SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

The only realistic deadline

Créé par: JesikaMorris
Équipe: 2023-24 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 26 oct. 2023
Publié: 27 oct. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Tanev, Christopher (1 200 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (CGY)
CGY
  1. Domi, Max
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
2.
TOR
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (VAN)
Détails additionnels:
This is assuming they’re still in good position to push for the playoffs
VAN
  1. Klingberg, John (2 075 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2024 (VAN)
Détails additionnels:
This move actually happens when timmins is ready to return which should be in 3 weeks a month max
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de NYI
Logo de CGY
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de VAN
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2026
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $80 031 450 $0 $0 $3 468 550 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Flames de Calgary
-75 000 $-75 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 550 000 $3 550 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
766 667 $766 667 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 oct. 2023 à 8 h 11
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 1,983
Mentions "j'aime": 788
Terribly not realistic actually. You don’t sign guys in the off-season just to trade them at the deadline when they were brought in to help win - if they were rebuilding, sure. But not when you’re competing.

Domi isn’t getting moved. He brings the playoff element of physicality and skill and he was brought in more for playoff depth scoring than regular season stats.

Klingberg isn’t going anywhere because he was brought in to be the quarterback on the top PP unit and he’s been excellent in the role. There’s no need to move him at all.
sedin33 a aimé ceci.
27 oct. 2023 à 8 h 35
#2
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 603
Mentions "j'aime": 155
Quoting: GreatWhiteNorth
Terribly not realistic actually. You don’t sign guys in the off-season just to trade them at the deadline when they were brought in to help win - if they were rebuilding, sure. But not when you’re competing.

Domi isn’t getting moved. He brings the playoff element of physicality and skill and he was brought in more for playoff depth scoring than regular season stats.

Klingberg isn’t going anywhere because he was brought in to be the quarterback on the top PP unit and he’s been excellent in the role. There’s no need to move him at all.


Yes both have been great but timmins can handle the 3RD spot and domi unfortunately has to go to make cap work when getting tanev tanev is a huge boost and the one thing the leafs really need
27 oct. 2023 à 8 h 37
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 3,928
Mentions "j'aime": 2,065
Quoting: JesikaMorris
Yes both have been great but timmins can handle the 3RD spot and domi unfortunately has to go to make cap work when getting tanev tanev is a huge boost and the one thing the leafs really need


Not realistic because Vancouver doesn’t need Klingberg. We have Hughes to QB the power play
Ryminister_92 a aimé ceci.
27 oct. 2023 à 8 h 39
#4
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 603
Mentions "j'aime": 155
Quoting: sedin33
Not realistic because Vancouver doesn’t need Klingberg. We have Hughes to QB the power play


Yeah I know that and there’s no way he knocks him off but he can certainly be a pp2 quarterback and excel at it he’s running Torontos pp1
27 oct. 2023 à 8 h 39
#5
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 603
Mentions "j'aime": 155
Quoting: sedin33
Not realistic because Vancouver doesn’t need Klingberg. We have Hughes to QB the power play


And Vancouver is looking for a defender
27 oct. 2023 à 8 h 49
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 605
Mentions "j'aime": 211
Considering Klingberg is average at defense at best we do not need him, we have Hughes and Hronek both guys can play on the PP what we need is a solid two way top 4 RHD. So wasting a 2nd on a redundant player on the canucks would not be optimal in any sense.
remowilliams, Warpbox et sedin33 a aimé ceci.
27 oct. 2023 à 8 h 58
#7
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 603
Mentions "j'aime": 155
Quoting: Canuckfan98
Considering Klingberg is average at defense at best we do not need him, we have Hughes and Hronek both guys can play on the PP what we need is a solid two way top 4 RHD. So wasting a 2nd on a redundant player on the canucks would not be optimal in any sense.


Okay fair enough
remowilliams et Boldirev a aimé ceci.
27 oct. 2023 à 10 h 30
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 667
Mentions "j'aime": 201
Maybe Klingberg is worth that, but the Canucks wouldn't want him.
JesikaMorris et Warpbox a aimé ceci.
27 oct. 2023 à 10 h 31
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 605
Mentions "j'aime": 200
Quoting: JesikaMorris
Okay fair enough


I think you are seeing the same negative elements in their (Domi/Klingberg) game that I am. When I watch those two I am thankful they are not on the Canucks. BIG misfires for T.O. IMO. I get it!!
27 oct. 2023 à 10 h 42
#10
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 603
Mentions "j'aime": 155
Quoting: Boldirev
I think you are seeing the same negative elements in their (Domi/Klingberg) game that I am. When I watch those two I am thankful they are not on the Canucks. BIG misfires for T.O. IMO. I get it!!


Both have played very well honestly it’s just we can’t afford to expose Timmins to waivers he’ll be very important next year and domi can still resign but you need to move him or jarnkrok to make the cap work and jarnkrok is just as good offensively and miles better defensively
27 oct. 2023 à 10 h 53
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 3,301
Mentions "j'aime": 1,512
Not making a lot of sense although I'd like to see either a Tanev or Zadorov brought in at some point.

It was reported in a few places that Anaheim couldn't give Klingberg away at last year's deadline...so either he has a great season and increases his value (and if he does that, leafs probably aren't trading him), or he doesn't and nobody wants to spend that cap space on him.

Only scenario I can see is if the leafs make a trade with a non-contender and they agree to take Klingberg in the package because the rest of what the leafs are sending in the deal is worthwhile.
27 oct. 2023 à 11 h 31
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 3,126
Mentions "j'aime": 2,235
Quoting: JesikaMorris
Yeah I know that and there’s no way he knocks him off but he can certainly be a pp2 quarterback and excel at it he’s running Torontos pp1


We have Hronek to run pp2
27 oct. 2023 à 12 h 2
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 667
Mentions "j'aime": 201
Quoting: Warpbox
We have Hronek to run pp2


Klingberg is probably an upgrade there, but why would we care about upgrading that. Canucks barely play their second pp and Tochett is on record saying he wants two D out for about the last 20s. Between 1:30 going to the first pp usually and basically giving up on the last 20s to some extent. That's like a .1 efficiency add to our pp as whole.

The other problem is that Myres already didn't pair with Hughes Klingberg also doesn't pair with Hughes, we need at least one alternative on the right side to Hronek to go with Hughes. If you add Myers to this and make it even money you're getting closer to making sense for the Canucks, but now it makes no sense for the leafs.

You could also swap him for Garland and we'll take care of our Myres problem on our own. Again I don't think this makes sense for Toronto.
Warpbox a aimé ceci.
27 oct. 2023 à 12 h 23
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 1,390
Mentions "j'aime": 1,456
Quoting: JesikaMorris
And Vancouver is looking for a defender


Were looking for a reliable defensive defender, which Klingberg is not
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage