Quoting: TMLBRIAN
New York already has 72m locked up next year in 13 players. They cap situation is VERY tight. Not sure they do this, but it is an option they would have to explore. They still have a nice right side without Trouba and they can get a cheaper piece to fill out that right side. And yes New York is super competitive. Tampa was very competitive when they gave McDonaugh away for free. Vegas was very competitive when they gave Fleury AND Pacioretty away for free. Sometimes it has to happen.
But I very much understand why New York keeps their captain and a big bruising RD.
Vegas throws players left and right, plus they always had cheaper, better, or younger options. Giving Trouba for free probably wouldn't help them replace him in any of those ways.
TB won the Cup twice, and they secured their core players who they wanted to keep around, as much as they liked him McDonaugh had to go to make way for Cirelli and Cernak's extensions. If you look at Rangers the "major" players that they need to sign next year are Lindgren, Kakko, and Schneider, and maybe Gustaffson. If they stick with him which I think they will, Kakko won't command a significant raise, Lindgren and Gustaffson would and I'm not too sure about Schneider. I would bet that Gustaffson wouldn't be brought back unless he's cheap and that Lindgren gets traded (just like Buchnevich was) if they can't afford him, he's an RFA so they should get a decent return. I would say that the Leafs probably had to less than 15.7M to allocate to ~10 guys, and they were able to make it work, so they might be just fine and able to bring back everyone (other than Gustaffson). The other UFAs are replaceable with cheap options.
(Edit: lol, took me so long to respond, already have so many replies. I've heard a lot of Rangers fans say that management likes Goodrow much to their dismay, so I doubt they buy him out. So, it's probably just a decision between Lindgren and Gustavsson).