should still tank for Celebrini. We should still trade Ducair, Barbi, Hoffman, Labanc, Rutta, Granny, Kahkonen, Burroughs, Benning, Xadina, Kunin, and maybe even Couture, Hertl, and Ferraro. Gotta tear it down in order to build it up. The worst thing for the Sharks would be to spend years in the middle: too bad to make the playoffs but too good to get the top draft picks necessary for longterm success.


I was being sarcastic but the rebuild may not be as far off as u think, we should keep couture hertl duclair the young guys need some leadership

We can’t roll with 20 entry level contracts

It’s also a business, we can’t be this bad for so many years to come, so let us be a little optimistic smile
RecycleShark a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage