SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Little moves

Créé par: SGB88
Équipe: 2023-24 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 7 nov. 2023
Publié: 7 nov. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
The better the Canucks play the cheaper they can sign Bear for. Bear wants a team with good RD opportunities and that's competing to maximize his chance to showcase his abilities, ideally in the playoffs and Canucks provide that opportunity. He's played here before and maybe he gets to play with Hughes.

I've seen Roslevic 50% retained for a 3rd suggested by CBJ fans, I don't know if the Garland trade works, but I guess let me know. The term on Garland isn't necessarily a downside for CBJ since they can have trouble signing players sometimes and they have the space.


For the Canucks this improves the RD and 3c (especially from an offensive perspective), plus it make sure the Canucks have lots of defense and center depth for the playoffs. With this, the Canucks have a left and right center on both bottom lines. They also have double RD as their scratches, but once the playoffs hit there is no roster or cap limit and they can call up there depth d which is all LD.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 900 000 $
Transactions
1.
MTL
  1. Woo, Jett
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (VAN)
Détails additionnels:
I think this a great great-depth piece, and with term for next year I think will be really helpful. I saw him offered for a 3rd in another trade thread by a Montreal fan. When I suggested I thought he was worth more threw in Woo.
2.
CBJ
  1. Garland, Conor
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (NJD)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2025
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2026
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $81 488 334 $850 000 $0 $2 011 666 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
775 000 $775 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C, AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
766 667 $766 667 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
775 000 $775 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
7 nov. 2023 à 14 h 47
#1
VAN
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 6,182
Mentions "j'aime": 1,883
Canucks should have claimed him. But, he probably would have stunk it up here pre-Tocchet. He'd be a solid add but I get why Montreal is happy to have him, especially at that $.
SGB88 a aimé ceci.
7 nov. 2023 à 14 h 51
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 1,751
Mentions "j'aime": 694
At the moment Kovacevic have a greater value for MTL then that 3rd pick. Mtl have a abondance of D prospect and also over 30 pick in the next 3 draft. Unless mtl get the player they are looking for or a offer then can absolutely not refuse they won’t simply gave him away. I would say that value wise that probably a good offer. Just not what Mtl are looking for right now.
SGB88 a aimé ceci.
7 nov. 2023 à 14 h 51
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 667
Mentions "j'aime": 201
Quoting: Prime_Jimbo
Canucks should have claimed him. But, he probably would have stunk it up here pre-Tocchet. He'd be a solid add but I get why Montreal is happy to have him, especially at that $.


Oh yeah for sure, I think you've got to pay for him. Montreal fans seem to think he's worth no more than 3rd, I think he's worth more. I'd consider a second since you're getting him for 2 years at that cap hit. He seems like a great fit for us. Too bad we didn't pick him up.

With these moves we've got lots of space for next year.
Prime_Jimbo et Joblow a aimé ceci.
7 nov. 2023 à 14 h 54
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 1,751
Mentions "j'aime": 694
Quoting: Prime_Jimbo
Canucks should have claimed him. But, he probably would have stunk it up here pre-Tocchet. He'd be a solid add but I get why Montreal is happy to have him, especially at that $.


He is nothing fancy, but he can stand is ground against NHLers. He is a good skater and defend well. On a shutdown bottom pairing he would be excellent. He doesn’t have much offense to is game but doesn’t all the ohter thing pretty well. Not sure why Winnipeg didn’t play him. Especially since they aren’t that deep on defense.
Prime_Jimbo et SGB88 a aimé ceci.
7 nov. 2023 à 14 h 56
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 667
Mentions "j'aime": 201
Quoting: Joblow
At the moment Kovacevic have a greater value for MTL then that 3rd pick. Mtl have a abondance of D prospect and also over 30 pick in the next 3 draft. Unless mtl get the player they are looking for or a offer then can absolutely not refuse they won’t simply gave him away. I would say that value wise that probably a good offer. Just not what Mtl are looking for right now.


Do you think at the deadline, if they're ready to have some of their RD prospects move up, they would do it? What about adding Juulsen or Irwin going back as well, at least someone to help shore up RD at an NHL level?
7 nov. 2023 à 14 h 57
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 667
Mentions "j'aime": 201
Quoting: Joblow
He is nothing fancy, but he can stand is ground against NHLers. He is a good skater and defend well. On a shutdown bottom pairing he would be excellent. He doesn’t have much offense to is game but doesn’t all the ohter thing pretty well. Not sure why Winnipeg didn’t play him. Especially since they aren’t that deep on defense.


Yeah, those are exactly the qualities the Canucks are looking for in an RD like that. They've got plenty of scoring on the D already obviously.
Joblow a aimé ceci.
7 nov. 2023 à 15 h 8
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 1,751
Mentions "j'aime": 694
Quoting: SGB88
Do you think at the deadline, if they're ready to have some of their RD prospects move up, they would do it? What about adding Juulsen or Irwin going back as well, at least someone to help shore up RD at an NHL level?


Unless Mailloux or Reinbacher show that they are definitely ready for a full time role i don’t see MTL trading him.
7 nov. 2023 à 15 h 12
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 1,751
Mentions "j'aime": 694
Quoting: SGB88
Yeah, those are exactly the qualities the Canucks are looking for in an RD like that. They've got plenty of scoring on the D already obviously.


Yeah absolutely!
7 nov. 2023 à 15 h 14
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 2,653
Mentions "j'aime": 1,698
Quoting: SGB88
Oh yeah for sure, I think you've got to pay for him. Montreal fans seem to think he's worth no more than 3rd, I think he's worth more. I'd consider a second since you're getting him for 2 years at that cap hit. He seems like a great fit for us. Too bad we didn't pick him up.

With these moves we've got lots of space for next year.


Most reasonable habs fans think hes wprth more than a 3rd.

Theres a lot of value in a big RD with a bit of term on the cheap. Canucks fans wpuld be acutely aware of that given they paid poolman 2.5 million to exist and be a RD lol.

If he gets moved i dont think it will be by himself I think it will be part of the inevitable monahan trade where by adding him its a multiple hole filling trade and the habs get something back that they couldnt if the two trades were seperate.
7 nov. 2023 à 15 h 18
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,182
Mentions "j'aime": 2,873
Can’t see the jackets trading for garland without retention. In this scenario I’d like to see the jackets half retain on roslovic and the Canucks retain 2 million
7 nov. 2023 à 16 h 22
#11
Canucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 838
Mentions "j'aime": 349
Cant believe Im saying this.. But no chance this team healthy scratches Myers right now, hes been a beast the last 6 games! I think if we can free up a bit of space with the Garland trade and sign Bear we are set on D.

Id be able to swallow the Roslovic trade purely for the freedom it gives the group next offseason even though I think its a downgrade.
SGB88 a aimé ceci.
7 nov. 2023 à 17 h 13
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 667
Mentions "j'aime": 201
Quoting: Tmclean64
Cant believe Im saying this.. But no chance this team healthy scratches Myers right now, hes been a beast the last 6 games! I think if we can free up a bit of space with the Garland trade and sign Bear we are set on D.

Id be able to swallow the Roslovic trade purely for the freedom it gives the group next offseason even though I think its a downgrade.


I don't care which of Myers, Bear or Kvocacevic is benched. If it's the playoffs chance that one of our top 4 RD will be injured.

With Roslovic you're getting cap space this year for Bear, you're upgrading center where we want more depth at the cost of the wing where we're fine, plus free cap space up for the next two years. Obviously, Garland is better if you don't consider those factors.

Even if you can also have Roslovic and Suter switch out center duties depending on if you're pressing for goal/on pp vs trying to hold a lead.
7 nov. 2023 à 17 h 18
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 667
Mentions "j'aime": 201
Quoting: SK101
Can’t see the jackets trading for garland without retention. In this scenario I’d like to see the jackets half retain on roslovic and the Canucks retain 2 million


That trade would be crazy for the Canucks to do. Garland would be a steal at 3m, his value would be crazy if he was a legit top 6 winger on a 3m contract, especially when the cap goes up next year. Roslovic is a nice pickup at the TDL 50% retained, but the suggested value I have for that is a 3rd. That just isn't an even or sensible trade. Plus it defeats the number one reason to do this trade, which is make space for next year. You're going to replace that value with something that costs more than 3m next year for sure. The 4th is to pay for the difference in value for Garland's slightly inefficient cap. I could see the argument for slightly more like a 7th or c prospect.
7 nov. 2023 à 19 h 1
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,182
Mentions "j'aime": 2,873
Quoting: SGB88
That trade would be crazy for the Canucks to do. Garland would be a steal at 3m, his value would be crazy if he was a legit top 6 winger on a 3m contract, especially when the cap goes up next year. Roslovic is a nice pickup at the TDL 50% retained, but the suggested value I have for that is a 3rd. That just isn't an even or sensible trade. Plus it defeats the number one reason to do this trade, which is make space for next year. You're going to replace that value with something that costs more than 3m next year for sure. The 4th is to pay for the difference in value for Garland's slightly inefficient cap. I could see the argument for slightly more like a 7th or c prospect.


Yes I agree but garland has negative value to the jackets without retention. Roslovic half retained should fetch a nice pick at the deadline. Jackets are trying to shed future cap so unfortunately this trade doesn’t make much sense for them
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage