All three trades could somewhat work.
What do you guys think?

Personally not a fan of the Tanev trade.
Reason 1 why not wait til UFA?
The assets are okish but not a long term answer.
Reason 2 that ship has sailed with next offseason being more important to keep building.

Pretty confident everyone declines

No incentive for Calgary to take that at all
Montreal just traded a 1st and 2nd for Newhook
Christainsen is performing well in the AHL so no reason to trade him away

The Montreal does NOT work.
The Habs traded away a 1st round pick + a very early 2nd round pick for Newhook (31 and 37).
He has had a very good start to the season and is gnied on a team friendly deal.

That offer to Montreal, especially after a single season of Newhook in Montreal, will be declined.

Respectfully. No insulting, nothing mean or anything.

So all three don’t work then.
Understood.

hence why i said unrealistic haha - just wanted to see what people gauge Newhook's value to be cuz it would definitely be interesting

Sorry, didn't realize I had 'quoted' your response instead of just 'liking' it lol

All good my friend!

You know, it's SOOOOO DIFFICULT to have a trade offer where BOTH sides agree. On this site, it's nearly impossible, and also, you can't please EVERYONE from both sides.
There are like 500 trade proposals per day here... and in real-life NHL, there's like 1 trade every like 3 weeks, for the entire NHL.
So it is complicated and hard. I'm sure the GMs talk non stop... but before pulling the trigger - unlike here - BOTH sides have to agree.

That's why I don't post any other trade proposals here; you just get trashed quickly, from at least one side.

I'd rather have Myers

Everyone declines these Vancouver offers.

i think youre delusional if you think the montreal trade can work, why on earth would montreal trade him at a cheaper price just a few month after getting him ????